Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Oct 19;60(10):e0105722. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01057-22. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
The detection of antibodies against Histoplasma capsulatum remains a frequently relied-on approach to diagnose histoplasmosis. We retrospectively assessed the performances of complement fixation (CF) and immunodiffusion (ID) assays for anti- antibody detection in patients with culture-confirmed histoplasmosis at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) over a 10-year period (2011 to 2020). Among 67 culture-confirmed patients who also had H. capsulatum CF/ID testing ordered, 51 (67.1%) were immunocompromised, 34 (50.7%) had localized disease, and 51 (76.1%) presented with <3 months of symptoms before testing. H. capsulatum CF and/or ID testing was positive in 47 (70.1%) patients, with both assays being positive in 39 cases. CF was positive in 44 (65.7%) patients, with reactivity against both H. capsulatum mycelial and yeast antigens in 30 (68.2%) cases, whereas 11 (25%) and 3 (6.8%) individuals had antibodies to the CF yeast or mycelial antigen only, respectively. H. capsulatum ID was positive in 42 (62.7%) patients, with the presence of the M-band only or the H- and M-bands in 27 (64.3%) and 15 (35.7%) cases, respectively. Among 18 serially tested patients, 12 remained ID and/or CF positive at the final time point (median, 154 days; range, 20 to 480 days). Serial CF testing showed that antibodies to the mycelial antigen serorevert to negative more frequently (6/11) than antibodies to the yeast antigen (2/13). There was no statistically significant difference in antibody positivity relative to patient immune status, degree of disease dissemination, or symptom duration. Serologic testing remains a valuable asset to support the diagnosis of histoplasmosis, particularly when direct detection methods fail to identify an infection.
检测荚膜组织胞浆菌抗体仍然是诊断荚膜组织胞浆菌病的常用方法。我们回顾性评估了在梅奥诊所(明尼苏达州罗切斯特)的 10 年期间(2011 年至 2020 年),针对经培养确诊的荚膜组织胞浆菌病患者进行补体固定(CF)和免疫扩散(ID)检测抗抗体检测的性能。在 67 例经培养确诊且同时进行荚膜组织胞浆菌 CF/ID 检测的患者中,51 例(67.1%)免疫功能低下,34 例(50.7%)为局限性疾病,51 例(76.1%)在检测前<3 个月出现症状。荚膜组织胞浆菌 CF 和/或 ID 检测呈阳性的患者有 47 例(70.1%),其中 39 例两种检测均为阳性。CF 阳性的患者有 44 例(65.7%),其中 30 例(68.2%)对荚膜组织胞浆菌菌丝和酵母抗原均有反应,而 11 例(25%)和 3 例(6.8%)患者仅对 CF 酵母或菌丝抗原有抗体。荚膜组织胞浆菌 ID 阳性的患者有 42 例(62.7%),仅存在 M 带或 H 和 M 带的患者分别为 27 例(64.3%)和 15 例(35.7%)。在 18 例连续检测的患者中,有 12 例在最后时间点(中位数,154 天;范围,20 至 480 天)仍为 ID 和/或 CF 阳性。连续 CF 检测显示,对菌丝抗原的抗体比对酵母抗原的抗体更常(6/11)转为阴性。抗体阳性与患者免疫状态、疾病播散程度或症状持续时间无统计学差异。血清学检测仍然是支持荚膜组织胞浆菌病诊断的一项有价值的方法,特别是当直接检测方法无法识别感染时。