• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁在使用手机健康应用程序,这重要吗?一种二次数据分析方法。

Who Uses Mobile Phone Health Apps and Does Use Matter? A Secondary Data Analytics Approach.

作者信息

Carroll Jennifer K, Moorhead Anne, Bond Raymond, LeBlanc William G, Petrella Robert J, Fiscella Kevin

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.

School of Communication, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 19;19(4):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5604.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.5604
PMID:28428170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5415654/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mobile phone use and the adoption of healthy lifestyle software apps ("health apps") are rapidly proliferating. There is limited information on the users of health apps in terms of their social demographic and health characteristics, intentions to change, and actual health behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of our study were to (1) to describe the sociodemographic characteristics associated with health app use in a recent US nationally representative sample; (2) to assess the attitudinal and behavioral predictors of the use of health apps for health promotion; and (3) to examine the association between the use of health-related apps and meeting the recommended guidelines for fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity.

METHODS

Data on users of mobile devices and health apps were analyzed from the National Cancer Institute's 2015 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), which was designed to provide nationally representative estimates for health information in the United States and is publicly available on the Internet. We used multivariable logistic regression models to assess sociodemographic predictors of mobile device and health app use and examine the associations between app use, intentions to change behavior, and actual behavioral change for fruit and vegetable consumption, physical activity, and weight loss.

RESULTS

From the 3677 total HINTS respondents, older individuals (45-64 years, odds ratio, OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.47-68; 65+ years, OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14-0.24), males (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.94), and having degree (OR 2.83, 95% CI 2.18-3.70) or less than high school education (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.72) were all significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of having adopted health apps. Similarly, both age and education were significant variables for predicting whether a person had adopted a mobile device, especially if that person was a college graduate (OR 3.30). Individuals with apps were significantly more likely to report intentions to improve fruit (63.8% with apps vs 58.5% without apps, P=.01) and vegetable (74.9% vs 64.3%, P<.01) consumption, physical activity (83.0% vs 65.4%, P<.01), and weight loss (83.4% vs 71.8%, P<.01). Individuals with apps were also more likely to meet recommendations for physical activity compared with those without a device or health apps (56.2% with apps vs 47.8% without apps, P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The main users of health apps were individuals who were younger, had more education, reported excellent health, and had a higher income. Although differences persist for gender, age, and educational attainment, many individual sociodemographic factors are becoming less potent in influencing engagement with mobile devices and health app use. App use was associated with intentions to change diet and physical activity and meeting physical activity recommendations.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ef4/5415654/c88fd5236358/jmir_v19i4e125_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ef4/5415654/c88fd5236358/jmir_v19i4e125_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ef4/5415654/c88fd5236358/jmir_v19i4e125_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

手机的使用以及健康生活方式软件应用程序(“健康应用”)的采用正在迅速普及。关于健康应用用户的社会人口统计学和健康特征、改变意图以及实际健康行为的信息有限。

目的

我们研究的目的是:(1)在近期美国具有全国代表性的样本中描述与健康应用使用相关的社会人口统计学特征;(2)评估使用健康应用促进健康的态度和行为预测因素;(3)研究使用与健康相关的应用与达到水果和蔬菜摄入量及身体活动推荐指南之间的关联。

方法

对美国国家癌症研究所2015年健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS)中移动设备和健康应用用户的数据进行了分析,该调查旨在提供美国健康信息的全国代表性估计值,且可在互联网上公开获取。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估移动设备和健康应用使用的社会人口统计学预测因素,并研究应用使用、行为改变意图以及水果和蔬菜消费、身体活动和体重减轻的实际行为改变之间的关联。

