Bai Anying, He Shan, Jiang Yu, Xu Weihao, Lin Zhanyi
School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Haikou Cadre's Sanitarium of Hainan Military Region, Haikou, China.
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jan 30;8:e66104. doi: 10.2196/66104.
The utility of aging metrics that incorporate cognitive and physical function is not fully understood.
We aim to compare the predictive capacities of 3 distinct aging metrics-motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), physio-cognitive decline syndrome (PCDS), and cognitive frailty (CF)-for incident dementia and all-cause mortality among community-dwelling older adults.
We used longitudinal data from waves 10-15 of the Health and Retirement Study. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was employed to evaluate the effects of MCR, PCDS, and CF on incident all-cause dementia and mortality, controlling for socioeconomic and lifestyle factors, as well as medical comorbidities. Discrimination analysis was conducted to assess and compare the predictive accuracy of the 3 aging metrics.
A total of 2367 older individuals aged 65 years and older, with no baseline prevalence of dementia or disability, were ultimately included. The prevalence rates of MCR, PCDS, and CF were 5.4%, 6.3%, and 1.3%, respectively. Over a decade-long follow-up period, 341 cases of dementia and 573 deaths were recorded. All 3 metrics were predictive of incident all-cause dementia and mortality when adjusting for multiple confounders, with variations in the strength of their associations (incident dementia: MCR odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.30-2.78; CF 5.06, 95% CI 2.87-8.92; PCDS 3.35, 95% CI 2.44-4.58; mortality: MCR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.19; CF 3.26, 95% CI 1.99-5.33; and PCDS 1.58, 95% CI 1.17-2.13). The C-index indicated that PCDS and MCR had the highest discriminatory accuracy for all-cause dementia and mortality, respectively.
Despite the inherent differences among the aging metrics that integrate cognitive and physical functions, they consistently identified risks of dementia and mortality. This underscores the importance of implementing targeted preventive strategies and intervention programs based on these metrics to enhance the overall quality of life and reduce premature deaths in aging populations.
结合认知和身体功能的衰老指标的效用尚未完全明确。
我们旨在比较三种不同的衰老指标——运动认知风险综合征(MCR)、生理认知衰退综合征(PCDS)和认知衰弱(CF)——对社区居住老年人发生痴呆症和全因死亡率的预测能力。
我们使用了健康与退休研究第10 - 15轮的纵向数据。采用Cox比例风险回归分析来评估MCR、PCDS和CF对全因痴呆症和死亡率的影响,并控制社会经济和生活方式因素以及合并症。进行判别分析以评估和比较这三种衰老指标的预测准确性。
最终纳入了2367名65岁及以上且无痴呆症或残疾基线患病率的老年人。MCR、PCDS和CF的患病率分别为5.4%、6.3%和1.3%。在长达十年的随访期内,记录了341例痴呆症病例和573例死亡。在调整多个混杂因素后,所有这三种指标都能预测全因痴呆症和死亡率,但其关联强度有所不同(新发痴呆症:MCR比值比[OR]为1.90,95%置信区间为1.30 - 2.78;CF为5.06,95%置信区间为2.87 - 8.92;PCDS为3.35,95%置信区间为2.44 - 4.58;死亡率:MCR为1.60,95%置信区间为1.17 - 2.19;CF为3.26,95%置信区间为1.99 - 5.33;PCDS为1.58,95%置信区间为1.17 - 2.13)。C指数表明,PCDS和MCR分别对全因痴呆症和死亡率具有最高的判别准确性。
尽管整合了认知和身体功能的衰老指标之间存在内在差异,但它们一致地识别出了痴呆症和死亡率风险。这强调了基于这些指标实施有针对性的预防策略和干预计划以提高老年人群的整体生活质量并减少过早死亡的重要性。