• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Millennials Seeking Healthcare: Examining the Degree to Which Patients Utilize Online Resources.千禧一代寻求医疗保健:审视患者利用在线资源的程度。
Kans J Med. 2022 Sep 21;15(3):347-351. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.17125. eCollection 2022.
2
Patient Utilization of Online Information and its Influence on Orthopedic Surgeon Selection: Cross-sectional Survey of Patient Beliefs and Behaviors.患者对在线信息的利用及其对骨科医生选择的影响:患者信念与行为的横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 19;6(1):e22586. doi: 10.2196/22586.
3
Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.在线医生评价对患者决策影响的洞察:随机试验
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 9;17(4):e93. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3991.
4
What Do Patients Think About Their Radiation Oncologists? An Assessment of Online Patient Reviews on Healthgrades.患者如何看待他们的放射肿瘤学家?对Healthgrades网站上患者在线评论的评估。
Cureus. 2018 Feb 6;10(2):e2165. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2165.
5
Physician Beliefs About Online Reporting of Quality and Experience Data.医生对在线报告质量和体验数据的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2542-2548. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05267-1. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
6
7
Online Physician Reviews Do Not Reflect Patient Satisfaction Survey Responses.在线医生评价不能反映患者满意度调查的回复。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Apr;93(4):453-457. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.01.021.
8
A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.在线医生评分与大型医疗系统内部患者提交评分的比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2575-2579. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05265-3. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
9
Investigation of Radiation Oncologists' Awareness of Online Reputation Management.放射肿瘤学家对在线声誉管理的认知调查。
JMIR Cancer. 2019 Apr 1;5(1):e10530. doi: 10.2196/10530.
10
Word of Mouth and Online Reviews Are More Influential Than Social Media for Patients When Selecting a Sports Medicine Physician.在选择运动医学医生时,口碑和在线评论对患者的影响比社交媒体更大。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 May 30;4(3):e1185-e1191. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.022. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Online patient feedback as a measure of quality in primary care: a multimethod study using correlation and qualitative analysis.在线患者反馈作为初级保健质量的衡量标准:使用相关分析和定性分析的多方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 28;10(2):e031820. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031820.
2
A Revised Model of Trust in Internet-Based Health Information and Advice: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.基于互联网的健康信息与建议信任度的修正模型:横断面问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 11;21(11):e11125. doi: 10.2196/11125.
3
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.Yelp上对医院护理的评价可以补充并为传统的患者护理体验调查提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
4
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL MEDIA USE AND DEPRESSION AMONG U.S. YOUNG ADULTS.美国年轻成年人使用社交媒体与抑郁症之间的关联。
Depress Anxiety. 2016 Apr;33(4):323-31. doi: 10.1002/da.22466. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
5
Mobile Device Trends in Orthopedic Surgery: Rapid Change and Future Implications.骨科手术中的移动设备趋势:快速变化与未来影响
Orthopedics. 2016 Jan-Feb;39(1):e51-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151228-01. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
6
A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.医生质量报告的变化态势:对患者在5年期间对其医生的在线评分的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 24;14(1):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2003.
7
Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.对4999份在线医生评分的分析表明,大多数患者给医生的评分是正面的。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 16;13(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1960.
8
Googling ourselves--what physicians can learn from online rating sites.谷歌搜索自己——医生能从在线评分网站中学到什么。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 7;362(1):6-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0903473.
9
Will doctor rating sites improve the quality of care? No.医生评分网站会提高医疗质量吗?不会。
BMJ. 2009 Mar 17;338:b1033. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1033.
10
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

千禧一代寻求医疗保健:审视患者利用在线资源的程度。

Millennials Seeking Healthcare: Examining the Degree to Which Patients Utilize Online Resources.

作者信息

Arensberg Landon C, Kalender-Rich Jessica, Lee Jaehoon, Gibson Cheryl A

机构信息

University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.

出版信息

Kans J Med. 2022 Sep 21;15(3):347-351. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.17125. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol15.17125
PMID:36196102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9518714/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

According to the 2020 U.S. Census, a Silver Tsunami is looming, with more than 75.4 million persons aged 57 to 75 expected to need more costly medical care. However, a larger wave of 83.1 million Millennials nearing adulthood is approaching rapidly. Therefore, it is important to understand how this population finds their physician and what may influence this decision.

METHODS

Paper-based surveys were administered to adult patients at primary care and geriatric clinics located at the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City, Kansas. Questions included demographic information, utilization and influence of online reviews, and the effects negative and positive reviews have on a patient's choice of physician. Descriptive statistics were calculated for respondent characteristics and survey responses. Chi-square and McNemar's tests were performed to evaluate differences between age and gender groups, and to determine how influential review ratings are in choosing a physician for medical care. Statistical significance was determined at the 0.05 level.

RESULTS

A sample of 284 patients completed the survey (44.35 ± 17.54 years old [range = 18-90], 60.6% female, 57.4% white). Of Millennials, 67.2% read online reviews before choosing a physician. Millennials were significantly more likely to read online reviews before choosing a physician (p = 0.004) and utilize online resources to search for a new physician (p < 0.001) than older patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Millennials were more likely to research online reviews before choosing a physician. Therefore, an online review presence will be beneficial to one's practice to acquire this new wave of patients.

摘要

引言

根据2020年美国人口普查,一场“银色海啸”正在逼近,预计有超过7540万年龄在57岁至75岁之间的人将需要更昂贵的医疗护理。然而,更大规模的8310万接近成年的千禧一代正迅速到来。因此,了解这一人群如何找到他们的医生以及哪些因素可能影响这一决定非常重要。

方法

对位于堪萨斯州堪萨斯城的堪萨斯大学医学中心的初级保健和老年诊所的成年患者进行纸质问卷调查。问题包括人口统计学信息、在线评论的使用和影响,以及正面和负面评论对患者选择医生的影响。计算了受访者特征和调查回复的描述性统计数据。进行卡方检验和麦克尼马尔检验以评估年龄和性别组之间的差异,并确定评论评分在选择医疗护理医生方面的影响力。在0.05水平确定统计学显著性。

结果

284名患者完成了调查(年龄44.35±17.54岁[范围=18 - 90岁],60.6%为女性,57.4%为白人)。在千禧一代中,67.2%在选择医生之前阅读在线评论。与老年患者相比,千禧一代在选择医生之前阅读在线评论的可能性显著更高(p = 0.004),并且利用在线资源寻找新医生的可能性也更高(p < 0.001)。

结论

千禧一代在选择医生之前更有可能研究在线评论。因此,拥有在线评论将有利于个人的医疗业务吸引这新一波患者。