Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107294. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107294. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
E-cigarettes may help combustible cigarette smokers switch to a less harmful alternative, or may increase the risk of subsequent initiation of cigarettes among non-smokers. Among youth, it is not clear whether both pathways occur equally, or whether one direction is more likely than the other. We used data from a prospective cohort study of youth in Southern California followed twice annually from Fall 2013 (9th grade) to Fall 2015 (11th grade) (N = 1977). A polytomous logistic regression model was used to simultaneously estimate transition rates for initiation of and abstention from e-cigarettes and cigarettes. Use of e-cigarettes was positively associated with initiation of cigarettes (OR = 7.57; 95%CI:[5.32, 10.8]) and negatively associated with cigarette abstention (OR = 0.58; 95%CI:[0.33, 0.99]) in adjusted models; cigarette use was positively associated with e-cigarette initiation (OR = 2.54; 95%CI:[1.45, 4.47]) and negatively associated with e-cigarette abstention (OR = 0.31; 95%CI:[0.17,0.57]). Uni-directional transition from e-cigarettes only to cigarettes only occurred less frequently than expected under independence (OR = 0.33; 95% CI [0.20, 0.55]), whereas simultaneously initiating both products (OR = 9.79; 95%CI:[7.22, 13.3]) and simultaneously abstaining (OR = 2.84; 95%CI:[1.50, 5.37]) were more frequent than expected. E-cigarettes were more strongly associated with subsequent cigarette initiation than the reverse, though both models indicated that use of either product seems to encourage use of the other. Models also indicated that use of either e-cigarettes or cigarettes resulted in reduced abstention of the other product. Findings suggest that prevention efforts for that continue to focus on both e-cigarettes and cigarettes are needed.
电子烟可能有助于可燃香烟吸烟者转向危害较小的替代品,也可能增加非吸烟者随后开始吸烟的风险。在青少年中,尚不清楚这两种途径是否同样发生,或者一种途径是否比另一种更有可能。我们使用了来自南加州青少年前瞻性队列研究的数据,该研究在 2013 年秋季(9 年级)至 2015 年秋季(11 年级)期间每年进行两次随访(N=1977)。我们使用多项逻辑回归模型同时估计电子烟和香烟起始和戒烟的转移率。电子烟的使用与香烟的起始使用呈正相关(OR=7.57;95%CI:[5.32, 10.8]),与香烟的戒烟呈负相关(OR=0.58;95%CI:[0.33, 0.99]);香烟的使用与电子烟的起始使用呈正相关(OR=2.54;95%CI:[1.45, 4.47]),与电子烟的戒烟呈负相关(OR=0.31;95%CI:[0.17,0.57])。从电子烟到香烟的单向转变比独立情况下预期的要少(OR=0.33;95%CI:[0.20, 0.55]),而同时开始使用两种产品(OR=9.79;95%CI:[7.22, 13.3])和同时戒烟(OR=2.84;95%CI:[1.50, 5.37])比预期更为频繁。电子烟与随后的香烟起始使用的关联比相反情况更紧密,尽管两种模型都表明,使用任何一种产品似乎都会鼓励使用另一种产品。模型还表明,使用电子烟或香烟都会减少对另一种产品的戒烟。研究结果表明,需要继续针对电子烟和香烟这两种产品开展预防工作。