Randell Rebecca, Alvarado Natasha, McVey Lynn, Ruddle Roy A, Doherty Patrick, Gale Chris, Mamas Mamas, Dowding Dawn
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of York, York, UK.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020 Mar 4;2019:735-744. eCollection 2019.
Healthcare organizations worldwide use quality dashboards to provide feedback to clinical teams and managers, in order to monitor care quality and stimulate quality improvement. However, there is limited evidence regarding the impact of quality dashboards and audit and feedback research focuses on feedback to individual clinicians, rather than to clinical and managerial teams. Consequently, we know little about what features a quality dashboard needs in order to provide benefit. We conducted 54 interviews across five healthcare organizations in the National Health Service in England, interviewing personnel at different levels of the organization, to understand how national (UK) clinical audit data are used for quality improvement and factors that support or constrain use of these data. The findings, organized around the themes of choosing performance indicators, assessing performance, identifying causes, communicating from ward to board, and data quality, have implications for the design of quality dashboards, which we have translated into a series of requirements.
全球的医疗保健机构使用质量仪表盘向临床团队和管理人员提供反馈,以监测护理质量并促进质量改进。然而,关于质量仪表盘影响的证据有限,且审计与反馈研究侧重于向个体临床医生提供反馈,而非向临床和管理团队。因此,我们对质量仪表盘为产生效益所需具备的特征知之甚少。我们在英国国家医疗服务体系的五个医疗保健机构中进行了54次访谈,采访了机构内不同层级的人员,以了解英国的国家临床审计数据是如何用于质量改进的,以及支持或限制这些数据使用的因素。围绕选择绩效指标、评估绩效、确定原因、从病房到董事会的沟通以及数据质量等主题得出的研究结果,对质量仪表盘的设计具有启示意义,我们已将其转化为一系列要求。