Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Department of Biology, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1540.
It is unclear whether Indo-European languages in Europe spread from the Pontic steppes in the late Neolithic, or from Anatolia in the Early Neolithic. Under the former hypothesis, people of the Globular Amphorae culture (GAC) would be descended from Eastern ancestors, likely representing the Yamnaya culture. However, nuclear (six individuals typed for 597 573 SNPs) and mitochondrial (11 complete sequences) DNA from the GAC appear closer to those of earlier Neolithic groups than to the DNA of all other populations related to the Pontic steppe migration. Explicit comparisons of alternative demographic models via approximate Bayesian computation confirmed this pattern. These results are not in contrast to Late Neolithic gene flow from the Pontic steppes into Central Europe. However, they add nuance to this model, showing that the eastern affinities of the GAC in the archaeological record reflect cultural influences from other groups from the East, rather than the movement of people.
欧洲的印欧语系是在新石器时代晚期从黑海草原传播而来,还是在新石器时代早期从安纳托利亚传播而来,目前尚不清楚。在前一种假设下,球状陶器文化(GAC)的人是来自东方的祖先,可能代表了扬那亚文化。然而,来自 GAC 的核 DNA(6 人被检测了 597573 个 SNPs)和线粒体 DNA(11 个完整序列)与新石器时代早期群体的 DNA更为接近,而与所有其他与黑海草原迁徙有关的人群的 DNA则不那么接近。通过近似贝叶斯计算对替代人口统计学模型的明确比较证实了这一模式。这些结果与新石器时代晚期从黑海草原向中欧的基因流并不矛盾。然而,它们为这一模型增添了微妙之处,表明考古记录中 GAC 的东部特征反映了来自东方的其他群体的文化影响,而不是人口的迁移。