Suppr超能文献

基于环状DNA和常见临床检测指标的结直肠癌早期检测

Early detection of colorectal cancer based on circular DNA and common clinical detection indicators.

作者信息

Li Jian, Jiang Tao, Ren Zeng-Ci, Wang Zhen-Lei, Zhang Peng-Jun, Xiang Guo-An

机构信息

The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.

Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou 510317, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Aug 27;14(8):833-848. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i8.833.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and it is the second leading cause of death from cancer in the world, accounting for approximately 9% of all cancer deaths. Early detection of CRC is urgently needed in clinical practice.

AIM

To build a multi-parameter diagnostic model for early detection of CRC.

METHODS

Total 59 colorectal polyps (CRP) groups, and 101 CRC patients (38 early-stage CRC and 63 advanced CRC) for model establishment. In addition, 30 CRP groups, and 62 CRC patients (30 early-stage CRC and 32 advanced CRC) were separately included to validate the model. 51 commonly used clinical detection indicators and the 4 extrachromosomal circular DNA markers , , and that we screened earlier. Four multi-parameter joint analysis methods: binary logistic regression analysis, discriminant analysis, classification tree and neural network to establish a multi-parameter joint diagnosis model.

RESULTS

Neural network included carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), sialic acid (SA), and lipoprotein a (LPa) was chosen as the optimal multi-parameter combined auxiliary diagnosis model to distinguish CRP and CRC group, when it differentiated 59 CRP and 101 CRC, its overall accuracy was 90.8%, its area under the curve (AUC) was 0.959 (0.934, 0.985), and the sensitivity and specificity were 91.5% and 82.2%, respectively. After validation, when distinguishing based on 30 CRP and 62 CRC patients, the AUC was 0.965 (0.930-1.000), and its sensitivity and specificity were 66.1% and 70.0%. When distinguishing based on 30 CRP and 32 early-stage CRC patients, the AUC was 0.960 (0.916-1.000), with a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 90.0%, distinguishing based on 30 CRP and 30 advanced CRC patients, the AUC was 0.970 (0.936-1.000), with a sensitivity and specificity of 96.7% and 86.7%.

CONCLUSION

We built a multi-parameter neural network diagnostic model included CEA, IMA, SA, and LPa for early detection of CRC, compared to the conventional CEA, it showed significant improvement.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)是全球第三大常见癌症,也是全球癌症死亡的第二大主要原因,约占所有癌症死亡人数的9%。临床实践中迫切需要早期检测CRC。

目的

构建用于早期检测CRC的多参数诊断模型。

方法

共纳入59个大肠息肉(CRP)组和101例CRC患者(38例早期CRC和63例晚期CRC)用于模型建立。此外,分别纳入30个CRP组和62例CRC患者(30例早期CRC和32例晚期CRC)用于验证模型。51个常用临床检测指标以及我们先前筛选出的4个染色体外环状DNA标记物 、 、 和 。采用四种多参数联合分析方法:二元逻辑回归分析、判别分析、分类树和神经网络建立多参数联合诊断模型。

结果

包含癌胚抗原(CEA)、缺血修饰白蛋白(IMA)、唾液酸(SA)、 和脂蛋白a(LPa)的神经网络被选为区分CRP和CRC组的最佳多参数联合辅助诊断模型,在区分59个CRP和101例CRC时,其总体准确率为90.8%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.959(0.934,0.985),敏感性和特异性分别为91.5%和82.2%。验证后,基于30个CRP和62例CRC患者进行区分时,AUC为0.965(0.930 - 1.000),其敏感性和特异性分别为66.1%和70.0%。基于30个CRP和32例早期CRC患者进行区分时,AUC为0.960(0.916 - 1.000),敏感性和特异性分别为87.5%和90.0%,基于30个CRP和30例晚期CRC患者进行区分时,AUC为0.970(0.936 - 1.000),敏感性和特异性分别为96.7%和86.7%。

结论

我们构建了一个包含CEA、IMA、SA、 和LPa的多参数神经网络诊断模型用于早期检测CRC,与传统的CEA相比有显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ac3/9453338/f638844406b8/WJGS-14-833-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验