Xiao-Ming Zhang, Xin-Juan Wu, Department of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences-Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Dongdan campus), No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China,
J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(9):817-825. doi: 10.1007/s12603-022-1833-5.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to pool the effect size of the association between cognitive frailty and adverse outcomes (e.g., falls, disability, and hospitalization) among older adults.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Embase were searched from their respective inceptions to June 1, 2022. We extracted prospective cohort studies that reported the association between cognitive frailty and adverse outcomes. Random or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity were used to pool the effect sizes of independent associations of cognitive frailty, frailty only, and cognitive impairment only with each adverse outcome.
Fifteen studies involving 49,122 older adults were included in the meta-analysis. Older adults with cognitive frailty had higher odds ratios (OR) for falls (1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-2.58), disability (3.17, 95%CI: 2.24-4.48), and hospitalization (1.78, 95%CI: 1.48-2.14) compared with those without frailty and cognitive impairment. Older adults with frailty only demonstrated a high risk for falls (pooled OR 1.76, 95%CI: 1.25-2.48), disability (pooled OR 1.82, 95%CI: 1.43-2.33), and hospitalization (pooled OR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.45-1.85). The influence of cognitive impairment only on adverse outcomes was lower compared with cognitive frailty or frailty. Subgroup analyses showed that those with cognitive frailty (defined by the frailty phenotype plus Mini-Mental State Examination) were at greater risk for developing adverse outcomes.
Our findings indicate that cognitive frailty is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes (e.g., falls, disability, and hospitalization). Early screening and comprehensive intervention may improve cognitive frailty and reduce the risk for adverse outcomes among older adults.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在汇总认知衰弱与老年人不良结局(如跌倒、残疾和住院)之间关联的效应大小。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
从各自的创建日期到 2022 年 6 月 1 日,我们在 PubMed、ScienceDirect 和 Embase 上进行了搜索。我们提取了报告认知衰弱与不良结局之间关联的前瞻性队列研究。根据异质性,使用随机或固定效应模型来汇总认知衰弱、衰弱和认知障碍与每种不良结局的独立关联的效应大小。
荟萃分析纳入了 15 项涉及 49122 名老年人的研究。与无衰弱和认知障碍的老年人相比,有认知衰弱的老年人跌倒(1.82,95%置信区间[CI]:1.29-2.58)、残疾(3.17,95%CI:2.24-4.48)和住院(1.78,95%CI:1.48-2.14)的比值比(OR)更高。仅患有衰弱的老年人跌倒(汇总 OR 1.76,95%CI:1.25-2.48)、残疾(汇总 OR 1.82,95%CI:1.43-2.33)和住院(汇总 OR 1.64,95%CI:1.45-1.85)的风险较高。与认知衰弱或衰弱相比,认知障碍对不良结局的影响较低。亚组分析表明,那些认知衰弱(根据衰弱表型加简易精神状态检查定义)的人发生不良结局的风险更高。
我们的研究结果表明,认知衰弱是不良结局(如跌倒、残疾和住院)的独立危险因素。早期筛查和综合干预可能改善认知衰弱,降低老年人不良结局的风险。