结果

在总共3677名HINTS受访者中,年龄较大的个体(45 - 64岁,优势比[OR]0.56,95%置信区间[CI]0.47 - 0.68;65岁及以上,OR 0.19,95% CI 0.14 - 0.24)、男性(OR 0.80,95% CI 0.66 - 0.94)以及拥有学位(OR 2.83,95% CI 2.18 - 3.70)或高中以下学历(OR 0.43,95% CI 0.24 - 0.72)均与采用健康应用的可能性降低显著相关。同样,年龄和教育程度都是预测一个人是否采用移动设备的重要变量,尤其是对于大学毕业生(OR 3.30)。拥有应用的个体更有可能报告有改善水果(有应用者为63.8%,无应用者为58.5%,P = 0.01)和蔬菜(74.9%对64.3%,P < 0.01)消费、身体活动(83.0%对65.4%,P < 0.01)以及体重减轻(83.4%对71.8%,P < 0.01)的意图。与没有设备或健康应用的人相比,拥有应用的个体也更有可能达到身体活动推荐标准(有应用者为56.2%,无应用者为47.8%,P < 0.01)。

结论

健康应用的主要用户是年龄较小、教育程度较高、报告健康状况良好且收入较高的个体。尽管在性别、年龄和教育程度方面仍存在差异,但许多个体社会人口统计学因素在影响与移动设备和健康应用使用的参与度方面的作用正在减弱。应用使用与改变饮食和身体活动的意图以及达到身体活动推荐标准相关。

