• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用社交媒体促进女性检测相关沟通:工具验证研究

Using Social Media to Facilitate Communication About Women's Testing: Tool Validation Study.

作者信息

Coffin Tara, Bowen Deborah, Lu Karen, Swisher Elizabeth M, Rayes Nadine, Norquist Barbara, Blank Stephanie V, Levine Douglas A, Bakkum-Gamez Jamie Nadine, Fleming Gini F, I Olopade Olufunmilayo, Romero Iris, D'Andrea Alan, Nebgen Denise R, Peterson Christine, Munsell Mark F, Gavin Kathleen, Crase Jamie, Polinsky Deborah, Lechner Rebecca

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 26;6(9):e35035. doi: 10.2196/35035.

DOI:10.2196/35035
PMID:36155347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9555323/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strong participant recruitment practices are critical to public health research but are difficult to achieve. Traditional recruitment practices are often time consuming, costly, and fail to adequately target difficult-to-reach populations. Social media platforms such as Facebook are well-positioned to address this area of need, enabling researchers to leverage existing social networks and deliver targeted information. The MAGENTA (Making Genetic Testing Accessible) study aimed to improve the availability of genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility in at-risk individuals through the use of a web-based communication system along with social media advertisements to improve reach.

OBJECTIVE

This paper is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Facebook as an outreach tool for targeting women aged ≥30 years for recruitment in the MAGENTA study.

METHODS

We designed and implemented paid and unpaid social media posts with ongoing assessment as a primary means of research participant recruitment in collaboration with patient advocates. Facebook analytics were used to assess the effectiveness of paid and unpaid outreach efforts.

RESULTS

Over the course of the reported recruitment period, Facebook materials had a reach of 407,769 people and 57,248 (14.04%) instances of engagement, indicating that approximately 14.04% of people who saw information about the study on Facebook engaged with the content. Paid advertisements had a total reach of 373,682. Among those reached, just <15% (54,117/373,682, 14.48%) engaged with the page content. Unpaid posts published on the MAGENTA Facebook page resulted in a total of 34,087 reach and 3131 instances of engagement, indicating that around 9.19% (3131/34,087) of people who saw unpaid posts engaged. Women aged ≥65 years reported the best response rate, with approximately 43.95% (15,124/34,410) of reaches translating to engagement. Among the participants who completed the eligibility questionnaire, 27.44% (3837/13,983) had heard about the study through social media or another webpage.

CONCLUSIONS

Facebook is a useful way of enhancing clinical trial recruitment of women aged ≥30 years who have a potentially increased risk for ovarian cancer by promoting news stories over social media, collaborating with patient advocacy groups, and running paid and unpaid campaigns.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02993068; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02993068.

摘要

背景

强大的参与者招募策略对公共卫生研究至关重要,但难以实现。传统的招募方式往往耗时、成本高,且未能充分针对难以接触到的人群。诸如脸书这样的社交媒体平台在满足这一需求领域具有优势,使研究人员能够利用现有的社交网络并提供有针对性的信息。MAGENTA(使基因检测可及)研究旨在通过使用基于网络的通信系统以及社交媒体广告来扩大覆盖面,从而提高有风险个体进行遗传性癌症易感性基因检测的可及性。

目的

本文旨在评估脸书作为一种外展工具,在MAGENTA研究中针对30岁及以上女性进行招募的有效性。

方法

我们设计并实施了付费和非付费的社交媒体帖子,并持续进行评估,将其作为与患者倡导者合作招募研究参与者的主要手段。利用脸书分析工具评估付费和非付费外展工作的有效性。

结果

在报告的招募期间,脸书资料的覆盖面达407,769人,有57,248次(14.04%)互动,这表明在脸书上看到该研究信息的人中,约有(14.04%)与内容进行了互动。付费广告的总覆盖面为373,682人。在这些被覆盖的人群中,只有不到15%(54,117/373,682,14.48%)与页面内容进行了互动。在MAGENTA脸书页面上发布的非付费帖子的总覆盖面为34,087人,有3131次互动,这表明看到非付费帖子的人中,约有9.19%(3131/34,087)进行了互动。65岁及以上的女性报告的回应率最高,约43.95%(15,124/34,410)的覆盖面转化为互动。在完成资格调查问卷的参与者中,27.44%(3837/13,983)是通过社交媒体或其他网页听说该研究的。

