Piantini Simone, Aathresh Vishak Nandan, Savino Giovanni, Pierini Marco
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(sup1):S174-S180. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2117983. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
Vehicles are increasingly being equipped with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and literature highlights the utility to fit a similar active safety system in Powered Two-Wheelers (PTWs). This research attempts to analyze the efficacy of PTW Autonomous Emergency Braking (MAEB) when functioning solely, and in the case where both the PTW and Opponent Vehicle (OV) have AEB installed. 23 crashes involving motorcyclists that occurred in metropolitan areas of Italy between 2009 and 2017 were selected. The "In-depth Study of road Accidents in FlorencE (InSAFE)" provides data for the study. Each crash was reconstructed in PC-Crash 12.1 software. The obtained simulation of the crash dynamics was then used to create the dataset of cases fitted with AEB and MAEB systems. A custom MAEB system was implemented with specifications based on literature. The majority of crashes occurred on urban roads, at intersections, on dry asphalt, with clear visibility, and in daylight. The passenger vehicle was the most frequent opponent vehicle (70%). Almost half the sample involved the PTW rider traveling beyond the speed limit permitted on urban roads. MAEB was found to be applicable in 19 out of 23 real-world crashes allowing the avoidance of two crashes with the progressive triggering criteria (Time to Collision (TTC) - 1.0 s) and one crash in the case where both the PTW and OV have AEB installed with more conservative setups. MAEB simulations show important trends in the reduction of the PTW impact speed (ISR) from the conservative (TTC-0.6s) to standard (TTC-0.8s) to progressive (TTC-1.0s) triggering criteria. The mean impact speed reduction (ISR) becomes 8.6 km/h, 13.8 km/h, 19.1 km/h, respectively. The results suggested that MAEB may be extremely effective in the PTW impact speed reduction and that an earlier MAEB intervention is beneficial in achieving higher reductions in the PTW impact speed. Further, the effect of opponent vehicles also possessing AEB was studied, and it was found that this increased the likelihood of crash avoidance and greater reduction in crash severity in unavoidable circumstances.
车辆越来越多地配备了自动紧急制动(AEB)系统,并且有文献强调在两轮机动车(PTW)上安装类似主动安全系统的效用。本研究试图分析两轮机动车自动紧急制动(MAEB)单独运行时,以及两轮机动车和对向车辆(OV)都安装了AEB的情况下的效能。选取了2009年至2017年期间发生在意大利大都市地区的23起涉及摩托车手的碰撞事故。“佛罗伦萨道路事故深入研究(InSAFE)”为该研究提供了数据。每起碰撞事故都在PC-Crash 12.1软件中进行了重建。然后,利用获得的碰撞动力学模拟结果创建了配备AEB和MAEB系统的案例数据集。基于文献资料,实施了一个定制的MAEB系统。大多数碰撞事故发生在城市道路的十字路口,路面干燥、能见度良好且为白天。乘用车是最常见的对向车辆(占70%)。几乎一半的样本涉及两轮机动车骑手超速行驶。研究发现,在23起真实碰撞事故中,有19起MAEB系统适用,采用渐进触发标准(碰撞时间(TTC)-1.0秒)可避免两起碰撞事故,在两轮机动车和对向车辆都安装了AEB且设置更为保守的情况下可避免一起碰撞事故。MAEB模拟显示,从保守触发标准(TTC-0.6秒)到标准触发标准(TTC-0.8秒)再到渐进触发标准(TTC-1.0秒),两轮机动车碰撞速度降低(ISR)呈现出重要趋势。平均碰撞速度降低分别为8.6公里/小时、13.8公里/小时、19.1公里/小时。结果表明,MAEB在降低两轮机动车碰撞速度方面可能极其有效,且更早的MAEB干预有利于更大程度地降低两轮机动车碰撞速度。此外,还研究了对向车辆也配备AEB的效果,发现这增加了避免碰撞的可能性,并在无法避免的情况下更大程度地降低了碰撞严重程度。