• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年脓毒性休克患者的最佳目标血压(OPTPRESS)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

Optimal target blood pressure in elderly with septic shock (OPTPRESS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Trauma and Acute Critical Care Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Acute Critical Care Medicine, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, 4-1-1 Otsuno, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Trials. 2022 Sep 24;23(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06732-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-06732-9
PMID:36153530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9509562/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemodynamic stabilization is a core component in the resuscitation of septic shock. However, the optimal target blood pressure remains debatable. Previous randomized controlled trials suggested that uniformly adopting a target mean arterial pressure (MAP) higher than 65 mmHg for all adult septic shock patients would not be beneficial; however, it has also been proposed that higher target MAP may be beneficial for elderly patients, especially those with arteriosclerosis.

METHODS

A multicenter, pragmatic single-blind randomized controlled trial will be conducted to compare target MAP of 80-85 mmHg (high-target) and 65-70 mmHg (control) in the resuscitation of septic shock patients admitted to 28 hospitals in Japan. Patients with septic shock aged ≥65 years are randomly assigned to the high-target or control groups. The target MAP shall be maintained for 72 h after randomization or until vasopressors are no longer needed to improve patients' condition. To minimize the adverse effects related to catecholamines, if norepinephrine dose of ≥ 0.1 μg/kg/min is needed to maintain the target MAP, vasopressin will be initiated. Other therapeutic approaches, including fluid administration, hydrocortisone use, and antibiotic choice, will be determined by the physician in charge based on the latest clinical guidelines. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 90 days after randomization.

DISCUSSION

The result of this trial will provide great insight on the resuscitation strategy for septic shock in the era of global aged society. Also, it will provide the better understanding on the importance of individualized treatment strategy in hemodynamic management in critically ill patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000041775. Registered 13 September 2020.

摘要

背景

血流动力学稳定是脓毒性休克复苏的核心组成部分。然而,最佳的目标血压仍然存在争议。先前的随机对照试验表明,对所有成年脓毒性休克患者统一采用高于 65mmHg 的目标平均动脉压(MAP)可能没有益处;然而,也有人提出较高的目标 MAP 可能对老年患者有益,尤其是那些有动脉硬化的患者。

方法

一项多中心、实用、单盲随机对照试验将比较在日本 28 家医院收治的脓毒性休克患者复苏中,目标 MAP 为 80-85mmHg(高目标组)和 65-70mmHg(对照组)的效果。年龄≥65 岁的脓毒性休克患者随机分为高目标组或对照组。随机分组后 72 小时内将维持目标 MAP,或直至血管加压剂不再需要改善患者病情。为尽量减少与儿茶酚胺相关的不良反应,如果需要≥0.1μg/kg/min 的去甲肾上腺素剂量来维持目标 MAP,将开始使用血管加压素。其他治疗方法,包括液体管理、氢化可的松使用和抗生素选择,将由主管医生根据最新的临床指南决定。主要结局为随机分组后 90 天的全因死亡率。

