• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MRI评估乳腺癌亚型新辅助化疗后的反应:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

MRI to assess response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Janssen L M, den Dekker B M, Gilhuijs K G A, van Diest P J, van der Wall E, Elias S G

机构信息

Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Sep 19;8(1):107. doi: 10.1038/s41523-022-00475-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41523-022-00475-1
PMID:36123365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9485124/
Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to estimate and compare sensitivity, specificity, positive- (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting pathological complete remission (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. We stratified for molecular subtype by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and explored the impact of other factors. Two researchers systematically searched PUBMED and EMBASE to select relevant studies and extract data. For meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity, we used bivariate random-effects models. Twenty-six included studies contained 4497 patients. There was a significant impact of IHC subtype on post-NAC MRI accuracy (p = 0.0082) for pCR. The pooled sensitivity was 0.67 [95% CI 0.58-0.74] for the HR-/HER2-, 0.65 [95% CI 0.56-0.73] for the HR-/HER2+, 0.55 [95% CI 0.45-0.64] for the HR+/HER2- and 0.60 [95% CI 0.50-0.70] for the HR+/HER2+ subtype. The pooled specificity was 0.85 [95% CI 0.81-0.88] for the HR-/HER2-, 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.86] for the HR-/HER2+, 0.88[95% CI 0.84-0.91] for the HR+/HER2- and 0.74 [95% CI 0.63-0.83] for the HR+/HER2+ subtype. The PPV was highest in the HR-/HER2- subtype and lowest in the HR+/HER2- subtype. MRI field strength of 3.0 T was associated with a higher sensitivity compared to 1.5 T (p = 0.00063). The accuracy of MRI for predicting pCR depends on molecular subtype, which should be taken into account in clinical practice. Higher MRI field strength positively impacts accuracy. When intervention trials based on MRI response evaluation are designed, the impact of IHC subtype and field strength on MR accuracy should be considered.

