Research Unit for General Practice, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 26;22(1):1201. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08579-x.
There is growing evidence of variation in treatment for patients with depression, not only across patient characteristics, but also with respect to the organizational and structural framework of general practitioners' (GPs') practice. However, the reasons for these variations are sparsely examined. This study aimed to investigate associations of practice characteristics with provision of depression care in general practices in Norway.
A nationwide cohort study of residents aged ≥ 18 years with a new depression episode in general practice during 2009-2015, based on linked registry data. Exposures were characteristics of GP practice: geographical location, practice list size, and duration of GP-patient relationship. Outcomes were talking therapy, antidepressant medication and sick listing provided by GP during 12 months from date of diagnosis. Associations between exposure and outcome were estimated using generalized linear models, adjusted for patients' age, gender, education and immigrant status, and characteristics of GP practice.
The study population comprised 285 113 patients, mean age 43.5 years, 61.6% women. They were registered with 5 574 GPs. Of the patients, 52.5% received talking therapy, 34.1% antidepressant drugs and 54.1% were sick listed, while 17.3% received none of the above treatments. Patients in rural practices were less likely to receive talking therapy (adjusted relative risk (adj RR) = 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64-0.73) and more likely to receive antidepressants (adj RR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.04-1.14) compared to those in urban practices. Patients on short practice lists were more likely to receive medication (adj RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.05-1.12) than those on long practice lists. Patients with short GP-patient relationship were more likely to receive talking therapy (adj RR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.17-1.23) and medication (adj RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.04-1.12), and less likely to be sick-listed (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.87-0.89), than patients with long GP-patient relationship.
Provision of GP depression care varied with practice characteristics. Talking therapy was less commonly provided in rural practices and among those with long-lasting GP-patient relationship. These differences may indicate some variation, and therefore, its reasons and clinical consequences need further investigation.
越来越多的证据表明,患者的治疗方式存在差异,不仅体现在患者特征方面,还体现在全科医生(GP)实践的组织和结构框架方面。然而,这些差异的原因还鲜有研究。本研究旨在调查挪威普通诊所中,实践特征与提供抑郁症治疗之间的关系。
本研究为基于注册数据的全国性队列研究,纳入了 2009 年至 2015 年期间在普通诊所中出现新发抑郁症的年龄≥18 岁的居民。暴露因素为 GP 实践的特征:地理位置、患者名单大小和 GP 与患者的关系持续时间。从诊断之日起 12 个月内,使用广义线性模型来估计暴露与结局之间的关联,模型调整了患者的年龄、性别、教育程度和移民身份以及 GP 实践的特征。
本研究共纳入 285113 名患者,平均年龄为 43.5 岁,其中 61.6%为女性。他们由 5574 名 GP 进行管理。在这些患者中,52.5%接受了谈话疗法,34.1%接受了抗抑郁药物治疗,54.1%接受了病假,而 17.3%的患者未接受上述任何治疗。与城市实践相比,农村实践中的患者接受谈话疗法的可能性较小(调整后的相对风险(adj RR)=0.68;95%置信区间(CI)=0.64-0.73),接受抗抑郁药物治疗的可能性较大(adj RR=1.09;95% CI=1.04-1.14)。患者名单较短的患者比患者名单较长的患者更有可能接受药物治疗(adj RR=1.08;95% CI=1.05-1.12)。与 GP 患者关系较长的患者相比,GP 患者关系较短的患者更有可能接受谈话治疗(adj RR=1.20;95% CI=1.17-1.23)和药物治疗(adj RR=1.08;95% CI=1.04-1.12),接受病假的可能性较小(RR=0.88;95% CI=0.87-0.89)。
GP 抑郁症治疗的提供情况因实践特征而异。在农村地区和与 GP 患者关系持久的地区,谈话疗法的应用较少。这些差异可能表明存在一些差异,因此需要进一步调查其原因和临床后果。