• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论坛的开发:一种新的由患者和临床医生报告的法医精神卫生服务结局测量工具。

Development of the FORUM: a new patient and clinician reported outcome measure for forensic mental health services.

作者信息

Ryland Howard, Cook Jonathan, Ferris Rob, Markham Sarah, Sales Christian, Fitzpatrick Raymond, Fazel Seena

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Crime Law. 2022 Oct 21;28(9):865-882. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962873. Epub 2021 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962873
PMID:36157331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7613634/
Abstract

Forensic mental health services provide care to people in secure psychiatric hospitals and via specialised community teams. Such services are typically low volume and high cost, often highly restrictive and average duration of inpatient care prior to discharge is long. Measuring outcomes of care is important to safeguard patients and the public, monitor progress, inform treatment plans and assist in service evaluation and planning. We describe the development in England of a new outcome measure for forensic mental health services. Patient interviews and multistakeholder focus groups were held to elicit key concepts. Thematic analysis was used to develop an outcomes framework. Fifteen patients participated in the interviews and 48 stakeholders in the focus groups. Six domains were identified in thematic analysis: 'about me, my quality of life, my health, my safety and risk, my life skills and my progress'. Sixty-two stakeholders participated in the first round of the Delphi process, and 49 completed round two. Eight of the top fifteen outcomes were shared between patients/carers and professionals. Based on these results, a new outcome measure, the FORensic oUtcome Measure (FORUM), was developed including both a patient reported and clinician reported measure. Further assessment of the FORUM's use to track patients' progress over time, and facilitate shared decision-making and care planning, is required.

摘要

法医精神卫生服务为安全型精神病医院中的患者以及通过专门的社区团队提供护理。此类服务通常量少且成本高,往往限制严格,出院前住院护理的平均时长较长。衡量护理结果对于保护患者和公众、监测进展、为治疗计划提供信息以及协助服务评估和规划而言至关重要。我们描述了英格兰一种用于法医精神卫生服务的新结果衡量指标的开发情况。开展了患者访谈和多利益相关方焦点小组讨论以引出关键概念。采用主题分析法制定了一个结果框架。15名患者参与了访谈,48名利益相关方参与了焦点小组讨论。在主题分析中确定了六个领域:“关于我、我的生活质量、我的健康、我的安全与风险、我的生活技能以及我的进展”。62名利益相关方参与了德尔菲法的第一轮,49名完成了第二轮。患者/护理人员与专业人员之间共享了前十五项结果中的八项。基于这些结果,开发了一种新的结果衡量指标——法医结果衡量指标(FORUM),其中包括患者报告和临床医生报告的衡量指标。需要对FORUM用于长期跟踪患者进展以及促进共同决策和护理规划的情况进行进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6064/7613634/7b3712cf4f8f/EMS141024-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6064/7613634/7b3712cf4f8f/EMS141024-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6064/7613634/7b3712cf4f8f/EMS141024-f001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the FORUM: a new patient and clinician reported outcome measure for forensic mental health services.论坛的开发:一种新的由患者和临床医生报告的法医精神卫生服务结局测量工具。
Psychol Crime Law. 2022 Oct 21;28(9):865-882. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2021.1962873. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
2
3
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
4
5
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
8
Safewards Secure: A Delphi study to develop an addition to the Safewards model for forensic mental health services.安全保障强化版:一项针对法医心理健康服务的安全保障模型补充的德尔菲研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Jun;29(3):418-429. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12827. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
9
Older forensic mental healthcare patients in England: demographics, physical health, mental wellbeing, cognitive ability and quality of life.英国老年法医精神卫生保健患者:人口统计学、身体健康、心理健康、认知能力和生活质量。
NIHR Open Res. 2022 Jun 22;2:9. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13248.2. eCollection 2022.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Unleashing compassionate care: canine-assisted intervention as a promising harm reduction approach to prisonization in Canada and its relevance to forensic psychiatry.释放关怀:犬类辅助干预作为加拿大一种有前景的减少监狱化危害的方法及其与法医精神病学的相关性。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 3;14:1219096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1219096. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Forensic mental health in Europe: some key figures.欧洲法医精神医学:一些关键数据。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;56(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01909-6. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
Transcending the Profession: Psychiatric Patients' Experiences of Trust in Clinicians.超越职业:精神科患者对临床医生的信任体验。
J Health Soc Behav. 2020 Jun;61(2):208-222. doi: 10.1177/0022146520918559. Epub 2020 May 5.
3
Community forensic psychiatric services in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士的社区法医精神病服务。
CNS Spectr. 2020 Oct;25(5):604-617. doi: 10.1017/S1092852919001743. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
Assessing and Improving the Quality in Mental Health Services.评估和提升精神健康服务质量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 30;17(1):249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010249.
5
How long is (too) long?多长才算(太)长?
BJPsych Bull. 2019 Aug;43(4):151-153. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2019.24.
6
Recovery-focused mental health care planning and co-ordination in acute inpatient mental health settings: a cross national comparative mixed methods study.急性住院精神卫生环境中以康复为重点的精神卫生保健规划和协调:一项跨国比较混合方法研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2094-7.
7
Public involvement in health outcomes research: lessons learnt from the development of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures.公众参与健康结局研究:从恢复生活质量(ReQoL)措施的制定中汲取的经验教训。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Apr 11;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1123-z.
8
Delphi procedure in core outcome set development: rating scale and consensus criteria determined outcome selection.Delphi 程序在核心结局集开发中的应用:等级量表和共识标准确定结局选择。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
9
Risk factors for inpatient violence and self-harm in forensic psychiatry: the role of head injury, schizophrenia and substance misuse.法医精神病学中住院患者暴力行为和自我伤害的风险因素:头部损伤、精神分裂症和药物滥用的作用。
Brain Inj. 2019;33(3):313-321. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1553064. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?定性研究数据的主题分析:它有听起来那么简单吗?
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):807-815. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5.