• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在学校环境中测量主观幸福感:学生主观幸福感问卷的波兰语版本。

Measuring Subjective Wellbeing in a School Context: A Polish Version of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire.

作者信息

Zadworna Magdalena, Kossakowska Karolina, Renshaw Tyler L

机构信息

Faculty of Educational Sciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Lodz, Rodziny Scheiblerów Avenue 2, 90-001 Lodz, Poland.

Psychology Department, Utah State University, 2810 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA.

出版信息

School Ment Health. 2023;15(1):231-246. doi: 10.1007/s12310-022-09546-x. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1007/s12310-022-09546-x
PMID:36188166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9510329/
Abstract

The Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire is a measure designed to assess adolescents' subjective wellbeing at school. The article presents our work toward adapting the SSWQ to the Polish cultural context. The Polish translation of the SSWQ, the KIDSCREEN-27, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC) were administered to 818 students aged 10-16 years, who were in Grades 5-8 of elementary school. As a result of a language adaptation process, a 16-item questionnaire was created, comprising four subscales, like the original version: School Connectedness, Joy of Learning, Educational Purpose, and Academic Efficacy. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that both the SSWQ-PL first-order measurement model, which consisted of the above four fully correlated factors, and its second-order measurement model, which structured these four first-order factors as indicators of one second-order factor (i.e., student subjective wellbeing), showed good data-model fit and high internal consistency with the present sample. Cronbach's alpha for the overall score was .87 and coefficient was .94. The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient between the total SSWQ-PL scores at two time points was.88 ( < 01), which suggests that the SSWQ-PL is reliable over time. Results showed that the SSWQ-PL had appropriate convergent and divergent validity with scores from the KIDSCREEN-27 and STAIC, which means it can be a useful measure to assess students' subjective wellbeing in school counseling.