摘要

本荟萃分析旨在评估和比较磁共振成像(MRI)在预测早期乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗(NAC)后病理完全缓解(pCR)方面的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。我们通过免疫组织化学(IHC)对分子亚型进行分层,并探讨其他因素的影响。两名研究人员系统检索了PUBMED和EMBASE以选择相关研究并提取数据。对于敏感性和特异性的荟萃分析,我们使用了双变量随机效应模型。纳入的26项研究共包含4497例患者。IHC亚型对NAC后MRI预测pCR的准确性有显著影响(p = 0.0082)。HR-/HER2-亚型的合并敏感性为0.67 [95%可信区间0.58 - 0.74],HR-/HER2+亚型为0.65 [95%可信区间0.56 - 0.73],HR+/HER2-亚型为0.55 [95%可信区间0.45 - 0.64],HR+/HER2+亚型为0.60 [95%可信区间0.50 - 0.70]。HR-/HER2-亚型的合并特异性为0.85 [95%可信区间0.81 - 0.88],HR-/HER2+亚型为0.81 [95%可信区间0.74 - 0.86],HR+/HER2-亚型为0.88[95%可信区间0.84 - 0.91],HR+/HER2+亚型为0.74 [95%可信区间0.63 - 0.83]。PPV在HR-/HER2-亚型中最高,在HR+/HER2-亚型中最低。与1.5 T相比,3.0 T的MRI场强与更高的敏感性相关(p = 0.00063)。MRI预测pCR的准确性取决于分子亚型,临床实践中应予以考虑。更高的MRI场强对准确性有积极影响。在设计基于MRI反应评估的干预试验时,应考虑IHC亚型和场强对MR准确性的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b9c/9485124/c64320b16777/41523_2022_475_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b9c/9485124/814afe07aaa0/41523_2022_475_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b9c/9485124/c64320b16777/41523_2022_475_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b9c/9485124/814afe07aaa0/41523_2022_475_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b9c/9485124/c64320b16777/41523_2022_475_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
MRI to assess response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.MRI评估乳腺癌亚型新辅助化疗后的反应:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Sep 19;8(1):107. doi: 10.1038/s41523-022-00475-1.
2
MRI Performance in Detecting pCR After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Molecular Subtype of Breast Cancer.MRI 性能在检测新辅助化疗后乳腺癌分子亚型的 pCR 中的作用。
World J Surg. 2019 Sep;43(9):2254-2261. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05032-9.
3
Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.乳腺癌亚型与新辅助化疗病理完全缓解相关性的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Dec;48(18):3342-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
4
Prediction of pathologic complete response on MRI in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to molecular subtypes.根据分子亚型预测接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者 MRI 下的病理完全缓解。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun;32(6):4056-4066. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08461-0. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
5
Discrepancies Between Pathological Tumor Responses and Estimations of Complete Response by Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Differ by Breast Cancer Subtype.新辅助化疗后磁共振成像评估的完全缓解与病理肿瘤反应之间的差异因乳腺癌亚型而异。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Apr;18(2):128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
6
Accuracy of breast magnetic resonance imaging in predicting pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.乳腺磁共振成像预测新辅助化疗患者病理反应的准确性。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2011 Oct;11(5):312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
7
Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment for operable breast cancer. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 017.磁共振成像预测可手术乳腺癌新辅助全身治疗患者的病理反应。转化乳腺癌研究联盟试验 017。
Cancer. 2013 May 15;119(10):1776-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27995. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
8
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathological complete response of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: association with breast cancer subtype.磁共振成像预测新辅助化疗后乳腺癌病理完全缓解的准确性:与乳腺癌亚型的关联
Springerplus. 2016 Feb 24;5:152. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1800-x. eCollection 2016.
9
Evaluating the role of magnetic resonance imaging post-neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the NEONAB trial.在NEONAB试验中评估磁共振成像在乳腺癌新辅助治疗后的作用。
Intern Med J. 2018 Jun;48(6):699-705. doi: 10.1111/imj.13617.
10
Survival is associated with complete response on MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.在雌激素受体(ER)阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性乳腺癌中,生存与新辅助化疗后MRI上的完全缓解相关。
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 5;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0742-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Head‑to‑head comparison of contrast‑enhanced mammography and MRI in assessing the tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a prospective, multireader study.对比增强乳腺钼靶摄影与MRI在评估乳腺癌新辅助治疗肿瘤反应中的头对头比较:一项前瞻性、多读者研究
Radiol Med. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-02068-x.
2
Deep learning-based radiomics does not improve residual cancer burden prediction post-chemotherapy in LIMA breast MRI trial.在LIMA乳腺癌MRI试验中,基于深度学习的影像组学并不能改善化疗后残余癌负荷的预测。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11801-z.
3
Correlation Between Pathological and MRI Radiological Tumor Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Luminal Breast Cancer: A Single Institution Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: a multicentre pooled analysis of 5161 patients.新辅助化疗后残余肿瘤负担与乳腺癌长期生存结局:5161 例患者的多中心汇总分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):149-160. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00589-1. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
2
Clinico-pathologic predictors of patterns of residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.新辅助化疗治疗乳腺癌后残留疾病模式的临床病理预测因素。
Mod Pathol. 2021 May;34(5):875-882. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-00714-5. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist.
非腔面型乳腺癌新辅助化疗后病理与MRI影像学肿瘤反应的相关性:单机构经验
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2025 Jul;8(7):e70275. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.70275.
4
Application of N-NOSE for Evaluating the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients.N-NOSE在评估乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗反应中的应用。
Cells. 2025 Jun 21;14(13):950. doi: 10.3390/cells14130950.
5
Breast MRI for Assessing Triple-Negative Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy.新辅助化疗免疫治疗后采用乳腺磁共振成像评估三阴性乳腺癌
Radiology. 2025 Jul;316(1):e251503. doi: 10.1148/radiol.251503.
6
Comparison of diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced MRI for monitoring response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer.扩散加权磁共振成像与对比增强磁共振成像在监测乳腺癌新辅助治疗反应中的比较
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11640-y.
7
MRI-based artificial intelligence models for post-neoadjuvant surgery personalization in breast cancer: a narrative review of evidence from Western Pacific.基于MRI的人工智能模型在乳腺癌新辅助治疗后手术个性化中的应用:西太平洋地区证据的叙述性综述
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Dec 6;57:101254. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101254. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
MRI-Based Model for Personalizing Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer.基于磁共振成像的乳腺癌新辅助治疗个性化模型
Tomography. 2025 Feb 27;11(3):26. doi: 10.3390/tomography11030026.
9
Digital mammography with AI-based computer-aided diagnosis to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer patients: comparison with MRI.基于人工智能计算机辅助诊断的数字乳腺摄影术预测HER2阳性和三阴性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗反应:与MRI的比较
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11390-x.
10
Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters effectively predict treatment efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.定量动态对比增强磁共振成像参数可有效预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗的治疗效果。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Feb 15;17(2):1039-1048. doi: 10.62347/GTIX2261. eCollection 2025.
诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-DTA):解释、详述及清单
BMJ. 2020 Aug 14;370:m2632. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2632.
4
The diagnostic performance of CESM and CE-MRI in evaluating the pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.对比增强乳腺X线摄影(CESM)和对比增强磁共振成像(CE-MRI)在评估乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理反应中的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Br J Radiol. 2020 Aug;93(1112):20200301. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200301. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
5
Radiogenomic Analysis of Breast Cancer by Linking MRI Phenotypes with Tumor Gene Expression.基于 MRI 表型与肿瘤基因表达关联的乳腺癌放射组学分析。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):277-287. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191453. Epub 2020 May 26.
6
The Diagnostic Performance of DCE-MRI in Evaluating the Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.动态对比增强磁共振成像评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理反应的诊断效能:一项Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 12;10:93. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00093. eCollection 2020.
7
Eliminating the breast cancer surgery paradigm after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: current evidence and future challenges.新辅助全身治疗后消除乳腺癌手术模式:当前证据和未来挑战。
Ann Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.012.
8
Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.用于评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗的定量动态对比增强磁共振成像的Meta分析
Am Surg. 2019 Jun 1;85(6):645-653.
9
MRI Performance in Detecting pCR After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Molecular Subtype of Breast Cancer.MRI 性能在检测新辅助化疗后乳腺癌分子亚型的 pCR 中的作用。
World J Surg. 2019 Sep;43(9):2254-2261. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05032-9.
10
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Use in Breast Cancer is Greatest in Excellent Responders: Triple-Negative and HER2+ Subtypes.新辅助化疗在乳腺癌中的应用在优秀应答者中最大:三阴性和 HER2+亚型。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(8):2241-2248. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6531-5. Epub 2018 May 21.