• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[患者群体特定的数据主权需求与电子健康记录的接受度]

[Patient group-specific data sovereignty needs and acceptance of electronic health records].

作者信息

Baron von Osthoff Marc, Watzlaw-Schmidt Ute, Lehmann Thomas, Hübner Jutta

机构信息

Fakultät Medien, Hochschule Mittweida, Technikumplatz 17, 09648, Mittweida, Deutschland.

Palliativstützpunkt Hameln-Pyrmont, Hameln, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Nov;65(11):1197-1203. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03589-w. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-022-03589-w
PMID:36149472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9636088/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

People in Germany are very sensitive about their health data. The electronic health record (ePA) also raises questions about the patient's need for data sovereignty and acceptance. The possibility of selectively withholding data stored in the ePA from physicians who continue to treat the patient (opt-out) and the patient's prior knowledge of the ePA could influence the need for data sovereignty and acceptance of the ePA. The aim of this explorative study is to investigate these influences for three patient groups: "acute patients," "diabetes type 2 patients," and "palliative patients," as differences are expected between these groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From August to October 2019, a quantitative survey was conducted among 140 patients in the abovementioned groups.

RESULTS

Of the respondents, 76.0% supported the selective opt-out option and stated that this would increase their willingness to participate in the ePA. Specifically, 81.1% of acute care patients, 80.6% of palliative care patients, and 65.6% of type 2 diabetes patients made this statement. Differences between groups were not significant. A general prior knowledge of the ePA was related to a higher need for data sovereignty - 43.2% of those who had never heard of the ePA rollout would occasionally hide their health data from other physicians, compared with 54.5% who knew of the rollout.

DISCUSSION

Consideration of the data sovereignty needs of patients in the further establishment of the ePA is recommended. The selective opt-out option can contribute to acceptance. Knowledge of the ePA should be expanded, especially in the doctor-patient discussion, to enable an informed decision.

摘要

背景与目的

德国人对其健康数据非常敏感。电子健康记录(ePA)也引发了关于患者对数据主权和接受度需求的问题。从继续治疗患者的医生那里选择性隐瞒存储在ePA中的数据的可能性(选择退出)以及患者对ePA的事先了解可能会影响对数据主权的需求和对ePA的接受度。这项探索性研究的目的是调查这三种患者群体(“急性病患者”、“2型糖尿病患者”和“姑息治疗患者”)的这些影响,因为预计这些群体之间会存在差异。

材料与方法

2019年8月至10月,对上述群体的140名患者进行了定量调查。

结果

在受访者中,76.0%支持选择性退出选项,并表示这会增加他们参与ePA的意愿。具体而言,81.1%的急性护理患者、80.6%的姑息治疗患者和65.6%的2型糖尿病患者发表了这一言论。组间差异不显著。对ePA的一般事先了解与对数据主权的更高需求相关——从未听说过ePA推出的人中有43.2%会偶尔向其他医生隐瞒自己的健康数据,相比之下,知道推出情况的人中有54.5%会这样做。

讨论

建议在进一步建立ePA时考虑患者的数据主权需求。选择性退出选项有助于提高接受度。应扩大对ePA的了解,尤其是在医患讨论中,以便做出明智的决定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9338/9636088/71551f10d8cf/103_2022_3589_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9338/9636088/71551f10d8cf/103_2022_3589_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9338/9636088/71551f10d8cf/103_2022_3589_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Patient group-specific data sovereignty needs and acceptance of electronic health records].[患者群体特定的数据主权需求与电子健康记录的接受度]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Nov;65(11):1197-1203. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03589-w. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
2
Citizen Views on an Opt-Out Approach to National Electronic Health Records in Germany: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study.公民对德国国家电子健康记录采用选择退出方法的看法:一项小规模定性研究。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;69:1607288. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607288. eCollection 2024.
3
[Electronic health records in Germany].[德国的电子健康记录]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Jul;48(7):742-6. doi: 10.1007/s00103-005-1084-8.
4
"Why Do They Need to Check Me?" Patient Participation Through eHealth and the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Qualitative Study.“他们为什么要给我做检查?” 通过电子健康和医患关系实现患者参与:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 15;20(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8444.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
[Per aspera ad astra: implementation of electronic patient records in a university eye hospital : Experience with FIDUS in the Clinic for Ophthalmology at the Saarland University Medical Center UKS].[历经艰难,方达星辰:大学眼科医院电子病历的实施:萨尔兰大学医学中心眼科诊所使用FIDUS的经验]
Ophthalmologe. 2018 Oct;115(10):868-877. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0588-6.
7
[Knowledge and attitudes towards sharing of health data: Results of a population survey].[关于健康数据共享的知识与态度:一项人口调查的结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Mar;184:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
8
Can disability accommodation needs stored in electronic health records help providers prepare for patient visits? A qualitative study.残疾人住宿需求能否存储在电子健康记录中,帮助提供者为患者就诊做准备?一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 16;20(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05808-z.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
Acceptability of a decision-support electronic health record system and its impact on diabetes care goals in South Asia: a mixed-methods evaluation of the CARRS trial.接受度一项决策支持型电子健康记录系统及其对南亚糖尿病护理目标的影响:CARRS 试验的混合方法评估。
Diabet Med. 2018 Dec;35(12):1644-1654. doi: 10.1111/dme.13804. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing uploads of health data in the electronic health record-The role of framing and length of privacy information: A survey study in Germany.增强电子健康记录中健康数据的上传——隐私信息的框架和长度的作用:德国的一项调查研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 31;11:20552076251351197. doi: 10.1177/20552076251351197. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Trustworthiness of the electronic health record in Germany: an exploratory, user-centered analysis.德国电子健康记录的可信度:一项探索性的、以用户为中心的分析。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 7;7:1473326. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1473326. eCollection 2025.
3
Disease characteristics influence the privacy calculus to adopt electronic health records: A survey study in Germany.

本文引用的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Pneumo News. 2021;13(1):22-27. doi: 10.1007/s15033-021-2676-1. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
[Digitalization/e-health].
Somnologie (Berl). 2020;24(3):135-137. doi: 10.1007/s11818-020-00266-5. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
Use of a Patient Portal for Engaging Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Patterns and Prediction.使用患者门户来吸引 2 型糖尿病患者:模式和预测。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Oct;21(10):546-556. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0074.
疾病特征影响采用电子健康记录的隐私权衡:德国的一项调查研究
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241274245. doi: 10.1177/20552076241274245. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Influence of Disease-Related Stigma on Patients' Decisions to Upload Medical Reports to the German Electronic Health Record: Randomized Controlled Trial.疾病污名对患者将医疗报告上传至德国电子健康记录决策的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 10;11:e52625. doi: 10.2196/52625.