• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种开源的计算工具,用于测量在单侧暴露于抗菌源的情况下细菌生物膜形态和生长动力学。

An open-source computational tool for measuring bacterial biofilm morphology and growth kinetics upon one-sided exposure to an antimicrobial source.

机构信息

The Biofilm Research Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, The Faculty of Dental Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Department of Prosthodontics, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Dental Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 27;12(1):16125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20275-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-20275-8
PMID:36167741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9515175/
Abstract

Bacillus subtilis biofilms are well known for their complex and highly adaptive morphology. Indeed, their phenotypical diversity and intra-biofilm heterogeneity make this gram-positive bacterium the subject of many scientific papers on the structure of biofilms. The "robustness" of biofilms is a term often used to describe their level of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents and various mechanical and molecular inhibition/eradication methods. In this paper, we use computational analytics to quantify Bacillus subtilis morphological response to proximity to an antimicrobial source, in the form of the antiseptic chlorhexidine. Chlorhexidine droplets, placed in proximity to Bacillus subtilis macrocolonies at different distances result in morphological changes, quantified using Python-based code, which we have made publicly available. Our results quantify peripheral and inner core deformation as well as differences in cellular viability of the two regions. The results reveal that the inner core, which is often characterized by the presence of wrinkled formations in the macrocolony, is more preserved than the periphery. Furthermore, the paper describes a crescent-shaped colony morphology which occurs when the distance from the chlorhexidine source is 0.5 cm, as well as changes observed in the growth substrate of macrocolonies exposed to chlorhexidine.

摘要

枯草芽孢杆菌生物膜以其复杂和高度适应的形态而闻名。事实上,它们表型的多样性和生物膜内的异质性使这种革兰氏阳性菌成为许多关于生物膜结构的科学论文的主题。生物膜的“稳健性”是一个常用术语,用于描述其对抗菌剂和各种机械和分子抑制/消除方法的敏感性。在本文中,我们使用计算分析来量化枯草芽孢杆菌形态对靠近抗菌源的反应,抗菌源以防腐剂洗必泰的形式存在。将洗必泰液滴放置在枯草芽孢杆菌大菌落的不同距离处,会导致形态发生变化,我们使用基于 Python 的代码对其进行了量化,并将其公开。我们的结果量化了两个区域的外围和核心变形以及细胞活力的差异。结果表明,核心区域(通常以大菌落中存在褶皱结构为特征)比外围区域保存得更好。此外,本文还描述了当与洗必泰源的距离为 0.5 厘米时出现的新月形菌落形态,以及暴露于洗必泰的大菌落生长基质中观察到的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/7f4f902ce644/41598_2022_20275_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/8d455128a224/41598_2022_20275_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/2041c3ae6704/41598_2022_20275_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/858f35605731/41598_2022_20275_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/ab08950e3457/41598_2022_20275_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/ecfffff175d5/41598_2022_20275_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/49442008c22d/41598_2022_20275_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/7f4f902ce644/41598_2022_20275_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/8d455128a224/41598_2022_20275_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/2041c3ae6704/41598_2022_20275_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/858f35605731/41598_2022_20275_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/ab08950e3457/41598_2022_20275_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/ecfffff175d5/41598_2022_20275_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/49442008c22d/41598_2022_20275_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b04/9515175/7f4f902ce644/41598_2022_20275_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An open-source computational tool for measuring bacterial biofilm morphology and growth kinetics upon one-sided exposure to an antimicrobial source.一种开源的计算工具,用于测量在单侧暴露于抗菌源的情况下细菌生物膜形态和生长动力学。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 27;12(1):16125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20275-8.
2
Effects of chlorhexidine, minocycline, and metronidazole on Porphyromonas gingivalis strain 381 in biofilms.洗必泰、米诺环素和甲硝唑对生物膜中牙龈卟啉单胞菌381菌株的影响。
J Periodontol. 2003 Nov;74(11):1647-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.11.1647.
3
Chlorhexidine Antiseptic Irrigation Eradicates Staphylococcus epidermidis From Biofilm: An In Vitro Study.洗必泰抗菌冲洗液可清除生物膜中的表皮葡萄球菌:一项体外研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Mar;476(3):648-653. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000052.
4
Chlorhexidine activity against bacterial biofilms.洗必泰针对细菌生物膜的活性。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Dec;41(12):e119-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
5
Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of AH plus with chlorhexidine and cetrimide.AH plus与氯己定和西曲溴铵的抗菌及抗生物膜活性。
J Endod. 2014 Jul;40(7):977-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.11.020. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
6
Susceptibility of Oral Streptococci to Chlorhexidine and Cetylpyridinium Chloride.口腔链球菌对氯己定和西吡氯铵的敏感性。
Biocontrol Sci. 2019;24(1):13-21. doi: 10.4265/bio.24.13.
7
Real-time microsensor measurement of local metabolic activities in ex vivo dental biofilms exposed to sucrose and treated with chlorhexidine.实时微传感器测量蔗糖暴露和洗必泰处理的离体牙生物膜中局部代谢活性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Apr;76(7):2326-34. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02090-09. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
8
In vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against selected single-species biofilms.次氯酸钠和洗必泰对选定单菌种生物膜的体外抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2006 Nov;39(11):878-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01161.x.
9
The effects of rotating magnetic field and antiseptic on in vitro pathogenic biofilm and its milieu.旋转磁场和防腐剂对体外致病生物膜及其环境的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12840-y.
10
Topography and Expansion Patterns at the Biofilm-Agar Interface in Biofilms.生物膜中生物膜-琼脂界面处的拓扑结构和扩展模式
Microorganisms. 2020 Dec 31;9(1):84. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010084.

