Suppr超能文献

患者、家属与医生就晚期侵袭性癌症治疗方案进行决策协商——一项定性访谈研究

Negotiating decisions on aggressive cancer care at end-of-life between patients, family members, and physicians - A qualitative interview study.

作者信息

Haun Markus W, Wildenauer Alina, Hartmann Mechthild, Bleyel Caroline, Becker Nikolaus, Jäger Dirk, Friederich Hans-Christoph, Tönnies Justus

机构信息

Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 23;12:870431. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.870431. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced cancer do receive increasingly aggressive end-of-life care, despite it does often not prolong survival time but entails decreased quality of life for patients. This qualitative study explores the unfolding of aggressive end-of-life care in clinical practice focusing on the decision-making process and the quality of end-of-life care from family members' perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 family members (six of cancer patients with and ten without aggressive end-of-life care) at the National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg, Germany. We conducted a content analysis applying a theoretical framework to differentiate between 'decision-making' (process of deciding for one choice among many options) and 'decision-taking' (acting upon this choice).

RESULTS

While patients of the aggressive care group tended to make and take decisions with their family members and physicians, patients of the other group took the decision against more aggressive treatment alone. Main reason for the decision in favor of aggressive care was the wish to spend more time with loved ones. Patients took decisions against aggressive care given the rapid decline in physical health and to spare relatives difficult decisions and arising feelings of guilt and self-reproach.

CONCLUSION

Treatment decisions at end-of-life are always individual. Nevertheless, treatment courses with aggressive end-of-life care and those without differ markedly. To account for a longitudinal perspective on the interplay between patients, family members, and physicians, cohort studies are needed. Meanwhile, clinicians should validate patients and family members considering refraining from aggressive end-of-life care and explore their motives.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00022837, identifier DRKS00022837.

摘要

背景

晚期癌症患者确实接受了越来越积极的临终关怀,尽管这种关怀往往并不能延长生存时间,反而会降低患者的生活质量。这项定性研究从家庭成员的角度探讨了临床实践中积极临终关怀的开展情况,重点关注决策过程和临终关怀的质量。

材料与方法

我们在德国海德堡国家肿瘤疾病中心对16名家庭成员(6名接受积极临终关怀的癌症患者家属和10名未接受积极临终关怀的癌症患者家属)进行了半结构化访谈。我们运用一个理论框架进行内容分析,以区分“决策制定”(在多个选项中做出选择的过程)和“决策执行”(根据该选择采取行动)。

结果

积极治疗组的患者倾向于与家人和医生共同做出并执行决策,而另一组患者则独自做出不接受更积极治疗的决定。支持积极治疗的主要原因是希望与亲人共度更多时光。患者因身体健康迅速衰退而决定不接受积极治疗,以避免亲属做出艰难决定以及产生内疚和自责情绪。

结论

临终时的治疗决策总是因人而异。然而,接受积极临终关怀和未接受积极临终关怀的治疗过程存在显著差异。为了从纵向角度了解患者、家庭成员和医生之间的相互作用,需要进行队列研究。同时,临床医生应确认考虑放弃积极临终关怀的患者和家属,并探究他们的动机。

临床试验注册

https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00022837,标识符DRKS00022837。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验