• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习方法预测美国外周动脉疾病患者住院死亡率。

Machine Learning Approach to Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Admitted for Peripheral Artery Disease in the United States.

机构信息

Division of Health Services Research, Department of Foundations of Medicine New York University Long Island School of Medicine Mineola NY.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bill Wilkerson Center Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 18;11(20):e026987. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026987. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.122.026987
PMID:36216437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9673668/
Abstract

Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects >10 million people in the United States. PAD is associated with poor outcomes, including premature death. Machine learning (ML) has been increasingly used on big data to predict clinical outcomes. This study aims to develop ML models to predict in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for PAD based on a national database. Methods and Results Inpatient hospitalization data were obtained from the 2016 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample. A total of 150 921 inpatients were identified with a primary diagnosis of PAD and PAD-related procedures using codes of the () and . Four ML models, including logistic regression, random forest, light gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting models, were trained to predict the risk of in-hospital death based on a selection of variables, including patient characteristics, comorbidities, procedures, and hospital-related factors. In-hospital mortality occurred in 1.8% of patients. The performance of the 4 models was comparable, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.83 to 0.85, sensitivity of 77% to 82%, and specificity of 72% to 75%. These results suggest adequate predictability for clinical decision-making. In all 4 models, the total number of diagnoses and procedures, age, endovascular revascularization procedure, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and diabetes with complications were critical predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of ML in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with a primary PAD diagnosis. Findings highlight the potential of ML models in identifying high-risk patients for poor outcomes and guiding personalized intervention.

摘要

背景

外周动脉疾病(PAD)影响美国超过 1000 万人。PAD 与不良结局相关,包括过早死亡。机器学习(ML)已越来越多地应用于大数据,以预测临床结局。本研究旨在基于国家数据库,开发用于预测因 PAD 住院患者院内死亡率的 ML 模型。

方法和结果

从 2016 年至 2019 年国家住院患者样本中获取住院患者住院数据。使用()和 )的代码,共确定了 150921 名因 PAD 及其相关程序而初次诊断为 PAD 的住院患者。使用包括患者特征、合并症、程序和医院相关因素在内的变量集,使用逻辑回归、随机森林、轻梯度增强和极端梯度增强模型等 4 种 ML 模型训练来预测住院期间死亡风险。1.8%的患者发生院内死亡。4 种模型的性能相当,受试者工作特征曲线下面积在 0.83 至 0.85 之间,敏感性在 77%至 82%之间,特异性在 72%至 75%之间。这些结果表明对临床决策具有足够的可预测性。在所有 4 种模型中,总诊断和程序数量、年龄、血管内血运重建程序、充血性心力衰竭、糖尿病和糖尿病合并症是院内死亡率的关键预测因素。