摘要

学生主观幸福感问卷是一项旨在评估青少年在校主观幸福感的测评工具。本文介绍了我们为使学生主观幸福感问卷适应波兰文化背景所做的工作。我们对818名年龄在10至16岁、就读于小学五至八年级的学生施测了学生主观幸福感问卷的波兰语译本、儿童青少年生活质量量表27项版(KIDSCREEN - 27)以及儿童状态-特质焦虑量表(STAIC)。经过语言改编过程,形成了一份包含16个条目的问卷,该问卷与原始版本一样由四个分量表组成:学校联结感、学习乐趣、教育目的和学业效能感。验证性因素分析表明,由上述四个完全相关因素组成的学生主观幸福感问卷波兰语版(SSWQ - PL)一阶测量模型及其二阶测量模型(将这四个一阶因素构建为一个二阶因素即学生主观幸福感的指标),与当前样本显示出良好的数据-模型拟合度和较高的内部一致性。总体得分的克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)为0.87,系数为0.94。两个时间点的学生主观幸福感问卷波兰语版总分之间的皮尔逊积差相关系数为0.88(p < 0.01),这表明学生主观幸福感问卷波兰语版在不同时间是可靠的。结果显示,学生主观幸福感问卷波兰语版与儿童青少年生活质量量表27项版及儿童状态-特质焦虑量表的得分具有适当的聚合效度和区分效度,这意味着它在学校咨询中可作为评估学生主观幸福感的一项有用测评工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0242/9510329/7ad06b9e6485/12310_2022_9546_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0242/9510329/7ad06b9e6485/12310_2022_9546_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0242/9510329/7ad06b9e6485/12310_2022_9546_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Subjective Wellbeing in a School Context: A Polish Version of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire.在学校环境中测量主观幸福感:学生主观幸福感问卷的波兰语版本。
School Ment Health. 2023;15(1):231-246. doi: 10.1007/s12310-022-09546-x. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
2
Assessing adolescents' positive psychological functioning at school: Development and validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire.评估青少年在学校的积极心理功能:学生主观幸福感问卷的编制与验证
Sch Psychol Q. 2015 Dec;30(4):534-552. doi: 10.1037/spq0000088. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
3
Dominance of general versus specific aspects of wellbeing on the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire.学生主观幸福感问卷中一般幸福感与特定幸福感的主导地位。
Sch Psychol. 2022 Sep;37(5):399-409. doi: 10.1037/spq0000513.
4
Assessing the wellbeing of Chinese university students: validation of a Chinese version of the college student subjective wellbeing questionnaire.评估中国大学生的幸福感:大学生主观幸福感问卷中文版的验证。
BMC Psychol. 2021 May 1;9(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00569-8.
5
Validity and reliability of the Spanish sign language version of the KIDSCREEN-27 health-related quality of life questionnaire for use in deaf children and adolescents.用于聋哑儿童和青少年的KIDSCREEN-27健康相关生活质量问卷西班牙语手语版的有效性和可靠性。
Gac Sanit. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
6
A confirmatory factor analysis for an adapted and validated Polish version of the e.对经过改编和验证的波兰版 e 的确认性因素分析。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Jan 17;33(1):67-76. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01497. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
7
Polish Translation and Validation of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and the Tinnitus Functional Index.耳鸣障碍量表和耳鸣功能指数的波兰语翻译及验证
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 29;7:1871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01871. eCollection 2016.
8
The Construct Validity of the German Academic Self-regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) within Primary and Secondary School Children.德国中小学学生学业自我调节问卷(SRQ-A)的结构效度
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 22;8:1032. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01032. eCollection 2017.
9
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
10
The Polish version of the Düsseldorf Orthorexia Scale (PL-DOS) and its comparison with the English version of the DOS (E-DOS).《杜塞尔多夫正食症量表》波兰语版(PL-DOS)及其与英文版(E-DOS)的比较。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 May;26(4):1223-1232. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-01025-z. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
A bio-ecological framing of evidence on the determinants of adolescent mental health - A scoping review of the international Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study 1983-2020.青少年心理健康决定因素证据的生物生态框架——对1983 - 2020年国际学龄儿童健康行为(HBSC)研究的范围综述
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Nov 21;12:100697. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100697. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
New Findings From the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Survey: Social Media, Social Determinants, and Mental Health.学龄儿童健康行为(HBSC)调查的新发现:社交媒体、社会决定因素与心理健康
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6S):S1-S2. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.024.
3
An international study of middle school students' preferences about digital interactive education activities for promoting psychological well-being and mental health.
一项关于中学生对促进心理健康和精神健康的数字互动教育活动偏好的国际研究。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2019 Apr-Jun;55(2):108-117. doi: 10.4415/ANN_19_02_02.
4
The Subjective Well-Being of School Children. The First Findings from the Children's Worlds Study in Poland.学童的主观幸福感。波兰儿童世界研究的初步结果。
Child Indic Res. 2016;9(1):39-50. doi: 10.1007/s12187-015-9312-8. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
5
Contemporary Test Validity in Theory and Practice: A Primer for Discipline-Based Education Researchers.当代理论与实践中的测试有效性:学科教育研究人员入门指南。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Spring;15(1):rm1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-08-0183.
6
Assessing adolescents' positive psychological functioning at school: Development and validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire.评估青少年在学校的积极心理功能:学生主观幸福感问卷的编制与验证
Sch Psychol Q. 2015 Dec;30(4):534-552. doi: 10.1037/spq0000088. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
7
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
8
The Trajectories of Adolescents' Perceptions of School Climate, Deviant Peer Affiliation, and Behavioral Problems During the Middle School Years.青少年对学校氛围、不良同伴关系及中学阶段行为问题认知的发展轨迹
J Res Adolesc. 2012 Mar;22(1):40-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00763.x. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
9
A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.分析重测信度的基础。
Psychometrika. 1945;10:255-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02288892.
10
The relationship of schools to emotional health and bullying.学校与情绪健康及欺凌行为的关系。
Int J Public Health. 2009 Sep;54 Suppl 2:251-9. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-5421-9.