Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2022 May-Jun;155(5&6):526-537. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2292_21.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: The high mortality associated with the thrombotic events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients resulted in the usage of anticoagulants in varying doses. Whether high-dose anticoagulants have led to better outcomes or higher incidence of clinically significant bleeding events is debatable. Thus, this study was conducted to find the incidence of clinically significant bleeding events in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) patients on therapeutic anticoagulation and their outcomes.
In this retrospective, single-centre study of 155 critically ill COVID-19 patients, the incidence of clinically significant bleeding was observed. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association between anticoagulant regimen, coagulation and inflammatory markers with the incidence of bleeding and thrombotic events.
The incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 33.54 per cent (26.17-41.46%) and major bleeding was 9.03 per cent (5.02-14.69%). The anticoagulation intensity at baseline had a high odds of major bleeding when enoxaparin and dual antiplatelet therapy were used together [adjusted odds ratio OR of 434.09 (3.81-49502.95), P<0.05]. At admission, bleeders had a poorer PaO/FiO ratio with more patients on invasive ventilation. At the time of bleeding, the bleeders had a higher D-dimer, ferritin, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin compared to non-bleeders. The subhazard ratio for death in bleeders was 3.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.97-5.65; P<0.001).
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of bleeding in critically ill COVID-19 patients on therapeutic anticoagulation may increase with the severity of the disease as well as with concurrent use of dual antiplatelets. Major bleeding may also contribute to higher mortality.
COVID-19 住院患者血栓事件相关的高死亡率导致了不同剂量抗凝剂的使用。高剂量抗凝剂是否能带来更好的结果或更高的临床显著出血事件发生率仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在探讨中重度 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者接受治疗性抗凝治疗时临床显著出血事件的发生率及其结局。
在这项回顾性的、单中心的 155 例危重症 COVID-19 患者研究中,观察了临床显著出血的发生率。使用多变量回归模型评估抗凝方案、凝血和炎症标志物与出血和血栓事件发生率之间的关系。
临床相关非大出血的发生率为 33.54%(26.17%-41.46%),大出血的发生率为 9.03%(5.02%-14.69%)。当同时使用依诺肝素和双联抗血小板治疗时,基线抗凝强度与大出血的发生具有较高的优势比[调整后的优势比(OR)为 434.09(3.81-49502.95),P<0.05]。入院时,出血患者的 PaO/FiO 比值较差,更多患者接受有创通气。出血时,出血患者的 D-二聚体、铁蛋白、C 反应蛋白和降钙素原均高于非出血患者。出血患者的死亡亚危险比为 3.35(95%置信区间,1.97-5.65;P<0.001)。
接受治疗性抗凝治疗的危重症 COVID-19 患者出血的发生率可能会随着疾病的严重程度以及双联抗血小板药物的同时使用而增加。大出血也可能导致更高的死亡率。