Suppr超能文献

超声引导下关节内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)、高相对分子质量透明质酸及其联合治疗髋关节骨关节炎的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。

Comparison between the effects of ultrasound guided intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), high molecular weight hyaluronic acid, and their combination in hip osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 12;23(1):856. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05787-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intra articular (IA) injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are of the new methods in the management of hip osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of IA injections of PRP, HA and their combination in patients with hip OA. HA and PRP are two IA interventions that can be used in OA in the preoperative stages. Due to the different mechanisms of action, these two are proposed to have a synergistic effect by combining.

METHODS

This is a randomized clinical trial with three parallel groups. In this study, patients with grade 2 and 3 hip OA were included, and were randomly divided into three injection groups: PRP, HA and PRP + HA. In either group, two injections with 2 weeks' interval were performed into the hip joint under ultrasound guidance. Patients were assessed before the intervention, 2 months and 6 months after the second injection, using the visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Lequesne questionnaires.

RESULTS

One hundred five patients were enrolled randomly in HA, PRP and PRP + HA groups. All three groups showed significant improvement in WOMAC, VAS, and Lequesne at 2 months and 6 months compared with baseline. Comparison of the 3 groups demonstrated significant differences regarding WOMAC and Lequesne total scores and the activities of daily living (ADL) subscale of Lequesne (P = 0.041, 0.001 and 0.002, respectively), in which the observed improvement at 6th month was significantly higher in the PRP + HA and PRP groups compared to the HA group.

CONCLUSION

Although all 3 interventions were associated with improvement of pain and function in patients with hip OA, the therapeutic effects of PRP and PRP + HA injections lasted longer (6 months), and the effects of these two interventions on patients' performance, disability, and ADL were superior to HA in the long run. Moreover, the addition of HA to PRP was not associated with a significant increase in the therapeutic results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) website http://www.irct.ir/ , a WHO Primary Register setup, with the registration number of IRCT20130523013442N30 on 29/11/2019.

摘要

背景

关节内(IA)注射富含血小板的血浆(PRP)和透明质酸(HA)是髋关节骨关节炎(OA)治疗的新方法。本研究的目的是比较 IA 注射 PRP、HA 及其组合治疗髋 OA 患者的疗效。HA 和 PRP 是 OA 术前阶段可用于 IA 的两种干预措施。由于作用机制不同,这两种方法通过联合使用被提出具有协同作用。

方法

这是一项随机临床试验,分为三组平行组。本研究纳入了 2 级和 3 级髋 OA 患者,并随机分为 3 个注射组:PRP、HA 和 PRP+HA。在每组中,在超声引导下向髋关节内注射 2 次,间隔 2 周。在干预前、第二次注射后 2 个月和 6 个月,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和 Lequesne 问卷对患者进行评估。

结果

105 例患者被随机分配至 HA、PRP 和 PRP+HA 组。与基线相比,所有三组在 2 个月和 6 个月时 WOMAC、VAS 和 Lequesne 均有显著改善。三组之间的比较显示,WOMAC 和 Lequesne 总分以及 Lequesne 的日常生活活动(ADL)亚量表有显著差异(P=0.041、0.001 和 0.002),PRP+HA 和 PRP 组在 6 个月时的观察改善明显高于 HA 组。

结论

尽管所有 3 种干预措施均能改善髋 OA 患者的疼痛和功能,但 PRP 和 PRP+HA 注射的治疗效果持续时间更长(6 个月),从长远来看,这两种干预措施对患者的表现、残疾和 ADL 的影响优于 HA。此外,在 PRP 中加入 HA 并不能显著增加治疗效果。

试验注册

该研究在伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT)网站 http://www.irct.ir/ 上注册,该网站是世界卫生组织(WHO)建立的一个主要注册处,于 2019 年 11 月 29 日注册编号为 IRCT20130523013442N30。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e94/9465871/b6d98390c094/12891_2022_5787_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验