• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于国际通用协议的 EQ-5D-Y 评估调查:日本制定价值体系。

Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health (C2H), National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan.

Department of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2021 Jul;41(5):597-606. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211001859. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X211001859
PMID:33754886
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8191148/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

EQ-5D-Y is a preference-based measure for children and adolescents (aged 8-15 y). This is the first study to develop an EQ-5D-Y value set for converting EQ-5D-Y responses to index values.

METHODS

We recruited 1047 respondents (aged 20-79 y) from the general population, stratified by gender and age group, in 5 Japanese cities. All data were collected through face-to-face surveys. Respondents were asked to value EQ-5D-Y states for a hypothetical 10-y-old child from a proxy perspective using composite time tradeoff (cTTO) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The discrete choice data were analyzed using a mixed logit model. Latent DCE values were then converted to a 0 (death)/1 (full health) scale by mapping them to the cTTO values.

RESULTS

The mean observed cTTO value of the worst health state [33333] was 0.20. Analysis of the DCE data showed that the coefficients of the domains related to mental functions ("Having pain or discomfort" and "Feeling worried, sad, or unhappy") were larger than those for the domains related to physical and social functions. By converting latent DCE values to a utility scale, we constructed a value set for EQ-5D-Y. No inconsistencies were observed. The minimum predicted score was 0.288 [33333], and the second-best score was 0.957 [12111].

CONCLUSION

A value set for EQ-5D-Y was successfully constructed. This is the first survey of an EQ-5D-Y value set. Interpreting the differences between EQ-5D-Y and EQ-5D-5L value sets is a future task with implications for health care policy.

摘要

背景

EQ-5D-Y 是一种针对儿童和青少年(8-15 岁)的偏好测量工具。这是第一项旨在开发 EQ-5D-Y 量表的研究,旨在将 EQ-5D-Y 的反应转化为指数值。

方法

我们在日本的 5 个城市中,按性别和年龄组分层,招募了 1047 名 20-79 岁的一般人群受访者。所有数据均通过面对面调查收集。受访者被要求从代理的角度使用综合时间权衡(cTTO)和离散选择实验(DCE)对假设的 10 岁儿童的 EQ-5D-Y 状态进行估值。离散选择数据使用混合对数模型进行分析。然后通过将潜在 DCE 值映射到 cTTO 值,将其转换为 0(死亡)/1(完全健康)的量表。

结果

最差健康状态[33333]的平均观察到的 cTTO 值为 0.20。DCE 数据分析表明,与身体和社会功能相关的领域(“有疼痛或不适”和“感到担忧、悲伤或不快乐”)的域相关的系数大于与心理功能相关的域。通过将潜在的 DCE 值转换为效用量表,我们构建了 EQ-5D-Y 的价值体系。未观察到不一致。最低预测分数为 0.288[33333],第二高分数为 0.957[12111]。

结论

成功构建了 EQ-5D-Y 的价值体系。这是对 EQ-5D-Y 价值体系的首次调查。解释 EQ-5D-Y 和 EQ-5D-5L 价值体系之间的差异是未来的任务,对医疗保健政策具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b1/8191148/2b1d0e346200/10.1177_0272989X211001859-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b1/8191148/b6ba88ebb3bf/10.1177_0272989X211001859-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b1/8191148/655d4d56d959/10.1177_0272989X211001859-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b1/8191148/270b9ffef7a5/10.1177_0272989X211001859-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b1/8191148/2b1d0e346200/10.1177_0272989X211001859-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b1/8191148/b6ba88ebb3bf/10.1177_0272989X211001859-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b1/8191148/655d4d56d959/10.1177_0272989X211001859-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b1/8191148/270b9ffef7a5/10.1177_0272989X211001859-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b1/8191148/2b1d0e346200/10.1177_0272989X211001859-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan.基于国际通用协议的 EQ-5D-Y 评估调查:日本制定价值体系。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jul;41(5):597-606. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211001859. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.基于DCE和/或TTO数据的价值集比较:日本EQ-5D-5L健康状态评分
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):648-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1834. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
3
EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Germany.德国 EQ-5D-Y 量表值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):217-229. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01143-9. Epub 2022 May 23.
4
Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in Hungary.匈牙利的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 量表值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01190-2. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Indonesia by Mapping the DCE onto TTO Values.基于离散选择实验(DCE)到时间权衡(TTO)值的映射来估计印度尼西亚的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):157-167. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01210-1. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China.估算中国的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):147-155. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01216-9. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
7
Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Brazil.估算巴西的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Sep;42(9):1047-1063. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01404-9. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
8
EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚 EQ-5D-Y 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Apr;39(4):463-471. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00994-4. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.一种用于获取健康状态偏好的混合建模方法:葡萄牙 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
Accounting for Unobservable Preference Heterogeneity and Evaluating Alternative Anchoring Approaches to Estimate Country-Specific EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: A Case Study Using Spanish Preference Data.考虑不可观测的偏好异质性并评估替代的锚定方法来估计特定国家的 EQ-5D-Y 值集:使用西班牙偏好数据的案例研究。
Value Health. 2022 May;25(5):835-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
An Australian Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.EQ-5D-Y-3L的澳大利亚价值集。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jul 15;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02402-x.
2
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
3
Association of health literacy with quality of life and health outcomes among school-age children in Japan: A cross-sectional study.日本学龄儿童健康素养与生活质量及健康结局的关联:一项横断面研究。

