Matsuda Takeru, Sawada Ryuichiro, Hasegawa Hiroshi, Yamashita Kimihiro, Utsumi Masako, Harada Hitoshi, Urakawa Naoki, Goto Hironobu, Kanaji Shingo, Oshikiri Taro, Kakeji Yoshihiro
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-chou, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1562-1568. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09617-9. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
Although lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) might be an effective approach for patients with rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis, it is technically challenging because of the anatomical complexity and location of the deep pelvis. An assistance by transanal approach might be useful for a successful LLND.
From September 2016 to May 2021, 39 patients with low rectal cancer underwent transanal total mesorectal excision with LLND. Among them, 18 patients underwent LLND using a conventional laparoscopic approach alone, while the remaining 21 underwent LLND using both conventional and transanal approaches. Their clinical outcomes were retrospectively compared.
The operation time for LLND on each side was significantly shorter in the transanal group (105 min vs. 54 min, P < 0.001). The intraoperative blood loss was also significantly less in the transanal group (40 g vs. 0 g, P = 0.031). The rate of overall postoperative complications ≥ grade II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification was significantly less in the transanal group (66.7% vs. 28.6%, odds ratio: 5.000, 95% confidence intervals: 1.313-19.047, P = 0.040). The number of harvested lateral lymph nodes in both groups was similar (8.5 vs. 8, P = 0.544).
The transanal approach for LLND reduced operative time, blood loss, and morbidity compared with the conventional approach alone in a cohort of patients with rectal cancer.
尽管侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LLND)可能是治疗伴有侧方淋巴结转移的直肠癌患者的有效方法,但由于骨盆深部的解剖复杂性和位置,该手术在技术上具有挑战性。经肛门入路辅助可能有助于成功进行LLND。
2016年9月至2021年5月,39例低位直肠癌患者接受了经肛门全直肠系膜切除术并进行LLND。其中,18例患者仅采用传统腹腔镜入路进行LLND,其余21例采用传统和经肛门联合入路进行LLND。对他们的临床结果进行回顾性比较。
经肛门组每侧LLND的手术时间明显更短(105分钟对54分钟,P<0.001)。经肛门组术中出血量也明显更少(40克对0克,P = 0.031)。根据Clavien-Dindo分类,经肛门组术后≥Ⅱ级总体并发症发生率明显更低(66.7%对28.6%,优势比:5.000,95%置信区间:1.313 - 19.047,P = 0.040)。两组采集的侧方淋巴结数量相似(8.5对8,P = 0.544)。
在一组直肠癌患者中,与单纯传统入路相比,经肛门入路进行LLND可减少手术时间、出血量和发病率。