讨论

该试验的结果将为老龄化社会全球时代脓毒性休克的复苏策略提供重要的见解。此外,它还将更好地了解在危重病患者的血流动力学管理中个体化治疗策略的重要性。

试验注册

UMIN 临床试验注册;UMIN000041775。注册于 2020 年 9 月 13 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fa/9509562/5099ccb68d40/13063_2022_6732_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fa/9509562/4976f2fa737f/13063_2022_6732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fa/9509562/5099ccb68d40/13063_2022_6732_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fa/9509562/4976f2fa737f/13063_2022_6732_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1fa/9509562/5099ccb68d40/13063_2022_6732_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal target blood pressure in elderly with septic shock (OPTPRESS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.老年脓毒性休克患者的最佳目标血压(OPTPRESS)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 24;23(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06732-9.
2
Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.脓毒性休克患者中血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素输注的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 28;358(9):877-87. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373.
3
Selepressin, a novel selective vasopressin V agonist, is an effective substitute for norepinephrine in a phase IIa randomized, placebo-controlled trial in septic shock patients.塞莱昔醇,一种新型选择性血管加压素 V 激动剂,在脓毒性休克患者的 IIa 期随机、安慰剂对照试验中是去甲肾上腺素的有效替代品。
Crit Care. 2017 Aug 15;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1798-7.
4
Hemodynamic Instability Secondary to Vasopressin Withdrawal in Septic Shock.感染性休克中血管加压素停药引起的血流动力学不稳定。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):761-765. doi: 10.1177/0885066617716396. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
5
EXCHANGE-2: investigating the efficacy of add-on plasma exchange as an adjunctive strategy against septic shock-a study protocol for a randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, parallel-group trial.EXCHANGE-2 研究:评估附加血浆置换作为脓毒性休克辅助治疗策略的疗效—一项针对随机、前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、对照、平行分组试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Apr 15;24(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07300-5.
6
The I-MICRO trial, Ilomedin for treatment of septic shock with persistent microperfusion defects: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.I-MICRO 试验:Ilomedin 治疗持续存在微循环缺陷的感染性休克:一项双盲、随机对照试验——随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04549-y.
7
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗国际指南:2008年版
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
8
Landiolol in patients with septic shock resident in an intensive care unit (LANDI-SEP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.重症监护病房感染性休克患者使用兰地洛尔的研究(LANDI-SEP):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 19;19(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3024-6.
9
A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.一项关于随机分配至早期目标导向性液体节约策略与常规治疗的儿科患者中感染性休克逆转是否更快的试验(SQUEEZE):一项初步随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2016 Nov 22;17(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1689-2.
10
Efficacy of methylene blue in refractory septic shock: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.亚甲蓝治疗难治性感染性休克的疗效:一项多中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):630. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08439-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic values of noradrenaline administered dose, procalcitonin (PCT) and blood lactic acid for septic shock.去甲肾上腺素给药剂量、降钙素原(PCT)及血乳酸对感染性休克的诊断价值
J Med Biochem. 2025 Mar 21;44(2):319-329. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-53853.
2
Efficacy of targeting high mean arterial pressure for older patients with septic shock (OPTPRESS): a multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial.老年感染性休克患者目标平均动脉压治疗的疗效(OPTPRESS):一项多中心、实用性、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07910-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Equilibrating SSC guidelines with individualized care.使标准化血清学转换(SSC)指南与个性化护理相平衡。
Crit Care. 2021 Nov 17;25(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03813-0.
2
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
3
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).
《2020年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》(J-SSCG 2020)
J Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 25;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7.
4
Norepinephrine Dysregulates the Immune Response and Compromises Host Defense during Sepsis.去甲肾上腺素失调免疫反应并损害脓毒症期间的宿主防御。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep 15;202(6):830-842. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0339OC.
5
Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019- results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.2009 年至 2019 年期间欧洲、北美和澳大利亚脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Crit Care. 2020 May 19;24(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02950-2.
6
Personalized Blood Pressure Targets in Shock: What If Your Normal Blood Pressure Is "Low"?休克中的个性化血压目标:如果你的正常血压“低”会怎样?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul 1;202(1):10-12. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1124ED.
7
Effect of Reduced Exposure to Vasopressors on 90-Day Mortality in Older Critically Ill Patients With Vasodilatory Hypotension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.降低血管升压药暴露对老年血管舒张性低血压危重症患者90天死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2020 Mar 10;323(10):938-949. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0930.
8
Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲和北美的脓毒性休克发病率和死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2019 May 31;23(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6.
9
Effect of Increasing Blood Pressure With Noradrenaline on the Microcirculation of Patients With Septic Shock and Previous Arterial Hypertension.去甲肾上腺素升压对合并既往动脉高血压的感染性休克患者微循环的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):1033-1040. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003795.
10
May Measurement Month 2017: an analysis of blood pressure screening results worldwide.2017 年 5 月测量月:全球血压筛查结果分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jul;6(7):e736-e743. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30259-6. Epub 2018 May 16.