相似文献

1
Who Uses Mobile Phone Health Apps and Does Use Matter? A Secondary Data Analytics Approach.谁在使用手机健康应用程序,这重要吗?一种二次数据分析方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 19;19(4):e125. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5604.
2
Using Smartphones and Health Apps to Change and Manage Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Survey.利用智能手机和健康应用程序改变和管理健康行为:一项基于人群的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 5;19(4):e101. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6838.
3
Who are mobile app users from healthy lifestyle websites? Analysis of patterns of app use and user characteristics.来自健康生活方式网站的移动应用用户都是谁?应用使用模式及用户特征分析。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):891-901. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0525-x.
4
Efficacy of a Web-Based Guided Recommendation Service for a Curated List of Readily Available Mental Health and Well-Being Mobile Apps for Young People: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的针对青少年现成心理健康与幸福移动应用精选列表的引导式推荐服务的效果:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 12;19(5):e141. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6775.
5
Who is Tracking Health on Mobile Devices: Behavioral Logfile Analysis in Hong Kong.谁在移动设备上追踪健康数据:香港的行为日志文件分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 23;7(5):e13679. doi: 10.2196/13679.
6
A Mobile Phone App Intervention Targeting Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: The Efficacy of Textual and Auditory Tailored Health Information Tested in a Randomized Controlled Trial.一款针对水果和蔬菜消费的手机应用程序干预措施:在一项随机对照试验中测试的文本和听觉定制健康信息的功效。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 10;18(6):e147. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5056.
7
Mobile Phone Ownership, Health Apps, and Tablet Use in US Adults With a Self-Reported History of Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study.美国高血压患者中手机拥有率、健康类应用程序使用情况以及平板电脑使用情况:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 14;7(1):e12228. doi: 10.2196/12228.
8
Can Mobile Phone Apps Influence People's Health Behavior Change? An Evidence Review.手机应用程序能影响人们的健康行为改变吗?一项证据综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 31;18(11):e287. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5692.
9
Apps and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Adolescents' Use of Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps That Support Personal Management of Their Chronic or Long-Term Physical Conditions.应用程序与青少年:对青少年使用支持其慢性或长期身体状况个人管理的手机和平板应用程序的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 23;17(12):e287. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5043.
10
Characterizing the US Population by Patterns of Mobile Health Use for Health and Behavioral Tracking: Analysis of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey Data.通过移动健康用于健康和行为追踪的模式对美国人群进行特征描述:对美国国家癌症研究所健康信息全国趋势调查数据的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 14;22(5):e16299. doi: 10.2196/16299.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Inequalities in Mobile Health Utilization Across Phases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.了解移动健康在各阶段使用中的不平等现象:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e71349. doi: 10.2196/71349.
2
Health Promotion and Digital Tools: Analysis of Consumer Demands.健康促进与数字工具:消费者需求分析
Yonago Acta Med. 2025 Jul 9;68(3):187-196. doi: 10.33160/yam.2025.08.003. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Examining the Influence of Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors on Disparities in Health Care App Usage: Protocol for a Systematic Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Public health guidelines for physical activity: is there an app for that? A review of android and apple app stores.公共卫生活动指南:有针对那个的应用程序吗?对安卓和苹果应用商店的审查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 May 21;3(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4003.
2
Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations.评估与选择移动健康应用程序:医疗服务提供者和医疗组织的策略
Transl Behav Med. 2014 Dec;4(4):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0293-9.
3
Exploring the usability of a mobile app for adolescent obesity management.
考察人口统计学和社会经济因素对医疗保健应用程序使用差异的影响:一项系统综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 15;14:e63596. doi: 10.2196/63596.
4
A qualitative analysis of psychological and behavioral outcomes of weight-related self-monitoring among a population-based sample of emerging adults.对基于人群的新兴成年人样本中与体重相关的自我监测的心理和行为结果进行定性分析。
Appetite. 2025 Jul 8;214:108225. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108225.
5
Retention and characteristics associated with remote questionnaire completion in a general population cohort study: the project baseline health study.在一项普通人群队列研究中与远程问卷填写相关的留存情况及特征:项目基线健康研究
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 24;7:1520132. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1520132. eCollection 2025.
6
Cannabis tolerance reduces symptom relief.大麻耐受性会降低症状缓解效果。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 19;16:1496232. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1496232. eCollection 2025.
7
The impact of the Change4Life Food Scanner app on children's diets and parental psychological outcomes: a randomised pilot and feasibility study.“健康生活,食物扫描”应用程序对儿童饮食及家长心理状况的影响:一项随机试点及可行性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2215. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23400-0.
8
The influence of fitness technology use on cancer screening behaviors among American women: Mediation by social media communication and cancer worry (2017-2020).健身技术使用对美国女性癌症筛查行为的影响:社交媒体交流和癌症担忧的中介作用(2017 - 2020年)
Digit Health. 2025 May 1;11:20552076251331893. doi: 10.1177/20552076251331893. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
Implementation of a digital nurse to improve the use of digital health applications (DiGA) for older people with depressive disorders (DiGA4Aged): a randomized proof of concept study.实施数字护士以改善抑郁症老年人对数字健康应用程序(DiGA)的使用(DiGA4Aged):一项随机概念验证研究。
Trials. 2025 Apr 10;26(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08809-7.
10
Sociodemographic Differences in Logins and Engagement With the Electronic Health Coach Messaging Feature of a Mobile App to Support Opioid and Stimulant Use Recovery: Results From a 1-Month Observational Study.支持阿片类药物和兴奋剂使用康复的移动应用程序电子健康教练消息功能的登录情况及参与度的社会人口统计学差异:一项为期1个月的观察性研究结果
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 10;13:e54753. doi: 10.2196/54753.
探讨一款用于青少年肥胖管理的移动应用程序的可用性。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Jun 27;2(2):e29. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3262.
4
Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012.电子健康使用的预测因素:基于2012年健康信息国家趋势调查对数字鸿沟的洞察
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 16;16(7):e172. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3117.
5
A smartphone intervention for adolescent obesity: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.智能手机干预青少年肥胖:一项随机对照非劣效试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2014 Jan 31;15:43. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-43.
6
Evidence-based strategies in weight-loss mobile apps.基于证据的减肥移动应用策略。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):576-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.025.
7
Weight loss-there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices?减肥——有一款应用程序可以做到!但它是否遵循基于证据的实践呢?
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Dec;1(4):523-9. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0076-5.
8
Using the Internet to help with diet, weight, and physical activity: results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).利用互联网辅助饮食、体重管理及体育活动:健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)结果
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 1;15(8):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2612.
9
The promise and peril of mobile health applications for diabetes and endocrinology.移动医疗应用在糖尿病和内分泌学中的前景与风险。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2013 Jun;14(4):231-8. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12034. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
10
A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.医疗保健的一个新维度:社交媒体用于健康传播的用途、益处及局限性的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1933.