本文引用的文献

1
An exploration of methods for obtaining 0 = dead anchors for latent scale EQ-5D-Y values.探索获取潜在规模 EQ-5D-Y 值的 0= 死亡锚点的方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;21(7):1091-1103. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01205-9. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
2
International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.国际 EQ-5D-Y-3L 量表评估协议
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jul;38(7):653-663. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00909-3.
3
A two-step procedure to generate utilities for the Infant health-related Quality of life Instrument (IQI).生成婴儿健康相关生活质量量表(IQI)效用的两步程序。
PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0324456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324456. eCollection 2025.
4
Assessing the Value for Money of Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Gaucher Disease Types 1 and 3b: Can Expanded Coverage Be Justified?评估1型和3b型戈谢病中酶替代疗法的性价比:扩大覆盖范围是否合理?
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00579-x.
5
Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D Instruments in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.儿童和青少年EQ-5D量表的测量属性:一项系统评价
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Apr 19. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00953-0.
6
The Lumbar Roll May Support Maintaining an Upright Posture of the Neck During a Prolonged Typing Task Among Individuals With Neck Symptoms: A Randomized Crossover Two-Arm Experimental Study.腰部支撑垫可能有助于有颈部症状的个体在长时间打字任务中保持颈部直立姿势:一项随机交叉双臂实验研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 9;17(1):e77179. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77179. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
EQ‑5D‑Y-3L population norms for children and adolescents in Jiangsu, China.中国江苏儿童和青少年的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 群体常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Nov 28;22(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02322-2.
8
Valuation survey for SF-6Dv2 in Japan based on the international protocol.基于国际协议的日本SF-6Dv2估值调查。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03830-w. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
9
Comparison of EQ-5D-Y-3L Utility Scores Using Nine Country-Specific Value Sets in Chinese Adolescents.在中国青少年中使用九种特定国家价值集比较EQ-5D-Y-3L效用评分
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Feb;43(2):209-221. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01451-2. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
10
Threshold and Standard Error of Measurement for Relative Rest Time of Pericervical Muscles During Prolonged Computer-Typing Tasks in Individuals With Neck Symptoms.颈部有症状个体在长时间计算机打字任务中宫颈周围肌肉相对休息时间的测量阈值和标准误差
Cureus. 2024 Sep 10;16(9):e69119. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69119. eCollection 2024 Sep.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 3;15(4):e0230852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230852. eCollection 2020.
4
Review of Valuation Methods of Preference-Based Measures of Health for Economic Evaluation in Child and Adolescent Populations: Where are We Now and Where are We Going?基于偏好的儿童和青少年健康衡量指标的经济评价估值方法综述:我们现在在哪里,我们要去哪里?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Apr;38(4):325-340. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00873-7.
5
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the EQ-5D-Y by self-report and proxy-report: reliability and construct validity.日本版 EQ-5D-Y 自评和代理报告的心理测量学特性:信度和结构效度。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Nov;28(11):3093-3105. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02238-1. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
6
EQ-5D-Y as a Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Children and Adolescents: The Instrument's Characteristics, Development, Current Use, and Challenges of Developing Its Value Set.EQ-5D-Y 作为儿童和青少年健康相关生活质量的工具:工具的特点、发展、当前应用以及制定其价值体系的挑战。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.11.001.
7
Overview, Update, and Lessons Learned From the International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol.概述、更新以及从国际 EQ-5D-5L 估值工作中吸取的经验教训:EQ-5D-5L 估值议定书第 2 版。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
8
Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective.欧洲五维健康量表青年版(EQ-5D-Y)和欧洲五维健康量表 3 级版(EQ-5D-3L)健康状态的估值:措辞和视角的影响。
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
9
Scoring the Child Health Utility 9D instrument: estimation of a Chinese child and adolescent-specific tariff.儿童健康效用 9D 量表评分:中国儿童和青少年特异性量表的制定。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):163-176. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2032-z. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Quality Control Process for EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.EQ-5D-5L 估值研究的质量控制流程
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):466-473. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Dec 22.