• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中移动应用程序使用者的表型分析:一项横断面研究。

Phenotyping Adopters of Mobile Applications Among Patients With COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Flora Sofia, Hipólito Nádia, Brooks Dina, Marques Alda, Morais Nuno, Silva Cândida G, Silva Fernando, Ribeiro José, Caceiro Rúben, Carreira Bruno P, Burtin Chris, Pimenta Sara, Cruz Joana, Oliveira Ana

机构信息

Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology, Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.

School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Nov 4;2:729237. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.729237. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fresc.2021.729237
PMID:36188799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9397739/
Abstract

Effectiveness of technology-based interventions to improve physical activity (PA) in people with COPD is controversial. Mixed results may be due to participants' characteristics influencing their use of and engagement with mobile health apps. This study compared demographic, clinical, physical and PA characteristics of patients with COPD using and not using mobile apps in daily life. Patients with COPD who used smartphones were asked about their sociodemographic and clinic characteristics, PA habits and use of mobile apps (general and PA-related). Participants performed a six-minute walk test (6MWT), gait speed test and wore an accelerometer for 7 days. Data were compared between participants using (App Users) and not using (Non-App Users) mobile apps. A sub-analysis was conducted comparing characteristics of PA-App Users and Non-Users. 59 participants were enrolled (73% Male; 66.3 ± 8.3 yrs; FEV 48.7 ± 18.4% predicted): 59% were App Users and 25% were PA-App Users. Significant differences between App Users and Non-App Users were found for age (64.2 ± 8.9 vs. 69.2 ± 6.3yrs), 6MWT (462.9 ± 91.7 vs. 414.9 ± 82.3 m), Gait Speed (Median 1.5 [Q1-Q3: 1.4-1.8] vs. 2.0 [1.0-1.5]m/s), Time in Vigorous PA (0.6 [0.2-2.8] vs. 0.14 [0.1-0.7]min) and Self-Reported PA (4.0 [1.0-4.0] vs. 1.0 [0.0-4.0] Points). Differences between PA-App Users and Non-Users were found in time in sedentary behavior (764.1 [641.8-819.8] vs. 672.2 [581.2-749.4] min) and self-reported PA (4.0 [2.0-6.0] vs. 2.0 [0.0-4.0] points). People with COPD using mobile apps were younger and had higher physical capacity than their peers not using mobile apps. PA-App Users spent more time in sedentary behaviors than Non-Users although self-reporting more time in PA.

