Suppr超能文献

评估硅酸钙基和传统自粘接树脂水门汀对龋损牙本质的剪切粘结强度和再矿化效果。

Evaluating the shear bond strength and remineralization effect of calcium silicate-based and conventional self-adhesive resin cements to caries-affected dentin.

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Students' Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Dec;8(6):1630-1637. doi: 10.1002/cre2.665. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Given the importance of preserving caries-affected dentin (CAD) in conservative dentistry, the shear bond strength (SBS) of different resin cements to CAD has been investigated. Here, we aimed to compare the SBS and remineralizing effect of a calcium silicate (TheraCem) and conventional self-adhesive cement (Panavia SA) on the SBS of CAD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight extracted third molars (24 sound and 24 CAD) were used. In each group, 12 teeth were prepared for bonding to TheraCem or Panavia SA. After removal of the enamel and caries, resin composite cylinders were luted on the prepared dentin. After 28 days of storage in the artificial saliva, SBS was measured and the failure mode analysis was investigated. The images of fractured sections were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray to evaluate the Ca/P weight ratio.

RESULTS

SBS of CAD and sound dentin was not different when cemented with TheraCem (9.56 ± 4.51 vs. 9.17 ± 2.76, p = .806), but the CAD showed significantly lower SBS to Panavia SA (9.4 ± 2.36 vs. 7.39 ± 2.18, p = .015). The Ca/P ratio in CAD was significantly higher when bonded to both TheraCem and Panavia-SA than that of the controls (p = .001); however, this ratio was not different for those bonded to TheraCem compared to Panavia SA.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, TheraCem as a calcium silicate cement shows better SBS to attach the restoration to CAD as compared to Panavia SA. Obliteration and mineralization of the dentinal tubules in TheraCem were also higher than in Panavia SA. However, their ability to improve the amount of the Ca/P ratio in CAD was similar.

摘要

目的

鉴于在保守牙科中保存龋损牙本质 (CAD) 的重要性,已经研究了不同树脂水门汀对 CAD 的剪切结合强度 (SBS)。在这里,我们旨在比较硅酸钙 (TheraCem) 和传统自粘水泥 (Panavia SA) 对 CAD 的 SBS 的再矿化效果和 SBS。

材料和方法

使用 48 颗第三磨牙(24 颗健康和 24 颗 CAD)。在每组中,12 颗牙齿被制备用于粘合到 TheraCem 或 Panavia SA。在去除釉质和龋损后,将树脂复合圆柱体粘接到制备好的牙本质上。在人工唾液中储存 28 天后,测量 SBS 并进行失效模式分析。使用扫描电子显微镜和能谱分析对断裂面的图像进行分析,以评估 Ca/P 重量比。

结果

CAD 和健康牙本质用 TheraCem 粘结时 SBS 无差异(9.56±4.51 vs. 9.17±2.76,p=0.806),但 CAD 与 Panavia SA 的 SBS 明显较低(9.4±2.36 vs. 7.39±2.18,p=0.015)。CAD 与 TheraCem 和 Panavia-SA 粘结时的 Ca/P 比值均明显高于对照组(p=0.001);然而,与 Panavia SA 相比,TheraCem 粘结时的比值没有差异。

结论

根据我们的结果,与 Panavia SA 相比,硅酸钙水泥 TheraCem 作为一种钙硅水泥,在将修复体附着到 CAD 上时具有更好的 SBS。TheraCem 对牙本质小管的闭塞和矿化作用也高于 Panavia SA。然而,它们提高 CAD 中 Ca/P 比值的能力相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f7f/9760150/bdc9352f8bd0/CRE2-8-1630-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验