Cigolle Christine T, Blaum Caroline S, Lyu Chen, Ha Jinkyung, Kabeto Mohammed, Zhong Judy
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2232766. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32766.
Older adults vary widely in age at diagnosis and duration of type 2 diabetes, but treatment often ignores this heterogeneity.
To investigate the associations of diabetes vs no diabetes, age at diagnosis, and diabetes duration with negative health outcomes in people 50 years and older.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included participants in the 1995 through 2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a population-based, biennial longitudinal health interview survey of older adults in the US. The study sample included adults 50 years or older (n = 36 060) without diabetes at entry. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022.
The presence of diabetes, specifically the age at diabetes diagnosis, was the main exposure of the study. Age at diagnosis was defined as the age when the respondent first reported diabetes. Adults who developed diabetes were classified into 3 age-at-diagnosis groups: 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, and 70 years and older.
For each diabetes age-at-diagnosis group, a propensity score-matched control group of respondents who never developed diabetes was constructed. The association of diabetes with the incidence of key outcomes-including heart disease, stroke, disability, cognitive impairment, and all-cause mortality-was estimated and the association of diabetes vs no diabetes among the age-at-diagnosis case and matched control groups was compared.
A total of 7739 HRS respondents developed diabetes and were included in the analysis (4267 women [55.1%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67.4 [9.9] years). The age-at-diagnosis groups included 1866 respondents at 50 to 59 years, 2834 at 60 to 69 years, and 3039 at 70 years or older; 28 321 HRS respondents never developed diabetes. Age at diagnosis of 50 to 59 years was significantly associated with incident heart disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.40-1.96]), stroke (HR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.30-2.07]), disability (HR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.59-2.72]), cognitive impairment (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.05-1.61]), and mortality (HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.29-1.71]) compared with matched controls, even when accounting for diabetes duration. These associations significantly decreased with advancing age at diagnosis. Respondents with diabetes diagnosed at 70 years or older only showed a significant association with the outcome of elevated mortality (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.17]).
The findings of this cohort study suggest that age at diabetes diagnosis was differentially associated with outcomes and that younger age groups were at elevated risk of heart disease, stroke, disability, cognitive impairment, and all-cause mortality. These findings reinforce the clinical heterogeneity of diabetes and highlight the importance of improving diabetes management in adults with earlier diagnosis.
老年2型糖尿病患者在确诊年龄和病程上差异很大,但治疗往往忽视了这种异质性。
研究50岁及以上人群中患糖尿病与未患糖尿病、确诊年龄及糖尿病病程与不良健康结局之间的关联。
设计、背景和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了1995年至2018年期间参加健康与退休研究(HRS)的参与者,这是一项针对美国老年人的基于人群的、每两年进行一次的纵向健康访谈调查。研究样本包括入组时无糖尿病的50岁及以上成年人(n = 36060)。数据于2021年6月1日至2022年7月31日进行分析。
糖尿病的存在,特别是糖尿病确诊年龄,是该研究的主要暴露因素。确诊年龄定义为受访者首次报告患糖尿病时的年龄。患糖尿病的成年人被分为3个确诊年龄组:50至59岁、60至69岁和70岁及以上。
对于每个糖尿病确诊年龄组,构建了一个倾向评分匹配的未患糖尿病受访者对照组。估计糖尿病与关键结局(包括心脏病、中风、残疾、认知障碍和全因死亡率)发生率之间的关联,并比较确诊年龄组病例与匹配对照组中患糖尿病与未患糖尿病的情况。
共有7739名HRS受访者患糖尿病并纳入分析(4267名女性[55.1%];确诊时的平均[标准差]年龄为67.4[9.9]岁)。确诊年龄组包括1866名50至59岁的受访者、2834名60至69岁的受访者和3039名70岁及以上的受访者;28321名HRS受访者从未患糖尿病。与匹配对照组相比,50至59岁的确诊年龄与心脏病(风险比[HR],1.66[95%置信区间,1.40 - 1.96])、中风(HR,1.64[95%置信区间,1.30 - 2.07])、残疾(HR,2.08[95%置信区间,1.59 - 2.72])、认知障碍(HR,1.30[95%置信区间,1.05 - 1.61])和死亡率(HR,1.49[95%置信区间,1.29 - 1.71])显著相关,即使考虑糖尿病病程也是如此。随着确诊年龄的增加,这些关联显著降低。70岁及以上确诊糖尿病的受访者仅与死亡率升高这一结局显著相关(HR,1.08[95%置信区间,1.01 - 1.17])。
这项队列研究的结果表明,糖尿病确诊年龄与结局存在差异关联,较年轻年龄组患心脏病、中风、残疾、认知障碍和全因死亡率的风险更高。这些发现强化了糖尿病的临床异质性,并突出了改善对早期确诊成年人糖尿病管理的重要性。