摘要

基于技术的干预措施对改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者身体活动(PA)的有效性存在争议。结果参差不齐可能是由于参与者的特征影响了他们对移动健康应用程序的使用和参与度。本研究比较了日常生活中使用和不使用移动应用程序的COPD患者的人口统计学、临床、身体和PA特征。询问使用智能手机的COPD患者其社会人口统计学和临床特征、PA习惯以及移动应用程序(一般应用程序和与PA相关的应用程序)的使用情况。参与者进行了六分钟步行测试(6MWT)、步态速度测试,并佩戴加速度计7天。比较了使用移动应用程序的参与者(应用程序用户)和不使用移动应用程序的参与者(非应用程序用户)的数据。进行了一项亚分析,比较了PA应用程序用户和非用户的特征。共招募了59名参与者(73%为男性;66.3±8.3岁;预测FEV为48.7±18.4%):59%为应用程序用户,25%为PA应用程序用户。应用程序用户和非应用程序用户在年龄(64.2±8.9岁与69.2±6.3岁)、6MWT(462.9±91.7米与414.9±82.3米)、步态速度(中位数1.5[四分位间距:1.4 - 1.8]米/秒与2.0[1.0 - 1.5]米/秒)、剧烈PA时间(0.6[0.2 - 2.8]分钟与0.14[0.1 - 0.7]分钟)和自我报告的PA(4.0[1.0 - 4.0]分与1.0[0.0 - 4.0]分)方面存在显著差异。PA应用程序用户和非用户在久坐行为时间(764.1[641.8 - 819.8]分钟与672.2[581.2 - 749.4]分钟)和自我报告的PA(4.0[2.0 - 6.0]分与2.0[0.0 - 4.0]分)方面存在差异。使用移动应用程序的COPD患者比不使用移动应用程序的同龄人更年轻,身体能力更高。PA应用程序用户虽然自我报告的PA时间更多,但久坐行为的时间比非用户更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1377/9397739/5af68481444a/fresc-02-729237-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1377/9397739/5af68481444a/fresc-02-729237-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1377/9397739/5af68481444a/fresc-02-729237-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Phenotyping Adopters of Mobile Applications Among Patients With COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中移动应用程序使用者的表型分析:一项横断面研究。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Nov 4;2:729237. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.729237. eCollection 2021.
2
Profile of adults users of smartphone applications for monitoring the level of physical activity and associated factors: A cross-sectional study.成年人使用智能手机应用程序监测身体活动水平及相关因素的概况:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;10:966470. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.966470. eCollection 2022.
3
A Theory-Informed, Personalized mHealth Intervention for Adolescents (Mobile App for Physical Activity): Development and Pilot Study.一项基于理论、针对青少年的个性化移动健康干预措施(身体活动移动应用程序):开发与试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 10;6(6):e35118. doi: 10.2196/35118.
4
Who is Tracking Health on Mobile Devices: Behavioral Logfile Analysis in Hong Kong.谁在移动设备上追踪健康数据:香港的行为日志文件分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 23;7(5):e13679. doi: 10.2196/13679.
5
Who are mobile app users from healthy lifestyle websites? Analysis of patterns of app use and user characteristics.来自健康生活方式网站的移动应用用户都是谁?应用使用模式及用户特征分析。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):891-901. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0525-x.
6
Apps for IMproving FITness and Increasing Physical Activity Among Young People: The AIMFIT Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.用于改善年轻人健康状况和增加身体活动量的应用程序:AIMFIT实用随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 27;17(8):e210. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4568.
7
Adults' Preferences for Behavior Change Techniques and Engagement Features in a Mobile App to Promote 24-Hour Movement Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.成年人对促进 24 小时运动行为的移动应用程序中行为改变技术和参与功能的偏好:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Dec 20;7(12):e15707. doi: 10.2196/15707.
8
Exploring Users' Experiences of the Uptake and Adoption of Physical Activity Apps: Longitudinal Qualitative Study.探索用户对体育活动应用程序的接受和采用的体验:纵向定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 8;7(2):e11636. doi: 10.2196/11636.
9
Effects of Three Motivationally Targeted Mobile Device Applications on Initial Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Change in Midlife and Older Adults: A Randomized Trial.三款针对动机的移动设备应用程序对中年及老年人初始身体活动和久坐行为改变的影响:一项随机试验
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 28;11(6):e0156370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156370. eCollection 2016.
10
Who Uses Mobile Phone Health Apps and Does Use Matter? A Secondary Data Analytics Approach.谁在使用手机健康应用程序,这重要吗?一种二次数据分析方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 19;19(4):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5604.

本文引用的文献

1
Construct validity of the brief physical activity assessment tool for clinical use in COPD.用于 COPD 临床应用的简明体力活动评估工具的构建效度。
Clin Respir J. 2021 May;15(5):530-539. doi: 10.1111/crj.13333. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Which is the best protocol and cut-off point in the 4-metre gait speed test to discriminate exercise capacity in COPD?在 4 米步态速度测试中,哪个是最佳的方案和截断点来区分 COPD 患者的运动能力?
J Bras Pneumol. 2020;46(6):e20190232. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20190232. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
3
Mobile Apps for Management of Tinnitus: Users' Survey, Quality Assessment, and Content Analysis.
移动应用程序治疗耳鸣:用户调查、质量评估和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 23;7(1):e10353. doi: 10.2196/10353.
4
The relationship between steps of 6MWT and COPD severity: a cross-sectional study.6分钟步行试验步数与慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Dec 28;14:141-148. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S188994. eCollection 2019.
5
The role of mobile apps in allergic respiratory diseases: an Italian multicentre survey report.移动应用程序在过敏性呼吸道疾病中的作用:一份意大利多中心调查报告。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Nov;50(6):268-272. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.76. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
6
Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants.全球 2001 年至 2016 年身体活动不足趋势分析:基于 358 项以人群为基础的调查的汇总分析,涉及 190 万参与者。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Effectiveness of Smartphone Devices in Promoting Physical Activity and Exercise in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.智能手机设备在促进慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者身体活动和锻炼中的有效性:系统评价。
COPD. 2017 Oct;14(5):543-551. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1358257. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD guidelines: A systematic review.COPD 指南中的体力活动、久坐行为和睡眠:系统评价。
Chron Respir Dis. 2017 Aug;14(3):231-244. doi: 10.1177/1479972316687224. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
Who Uses Mobile Phone Health Apps and Does Use Matter? A Secondary Data Analytics Approach.谁在使用手机健康应用程序,这重要吗?一种二次数据分析方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 19;19(4):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5604.
10
Physical activity is increased by a 12-week semiautomated telecoaching programme in patients with COPD: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者通过一项为期12周的半自动远程指导计划可增加身体活动量:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Thorax. 2017 May;72(5):415-423. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209026. Epub 2017 Jan 30.