Zhang Kevin, Beckett Patricia, Abouanaser Salaheddin, Smieja Marek
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 30;1(1):e27. doi: 10.1017/ash.2021.194. eCollection 2021.
infection (CDI) is the leading cause of infectious nosocomial diarrhea. Although initial fidaxomicin or vancomycin treatment is recommended by most major guidelines to treat severe CDI, there exists varied recommendations for first-episode non-severe CDI. Given the discrepancy in current treatment guidelines, we sought to evaluate the use of initial vancomycin versus metronidazole for first-episode non-severe CDI.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adult inpatients with first-episode CDI at our institution from January 2013 to May 2018. The initial vancomycin versus initial metronidazole cohorts were examined using a multivariate logistic regression model.
The study cohort of 737 patients had a median age of 72.3 years, and 357 of these patients (48.4%) had hospital-acquired infection. Among 326 patients with non-severe CDI, recurrence, new incident infection, and 30-day mortality rates were 16.2%, 10.9%, and 5.3%, respectively, when treated with initial metronidazole, compared to 20.0%, 1.4%, and 10.0%, respectively, when treated with initial vancomycin. In an adjusted multivariable analysis, the use of initial vancomycin for the treatment of non-severe CDI was associated with a reduction in new incident infection (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.86; = .035), compared to initial metronidazole.
Initial vancomycin was associated with a reduced rate of new incident infection in the treatment of adult inpatients with first-episode non-severe CDI. These findings support the use of initial vancomycin for all inpatients with CDI, when fidaxomicin is unavailable.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是医院感染性腹泻的主要原因。尽管大多数主要指南推荐使用非达霉素或万古霉素初始治疗严重CDI,但对于初发非严重CDI的治疗建议存在差异。鉴于当前治疗指南存在差异,我们试图评估初发非严重CDI使用初始万古霉素与甲硝唑的情况。
我们对2013年1月至2018年5月在本机构首次发生CDI的所有成年住院患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。使用多变量逻辑回归模型检查初始万古霉素组与初始甲硝唑组。
737例患者的研究队列中位年龄为72.3岁,其中357例患者(48.4%)发生医院获得性感染。在326例非严重CDI患者中,初始使用甲硝唑治疗时,复发率、新感染发生率和30天死亡率分别为16.2%、10.9%和5.3%,而初始使用万古霉素治疗时分别为20.0%、1.4%和10.0%。在调整后的多变量分析中,与初始甲硝唑相比,使用初始万古霉素治疗非严重CDI与新感染发生率降低相关(调整后的优势比[OR],0.11;95%置信区间[CI],0.02 - 0.86;P = 0.035)。
在治疗初发非严重CDI的成年住院患者时,初始使用万古霉素与新感染发生率降低相关。这些发现支持在无法获得非达霉素时,对所有CDI住院患者使用初始万古霉素。