结论

脸书是一种有用的方式,通过在社交媒体上推广新闻报道、与患者倡导团体合作以及开展付费和非付费活动,来加强对30岁及以上且卵巢癌潜在风险可能增加的女性进行临床试验的招募。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02993068;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02993068 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/db01bf7d8ff9/formative_v6i9e35035_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/c60408d56b81/formative_v6i9e35035_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/e4b8972b86ee/formative_v6i9e35035_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/679a5c9b635f/formative_v6i9e35035_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/7f0417cd7a44/formative_v6i9e35035_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/db01bf7d8ff9/formative_v6i9e35035_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/c60408d56b81/formative_v6i9e35035_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/e4b8972b86ee/formative_v6i9e35035_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/679a5c9b635f/formative_v6i9e35035_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/7f0417cd7a44/formative_v6i9e35035_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91a1/9555323/db01bf7d8ff9/formative_v6i9e35035_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Social Media to Facilitate Communication About Women's Testing: Tool Validation Study.利用社交媒体促进女性检测相关沟通:工具验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Sep 26;6(9):e35035. doi: 10.2196/35035.
2
Can Facebook Be Used for Research? Experiences Using Facebook to Recruit Pregnant Women for a Randomized Controlled Trial.脸书可用于研究吗?关于使用脸书招募孕妇参与随机对照试验的经验
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 21;18(9):e250. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6404.
3
A practical guide to implementing a successful social media recruitment strategy: lessons from the Eczema Monitoring Online trial.实施成功社交媒体招聘策略的实用指南:来自湿疹监测在线试验的经验教训。
Trials. 2022 Oct 27;23(1):905. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06839-z.
4
Comparative Success of Recruitment Strategies for an Exercise Intervention Trial Among Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Observational Study.多囊卵巢综合征女性运动干预试验中招募策略的比较成功率:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 30;23(3):e25208. doi: 10.2196/25208.
5
Generating Engagement on the Make Healthy Normal Campaign Facebook Page: Analysis of Facebook Analytics.在“让健康成为常态”运动脸书页面上激发互动:脸书分析报告
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Jan 14;5(1):e11132. doi: 10.2196/11132.
6
Online reach and engagement of a child nutrition peer-education program (PICNIC): insights from social media and web analytics.儿童营养同伴教育计划(PICNIC)的在线覆盖范围和参与度:社交媒体和网络分析的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13252-3.
7
The Search for Consumers of Web-Based Raw DNA Interpretation Services: Using Social Media to Target Hard-to-Reach Populations.寻找基于网络的原始DNA解读服务的消费者:利用社交媒体针对难以触及的人群
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 30;21(7):e12980. doi: 10.2196/12980.
8
The Use of Facebook Advertising to Recruit Healthy Elderly People for a Clinical Trial: Baseline Metrics.利用脸书广告招募健康老年人参与一项临床试验:基线指标
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jan 24;7(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7918.
9
Social Media Programs for Outreach and Recruitment Supporting Aging and Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias Research: Longitudinal Descriptive Study.社交媒体项目在老龄化和阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症研究中的推广和招募作用:纵向描述性研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jul 9;7:e51520. doi: 10.2196/51520.
10
Direct-to-Consumer Recruitment Methods via Traditional and Social Media to Aid in Research Accrual for Clinical Trials for Rare Diseases: Comparative Analysis Study.直接面向消费者的招募方法,通过传统和社交媒体,以帮助罕见病临床试验的研究积累:比较分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 14;25:e39262. doi: 10.2196/39262.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Approach to Assessing Barriers and Facilitators to Cancer Genetics Care in Black and Latino/a Individuals Impacted by Pancreatic Cancer: The Racial/ethnic Equity in GENetic Education, Risk Assessment, and TEsting (REGENERATE) Study.一种混合方法,用于评估受胰腺癌影响的黑人和拉丁裔个体在癌症遗传学护理方面的障碍和促进因素:遗传教育、风险评估和检测中的种族/族裔公平性(REGENERATE)研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Apr 27. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09018-7.
2
Influence of Breast Cancer Awareness Month on Public Interest of Breast Cancer in High-Income Countries Between 2012 and 2022: Google Trends Analysis.2012年至2022年期间乳腺癌宣传月对高收入国家公众对乳腺癌关注度的影响:谷歌趋势分析
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Aug 12;10:e49197. doi: 10.2196/49197.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Social Media Recruitment of Marginalized, Hard-to-Reach Populations: Development of Recruitment and Monitoring Guidelines.社交媒体招募边缘化、难以接触的人群:制定招募和监测指南。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Dec 2;5(4):e14886. doi: 10.2196/14886.
2
A Qualitative Study Exploring Barriers and Facilitators of Enrolling Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Trials and Biobanking.一项探索临床试验和生物样本库中纳入代表性不足人群的障碍与促进因素的定性研究。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Apr 30;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00074. eCollection 2019.
3
Monitoring Twitter Conversations for Targeted Recruitment in Cancer Trials in Los Angeles County: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.
Understanding Recruitment Yield From Social Media Advertisements and Associated Costs of a Telehealth Randomized Controlled Trial: Descriptive Study.理解社交媒体广告的招募效果和一项远程医疗随机对照试验的相关成本:描述性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 18;25:e41358. doi: 10.2196/41358.
4
Whither social media and clinical genetics?社交媒体与临床遗传学的未来走向
Am J Med Genet A. 2023 Jun;191(6):1489-1491. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63166. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
监测洛杉矶县癌症试验中用于定向招募的推特对话:一项混合方法试点研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Sep 25;7(9):e177. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9762.
4
Using social media for health research: Methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery.利用社交媒体进行健康研究:招募和干预实施的方法学与伦理学考量
Digit Health. 2018 May 7;4:2055207618771757. doi: 10.1177/2055207618771757. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
5
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.提高随机试验招募率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2(2):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6.
6
The Use of Facebook in Recruiting Participants for Health Research Purposes: A Systematic Review.脸书在招募健康研究参与者中的应用:一项系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 28;19(8):e290. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7071.
7
Health disparities and clinical trial recruitment: Is there a duty to tweet?健康差异与临床试验招募:发推文是否有义务?
PLoS Biol. 2017 Mar 1;15(3):e2002040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002040. eCollection 2017 Mar.
8
Getting Beyond Impressions: An Evaluation of Engagement with Breast Cancer-related Facebook Content.超越印象:对与乳腺癌相关的脸书内容参与度的评估
Mhealth. 2016 Nov;2. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2016.10.02. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
9
The Use of Social Media in Recruitment for Medical Research Studies: A Scoping Review.社交媒体在医学研究招募中的应用:一项范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 7;18(11):e286. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5698.
10
Paid and Unpaid Online Recruitment for Health Interventions in Young Adults.针对青年成年人健康干预措施的付费与非付费在线招募
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Dec;59(6):662-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Sep 20.