Suppr超能文献

社区参与式研究在制定针对新冠疫情的就地应对措施中的益处。

The Benefits of Community Engaged Research in Creating Place-Based Responses to COVID-19.

作者信息

Dillard Dorothy, Billie Matthew, Bell-Rogers Nicole, Wang Sharron Xuanren, Harrington Melissa A

机构信息

Center for Neighborhood Revitalization and Research, Delaware State University.

Delaware State University.

出版信息

Dela J Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;8(3):60-64. doi: 10.32481/djph.2022.08.011. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The DSU COVID-19 study aims to understand the response to and impact of COVID-19 in nine underserved communities in Delaware and to inform public health messaging. In this article, we describe our community engaged research approach and discuss the benefits of community engaged research in creating place-based health interventions designed to reduce entrenched health disparities and to respond to emerging or unforeseen health crises. We also highlight the necessity of sustained community engagement in addressing entrenched health disparities most prevalent in underserved communities and in being prepared for emerging and unforeseen health crises.

METHOD

Our study is a longitudinal study comprised of three waves: initial, six months follow-up, and twelve months follow-up. Each wave consists of a structured survey administered on an iPad and a serology test. Through community engaged research techniques, a network of community partners, including trusted community facilities serving as study sites, collaborates on study implementation, data interpretation, and informing public health messaging.

RESULTS

The community engaged approach (CEnR) proved effective in recruiting 1,086 study participants from nine underserved communities in Delaware. The research team built a strong, trusting rapport in the communities and served as a resource for accurate information about COVID-19 and vaccinations. Community partners strengthened their research capacity. Collaboratively, researchers and community partners informed public health messaging.

CONCLUSION

The partnerships developed through CEnR allow for place-based tailored health interventions and education. CEnR continues to be effective in creating mutually beneficial partnerships among researchers, community partners, and community residents. However, CEnR by nature is transactional. Without sustained partnerships with and in underserved communities, we will make little progress in impacting health disparities and will be ill-prepared to respond to emerging or unforeseen health crises. We recommend that population health strategies include sustainable research practice partnerships (RPPs) to increase their impact.

摘要

目的

特拉华州立大学新冠病毒研究旨在了解特拉华州九个服务不足社区对新冠病毒的应对情况及影响,并为公共卫生信息提供依据。在本文中,我们描述了我们的社区参与研究方法,并讨论了社区参与研究在创建基于地点的健康干预措施方面的益处,这些干预措施旨在减少根深蒂固的健康差距,并应对新出现的或不可预见的健康危机。我们还强调了持续社区参与在解决服务不足社区中最普遍存在的根深蒂固的健康差距以及为新出现的和不可预见的健康危机做好准备方面的必要性。

方法

我们的研究是一项纵向研究,包括三个阶段:初始阶段、六个月随访和十二个月随访。每个阶段都包括在iPad上进行的结构化调查和血清学检测。通过社区参与研究技术,一个由社区合作伙伴组成的网络,包括作为研究地点的受信任社区设施,在研究实施、数据解读和为公共卫生信息提供依据方面进行合作。

结果

社区参与方法(CEnR)在从特拉华州九个服务不足社区招募1086名研究参与者方面被证明是有效的。研究团队在社区中建立了牢固、信任的关系,并成为有关新冠病毒和疫苗接种的准确信息的资源。社区合作伙伴增强了他们的研究能力。研究人员和社区合作伙伴共同为公共卫生信息提供依据。

结论

通过CEnR建立的伙伴关系有助于进行基于地点的量身定制的健康干预和教育。CEnR在研究人员、社区合作伙伴和社区居民之间建立互利伙伴关系方面仍然有效。然而,CEnR本质上是事务性的。如果没有与服务不足社区建立持续的伙伴关系,我们在影响健康差距方面将进展甚微,并且在应对新出现的或不可预见的健康危机时也将准备不足。我们建议人口健康战略包括可持续的研究实践伙伴关系(RPPs)以增强其影响力。

相似文献

1
The Benefits of Community Engaged Research in Creating Place-Based Responses to COVID-19.
Dela J Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;8(3):60-64. doi: 10.32481/djph.2022.08.011. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):493-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. Epub 2020 May 19.
10
Community-Engaged Research: Exploring a Tool for Action and Advocacy.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2020 Jul-Sep;21(4):452-467. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2020.1770150.

引用本文的文献

1
Using community engagement with : Framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Nov 26;42:101398. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101398. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Communities catalyzing change with data to mitigate an invisible menace, traffic-related air pollution.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17864-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in COVID-19 Mortality in the US by Race and Ethnicity and Educational Attainment.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2135967. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35967.
2
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Delaware's Underserved Communities.
Dela J Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;7(4):168-175. doi: 10.32481/djph.2021.09.022. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19-Related Infections, Hospitalizations, and Deaths : A Systematic Review.
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Mar;174(3):362-373. doi: 10.7326/M20-6306. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
Variation in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality by age in the United States: A cross-sectional study.
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 20;17(10):e1003402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003402. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Repurposing large health insurance claims data to estimate genetic and environmental contributions in 560 phenotypes.
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):327-334. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0313-7. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
Barriers to Health Care Access for Low Income Families: A Review of Literature.
J Community Health Nurs. 2018 Jan-Mar;35(1):28-37. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2018.1404832.
8
Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):e0170988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170988. eCollection 2017.
9
More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3):879-97. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0323.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验