• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

: 论新困境及其对堕胎和生殖保健的影响。

: Navigating the New Quagmire and Its Impacts on Abortion and Reproductive Health Care.

机构信息

The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):924-928. doi: 10.1177/10901981221125430. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1177/10901981221125430
PMID:36173003
Abstract

On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision on . By voting to uphold Mississippi's law banning most abortions after 15 weeks, the Court overturned , eliminating the federal standard protecting a woman's right to abortion and reversing nearly 50 years of legal precedent. The ruling returned regulation of abortion to the states, which are responding by implementing bans or protecting access to abortion. As political and legal conflicts escalate and individual horror stories emerge, the dangerous mirage presented by this misguided legal fix to a long-standing vexing issue will come into sharper relief. The ruling is creating a new uncertain and treacherous landscape for women and health care professionals to navigate.

摘要

2022 年 6 月 24 日,美国最高法院就 案做出裁决。法院投票支持密西西比州在怀孕 15 周后禁止大多数堕胎的法律,推翻了 ,取消了保护妇女堕胎权的联邦标准,并推翻了近 50 年的法律先例。该裁决将堕胎的监管权交还给各州,各州正在通过实施禁令或保护堕胎机会来应对。随着政治和法律冲突的升级和个人恐怖故事的出现,这种对长期存在的棘手问题的错误法律解决方案所带来的危险幻象将更加明显。该裁决为女性和医疗保健专业人员创造了一个新的不确定和危险的领域。

相似文献

1
: Navigating the New Quagmire and Its Impacts on Abortion and Reproductive Health Care.: 论新困境及其对堕胎和生殖保健的影响。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):924-928. doi: 10.1177/10901981221125430. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
2
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后,与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势:州法律有多大影响?
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
3
Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.罗诉韦德案与生育医疗面临的威胁。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):557-559. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004928. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
Potential Effects of on Civil Commitment Law.对民事收容法的潜在影响。 (你提供的原文中“of”后面似乎缺少具体内容)
Am J Law Med. 2023 Jul;49(2-3):359-373. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.37. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
5
Protecting Health after Dobbs.保护“多布斯案”后的健康。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Nov;52(6):6-7. doi: 10.1002/hast.1441.
6
INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After .引言:保障生殖正义在后......
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(3):463-467. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.88. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
7
Politics of reproduction: a view from Israel on the Dobbs decision.生殖政治:多布斯裁决的以色列视角
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2023 Jan 24;12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13584-022-00550-9.
8
Mental Health Matters: A Look At Abortion Law Post-.心理健康很重要:审视堕胎法后的情况。
Am J Law Med. 2023 Jul;49(2-3):374-385. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.38. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
9
Watching the fall of Roe v. Wade: Media exposure relates to U.S. women's alcohol use intentions.观看罗诉韦德案的裁决:媒体曝光与美国女性的饮酒意图有关。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Mar;38(2):197-204. doi: 10.1037/adb0000957. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
10
People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the decision.决定前后人们对堕胎法的了解和态度。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2233794. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2233794.

引用本文的文献

1
Sterilization, Infecundity, and Reproductive Autonomy in Rural, Suburban, and Urban America: Results From a National Survey.美国农村、郊区和城市的绝育、生育力丧失与生殖自主权:一项全国性调查的结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):72-84. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70006. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
2
Medication Abortion: Current State and Changing Information on University Student Health Center Websites.药物流产:大学生健康中心网站的现状与信息变化
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):114-123. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70003. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
3
Comment on: Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
关于《罗诉韦德案》推翻后军事医疗系统中的输精管切除术发生率的评论。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan;37(1):76-77. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00943-1. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Prenatally-diagnosed renal failure: an ethical framework for decision-making.产前诊断的肾衰竭:决策的伦理框架
J Perinatol. 2024 Mar;44(3):333-338. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01779-1. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
5
Examining ethno-racial attitudes of the public in Twitter discourses related to the United States Supreme Court ruling: A machine learning approach.审视推特话语中公众对与美国最高法院裁决相关的种族态度:一种机器学习方法。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 May 4;4:1149441. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1149441. eCollection 2023.
6
The Relationship Between Access to Abortion and Mental Health in Women of Childbearing Age: Analyses of Data From the Global Burden of Disease Studies.育龄女性堕胎与心理健康之间的关系:基于全球疾病负担研究数据的分析
Cureus. 2022 Nov 13;14(11):e31433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31433. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
"Post-" Abortion Policy Context Heightens the Imperative for Multilevel, Comprehensive, Integrated Health Education.“后-堕胎政策”背景下,强化多层次、综合、全面的健康教育势在必行。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):913-918. doi: 10.1177/10901981221125399. Epub 2022 Sep 29.