Children's Clinical University Hospital, Vienibas Gatve 45, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.
Riga Stradins University, Dzirciema 16, Riga, LV-1007, Latvia.
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Sep 21;22(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03608-4.
Although self-limiting viral infections are predominant, children with acute infections are often prescribed antibiotics by family physicians. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of two interventions, namely C-reactive protein point-of-care testing and educational training, on antibiotic prescribing by family physicians.
This randomised controlled intervention study included acutely ill children consulted by 80 family physicians from urban and rural practices in Latvia. The family physicians were divided into two groups of 40. The family physicians in the intervention group received both interventions, i.e. C-reactive protein point-of-care testing and educational training, whereas the family physicians in the control group continued to dispense their standard care. The primary outcome measure was the antibiotic prescribing at the index consultation (delayed or immediate prescription) in both study groups. The secondary outcome was CRP testing per study group. Patient- and family physician- related predictors of antibiotic prescribing were analysed as associated independent variables. Practice location effect on the outcomes was specially addressed, similar to other scientific literature.
In total, 2039 children with acute infections were enrolled in the study. The most common infections observed were upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Overall, 29.8% (n = 607) of the study population received antibiotic prescription. Our binary logistic regression analysis did not find a statistically significant association between antibiotic prescriptions and the implemented interventions. In the control group of family physicians, a rural location was associated with more frequent antibiotic prescribing and minimal use of CRP testing of venous blood samples. However, in the intervention group of family physicians, a rural location was associated with a higher level of C-reactive protein point-of-care testing. Furthermore, in rural areas, a significant reduction in antibiotic prescribing was observed in the intervention group compared with the control group (29.0% (n = 118) and 37.8% (n = 128), respectively, p = 0.01).
Our results show that the availabilty of C-reactive protein point-of-care testing and educational training for family physicians did not reduce antibiotic prescribing. Nevertheless, our data indicate that regional variations in antibiotic-prescribing habits exist and the implemented interventions had an effect on family physicians practices in rural areas.
尽管自限性病毒感染较为常见,但儿童急性感染常由家庭医生开具抗生素。本研究旨在评估两种干预措施(即 C 反应蛋白即时检测和教育培训)对家庭医生开具抗生素处方的影响。
这是一项随机对照干预研究,纳入了 80 名来自拉脱维亚城乡实践的家庭医生诊治的急性疾病儿童。家庭医生分为两组,每组 40 名。干预组家庭医生接受了 C 反应蛋白即时检测和教育培训两项干预措施,而对照组家庭医生则继续采用其标准护理。主要结局指标是两组研究对象在首次就诊时的抗生素处方(延迟或立即处方)。次要结局指标是每组的 CRP 检测。分析了患者和家庭医生相关的抗生素处方预测因素,作为相关的独立变量。特别考虑了实践地点对结果的影响,类似于其他科学文献。
本研究共纳入 2039 例急性感染患儿。观察到最常见的感染是上呼吸道和下呼吸道感染。总体而言,607 例(29.8%)研究人群接受了抗生素处方。我们的二元逻辑回归分析未发现抗生素处方与实施的干预措施之间存在统计学显著关联。在对照组家庭医生中,农村地区与更频繁开具抗生素处方和较少使用静脉血 CRP 检测相关。然而,在干预组家庭医生中,农村地区与更高水平的 C 反应蛋白即时检测相关。此外,与对照组相比,干预组在农村地区抗生素处方的开具显著减少(分别为 29.0%(n=118)和 37.8%(n=128),p=0.01)。
我们的研究结果表明,为家庭医生提供 C 反应蛋白即时检测和教育培训并不能减少抗生素处方。然而,我们的数据表明,抗生素处方习惯存在地区差异,并且实施的干预措施对农村地区的家庭医生实践产生了影响。