结论

本研究证明了 ML 预测 PAD 初诊患者院内死亡率的可行性。研究结果突出了 ML 模型在识别预后不良的高危患者和指导个性化干预方面的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa3/9673668/65512c30837c/JAH3-11-e026987-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa3/9673668/5abf46969fea/JAH3-11-e026987-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa3/9673668/65512c30837c/JAH3-11-e026987-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa3/9673668/5abf46969fea/JAH3-11-e026987-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa3/9673668/65512c30837c/JAH3-11-e026987-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Approach to Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Admitted for Peripheral Artery Disease in the United States.机器学习方法预测美国外周动脉疾病患者住院死亡率。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 18;11(20):e026987. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026987. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Machine Learning Accurately Predicts Short-Term Outcomes Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures.机器学习准确预测踝关节骨折切开复位内固定术后的短期预后。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 May;58(3):410-416. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.004. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
3
Machine learning as a tool to identify inpatients who are not at risk of adverse drug events in a large dataset of a tertiary care hospital in the USA.机器学习在识别美国一家三级护理医院大型数据集中心非药物不良事件风险患者中的应用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Dec;89(12):3523-3538. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15846. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
4
Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes of Endovascular Intervention for Patients With PAD.机器学习预测 PAD 患者血管内介入治疗的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242350. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2350.
5
Impact of the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM transition on the incidence of severe maternal morbidity among delivery hospitalizations in the United States.从国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD - 9 - CM)转换到国际疾病分类第十版临床修订本(ICD - 10 - CM)对美国分娩住院期间严重孕产妇发病率的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):422.e1-422.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.036. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
6
Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes After Percutaneous Revascularization for Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients With a Body Mass Index of >30 kg/m Versus ≤30 kg/m (from the National Inpatient Sample).体重指数>30kg/m²与≤30kg/m²的外周动脉疾病患者经皮血管重建术后院内结局比较(来自全国住院患者样本)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1648-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.065. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
8
Nationwide Trends of Hospital Admission and Outcomes Among Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: From 2003-2011.全国范围内重症肢体缺血患者住院和结局的趋势:2003-2011 年。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 26;67(16):1901-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.040. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
9
Trends and perioperative outcomes of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) undergoing lower extremity revascularization.下肢血运重建术治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者的趋势和围手术期结果。
Vasc Med. 2020 Dec;25(6):527-533. doi: 10.1177/1358863X20952856. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Machine ​learning algorithms for claims data-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure.基于索赔数据的机器学习算法预测心力衰竭患者住院死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):3026-3036. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13398. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
SpaCE: a spatial counterfactual explainable deep learning model for predicting out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival outcome.SpaCE:一种用于预测院外心脏骤停生存结果的空间反事实可解释深度学习模型。
Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2024.2443757.
2
Validation of Codes to Distinguish Between Claudication and Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Vascular Intervention Using Medicare-Matched Registry Data.利用医疗保险匹配登记数据验证区分接受外周血管介入治疗患者间歇性跛行和慢性肢体威胁性缺血的编码
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Jul;18(7):e011467. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011467. Epub 2025 May 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Machine learning to predict end stage kidney disease in chronic kidney disease.机器学习预测慢性肾脏病的终末期肾病。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8377. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12316-z.
2
Impact of to Coding Transition on Prevalence Trends in Neurology.从[具体编码]到[具体编码]的编码转换对神经病学患病率趋势的影响 。 (注:原文中“to”前后的具体编码缺失,翻译时保留原文格式以便理解,实际翻译需补充完整准确的编码内容)
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;11(5):e612-e619. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001046.
3
Capturing Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Stroke at the to Transition: Case Volume Discontinuity in the United States National Inpatient Sample.
Machine learning prediction of premature death from multimorbidity among people with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
炎症性肠病患者多种疾病导致过早死亡的机器学习预测:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2025 Mar 24;197(11):E286-E297. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241117.
4
Machine Learning in Vascular Medicine: Optimizing Clinical Strategies for Peripheral Artery Disease.血管医学中的机器学习:优化外周动脉疾病的临床策略
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2024;18(12):187-195. doi: 10.1007/s12170-024-00752-7. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
5
Machine learning to predict the occurrence of thyroid nodules: towards a quantitative approach for judicious utilization of thyroid ultrasonography.机器学习预测甲状腺结节的发生:为甲状腺超声检查的合理应用提供定量方法。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 May 7;15:1385836. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1385836. eCollection 2024.
6
Long-Term Mortality Predictors Using a Machine-Learning Approach in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia After Peripheral Vascular Intervention.基于机器学习的外周血管介入治疗后慢性肢体严重缺血患者长期死亡率预测因子。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e034477. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034477. Epub 2024 May 18.
7
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology and Atherosclerosis in the Context of Precision Medicine: A Scoping Review.精准医学背景下心脏病学与动脉粥样硬化领域的人工智能:一项范围综述
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2024 Apr 30;2024:2991243. doi: 10.1155/2024/2991243. eCollection 2024.
8
Machine learning-based predictor for neurologic outcomes in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.基于机器学习的体外心肺复苏患者神经功能预后预测模型
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 17;10:1278374. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1278374. eCollection 2023.
9
Development and economic assessment of machine learning models to predict glycosylated hemoglobin in type 2 diabetes.用于预测2型糖尿病糖化血红蛋白的机器学习模型的开发与经济评估
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 30;14:1216182. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1216182. eCollection 2023.
10
Machine learning to predict occult metastatic lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.基于机器学习的胸段食管鳞癌喉返神经隐匿性转移淋巴结预测
BMC Cancer. 2023 Mar 2;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10670-3.
捕捉急性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗的至过渡期:美国国家住院患者样本中的病例量不连续。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):e021614. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021614. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
4
Disparities in Peripheral Artery Disease Hospitalizations Identified Among Understudied Race-Ethnicity Groups.在研究较少的种族/族裔群体中发现外周动脉疾病住院治疗存在差异。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 May 24;8:692236. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.692236. eCollection 2021.
5
Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction.利用机器学习模型预测急性心肌梗死后的死亡。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):633-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0122.
6
Weekend Effect on in-Hospital Mortality for Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in US Rural and Urban Hospitals.美国农村和城市医院缺血性和出血性脑卒中患者住院病死率的周末效应。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Oct;29(10):105106. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105106. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
A meta-analysis of mortality after minor amputation among patients with diabetes and/or peripheral vascular disease.糖尿病和/或外周血管疾病患者小截肢术后死亡率的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):2197-2207. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.086. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
A comparison of regularized logistic regression and random forest machine learning models for daytime diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.正则化逻辑回归和随机森林机器学习模型在日间阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断中的比较。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020 Oct;58(10):2517-2529. doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02206-9. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Association of weekend admission and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with sepsis: An observational study.脓毒症住院患者周末入院与临床结局的关联:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 26;99(26):e20842. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020842.
10
Association between admission time and in-hospital mortality in acute aortic dissection patients: A retrospective cohort study.急性主动脉夹层患者入院时间与住院死亡率的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Heart Lung. 2020 Sep-Oct;49(5):651-659. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 May 22.