Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 12;17(10):e0275744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275744. eCollection 2022.
Questions on the timing and the center of the Indo-European language dispersal are central to debates on the formation of the European and Asian linguistic landscapes and are deeply intertwined with questions on the archaeology and population history of these continents. Recent palaeogenomic studies support scenarios in which the core Indo-European languages spread with the expansion of Early Bronze Age Yamnaya herders that originally inhabited the East European steppes. Questions on the Yamnaya and Pre-Yamnaya locations of the language community that ultimately gave rise to the Indo-European language family are heavily dependent on linguistic reconstruction of the subsistence of Proto-Indo-European speakers. A central question, therefore, is how important the role of agriculture was among the speakers of this protolanguage. In this study, we perform a qualitative etymological analysis of all previously postulated Proto-Indo-European terminology related to cereal cultivation and cereal processing. On the basis of the evolution of the subsistence strategies of consecutive stages of the protolanguage, we find that one or perhaps two cereal terms can be reconstructed for the basal Indo-European stage, also known as Indo-Anatolian, but that core Indo-European, here also including Tocharian, acquired a more elaborate set of terms. Thus, we linguistically document an important economic shift from a mostly non-agricultural to a mixed agro-pastoral economy between the basal and core Indo-European speech communities. It follows that the early, eastern Yamnaya of the Don-Volga steppe, with its lack of evidence for agricultural practices, does not offer a perfect archaeological proxy for the core Indo-European language community and that this stage of the language family more likely reflects a mixed subsistence as proposed for western Yamnaya groups around or to the west of the Dnieper River.
印欧语系的扩散时间和中心问题是关于欧洲和亚洲语言景观形成的争论的核心,并且与这些大陆的考古学和人口历史问题密切相关。最近的古基因组研究支持这样的情景,即核心印欧语系随着最初居住在东欧草原上的早期青铜时代亚姆纳亚牧民的扩张而传播。关于最终产生印欧语系的语言社区的亚姆纳亚和前亚姆纳亚的位置的问题,严重依赖于原始印欧语使用者的生存的语言重建。因此,一个核心问题是这种原始语言的使用者中农业的作用有多大。在这项研究中,我们对所有先前假定的与谷物种植和谷物加工有关的原始印欧语术语进行了定性词源分析。根据原始语言连续阶段的生存策略的演变,我们发现可以为基础印欧语阶段(也称为印度-安纳托利亚语)重建一个或两个可能的谷物术语,但是核心印欧语,这里也包括吐火罗语,获得了更精细的术语集。因此,我们从语言学上记录了在基础和核心印欧语语言社区之间,从以非农业为主的经济向混合农业-畜牧业经济的重要经济转变。由此可以推断,顿河-伏尔加草原上的早期、东部的亚姆纳亚缺乏农业实践的证据,因此并不是核心印欧语语言社区的完美考古学代理,而且该语言家族的这一阶段更可能反映出与德涅斯特河周围或以西的亚姆纳亚群体类似或相似的混合生存方式。