本文引用的文献

1
The self-healing of Bacillus subtilis biofilms.枯草芽孢杆菌生物膜的自修复。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Nov;203(9):5635-5645. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02542-w. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
2
Calcium Prevents Biofilm Dispersion in Bacillus subtilis.钙可防止枯草芽孢杆菌生物膜的分散。
J Bacteriol. 2021 Jun 22;203(14):e0011421. doi: 10.1128/JB.00114-21.
3
Weaponizing volatiles to inhibit competitor biofilms from a distance.利用挥发物从远处抑制竞争对手的生物膜。
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021 Jan 5;7(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-00174-4.
4
Topography and Expansion Patterns at the Biofilm-Agar Interface in Biofilms.生物膜中生物膜-琼脂界面处的拓扑结构和扩展模式
Microorganisms. 2020 Dec 31;9(1):84. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010084.
5
Impact of spatial proximity on territoriality among human skin bacteria.空间接近度对人体皮肤细菌领域性的影响。
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2020 Aug 6;6(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-00140-0.
6
Chlorhexidine rinsing inhibits biofilm formation and causes biofilm disruption on dental enamel in situ.氯己定冲洗可抑制牙釉质表面生物膜的形成,并破坏已形成的生物膜。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Nov;24(11):3843-3853. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03250-3. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.SciPy 1.0:Python 中的科学计算基础算法。
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
8
Nutrient Level Determines Biofilm Characteristics and Subsequent Impact on Microbial Corrosion and Biocide Effectiveness.营养水平决定生物膜特性,进而影响微生物腐蚀和杀菌剂效果。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Mar 18;86(7). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02885-19.
9
The Adaptive Morphology of Biofilms: A Defense Mechanism against Bacterial Starvation.生物膜的适应性形态:一种抵御细菌饥饿的防御机制。
Microorganisms. 2019 Dec 30;8(1):62. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8010062.
10
Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria - Is There Cause for Concern?口腔细菌对洗必泰的耐药性——是否值得担忧?
Front Microbiol. 2019 Mar 22;10:587. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00587. eCollection 2019.