Courneya Kerry S, Booth Christopher M
Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 2;12:957135. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.957135. eCollection 2022.
Exercise has been proposed as a possible cancer treatment; however, there are an infinite number of clinical oncology settings involving diverse cancer types and treatment protocols in which exercise could be tested as a cancer treatment. The primary purpose of this paper is to propose a conceptual framework to organize and guide research on exercise as a cancer treatment across distinct clinical oncology settings. A secondary purpose is to provide an overview of existing exercise research using the proposed framework. The Exercise as Cancer Treatment (EXACT) framework proposes nine distinct clinical oncology scenarios based on tumor/disease status and treatment status at the time of the proposed exercise treatment. In terms of tumor/disease status, the primary tumor has either been surgically removed (primary goal to treat micrometastases), not surgically removed (primary goal to treat the primary tumor), or metastatic disease is present (primary goal to treat metastatic disease). In terms of treatment status, the extant disease has either not been treated yet (treatment naïve), is currently being treated (active treatment), or has previously been treated. These two key clinical oncology variables-tumor/disease status and treatment status-result in nine distinct clinical oncology scenarios in which exercise could be tested as a new cancer treatment: (a) treatment naïve micrometastases, (b) actively treated micrometastases, (c) previously treated micrometastases, (d) treatment naïve primary tumors, (e) actively treated primary tumors, (f) previously treated primary tumors, (g) treatment naïve metastatic disease, (h) actively treated metastatic disease, and (i) previously treated metastatic disease. To date, most preclinical animal studies have examined the effects of exercise on treatment naïve and actively treated primary tumors. Conversely, most observational human studies have examined the associations between exercise and cancer recurrence/survival in patients actively treated or previously treated for micrometastases. Few clinical trials have been conducted in any of these scenarios. For exercise to be integrated into clinical oncology practice as a cancer treatment, it will need to demonstrate benefit in a specific clinical setting. The EXACT framework provides a simple taxonomy for systematically evaluating exercise as a potential cancer treatment across a diverse range of cancer types and treatment protocols.
运动已被提议作为一种可能的癌症治疗方法;然而,涉及多种癌症类型和治疗方案的临床肿瘤学情况数不胜数,在这些情况中,运动都可以作为一种癌症治疗方法进行测试。本文的主要目的是提出一个概念框架,以组织和指导在不同临床肿瘤学情况下将运动作为癌症治疗方法的研究。第二个目的是使用所提出的框架概述现有的运动研究。“运动作为癌症治疗”(EXACT)框架根据提议的运动治疗时的肿瘤/疾病状态和治疗状态,提出了九种不同的临床肿瘤学情景。就肿瘤/疾病状态而言,原发性肿瘤要么已通过手术切除(治疗微转移的主要目标),要么未通过手术切除(治疗原发性肿瘤的主要目标),要么存在转移性疾病(治疗转移性疾病的主要目标)。就治疗状态而言,现存疾病要么尚未接受治疗(初治),要么正在接受治疗(积极治疗),要么以前接受过治疗。这两个关键的临床肿瘤学变量——肿瘤/疾病状态和治疗状态——导致了九种不同的临床肿瘤学情景,在这些情景中,运动可以作为一种新的癌症治疗方法进行测试:(a)初治微转移,(b)积极治疗的微转移,(c)既往治疗的微转移,(d)初治原发性肿瘤,(e)积极治疗的原发性肿瘤,(f)既往治疗的原发性肿瘤,(g)初治转移性疾病,(h)积极治疗的转移性疾病,以及(i)既往治疗的转移性疾病。迄今为止,大多数临床前动物研究都考察了运动对初治和积极治疗的原发性肿瘤的影响。相反,大多数观察性人体研究都考察了运动与接受过微转移积极治疗或既往治疗的患者癌症复发/生存之间的关联。在这些情景中,很少有临床试验开展。要将运动作为一种癌症治疗方法纳入临床肿瘤学实践,它需要在特定的临床环境中证明其益处。EXACT框架提供了一个简单的分类法,用于系统地评估运动作为一种潜在的癌症治疗方法,适用于各种癌症类型和治疗方案。