Faculty of Social Science, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 4;19(19):12698. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912698.
(1) Schools have a significant role in violence prevention activities. This study aimed to first identify profiles of Finnish comprehensive schools based on school violence. The second aim was to examine the associations between profiles concerning health promotion actions, reactive or punitive actions, and school characteristics. (2) The study used the large-scale, nationally representative Benchmarking System of Health Promotion Capacity-Building (BSHPCB) data ( = 2057 schools) completed by the school's principal together with a student welfare team. The data was analyzed by cluster analysis and Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests. For post hoc testing, Fisher's exact test with odds ratios and Mann-Whitney U-test were used. (3) The cluster analysis yielded five profiles of school violence: "No violence", "Adolescent violence" (violence both among pupils and from pupils towards staff, but not inappropriate behavior from school staff towards pupils), "Not known" (principals either did not respond to these questions or they did not know whether there had been any school violence incidents), "Peer violence" (school violence occurred among pupils but not from pupils towards staff, nor inappropriate behavior from school staff towards pupils), and "All violence" (all types of school violence and inappropriate behavior from school staff towards pupils). These clusters differed according to type of school and municipality. Additionally, both management and monitoring as health promotion actions were related to higher incidence of school violence whereas other actions, such as commitment, resources, common practices, and participation were not related to school violence. (4) The findings of this study indicate that schools have different profiles in terms of school violence and providing evidence and guidance for school violence prevention work.
(1) 学校在预防暴力活动方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在首先根据学校暴力情况确定芬兰综合学校的类型。第二个目的是研究与健康促进行动、反应性或惩罚性行动相关的特征,以及与学校特征相关的特征。(2) 该研究使用了由学校校长与学生福利团队共同完成的大型全国代表性健康促进能力建设基准系统(BSHPCB)数据(n = 2057 所学校)。通过聚类分析和卡方检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验对数据进行了分析。对于事后检验,使用 Fisher 精确检验和比值比以及曼-惠特尼 U 检验。(3) 聚类分析得出了学校暴力的五种类型:“无暴力”、“青少年暴力”(学生之间和学生对工作人员的暴力,但工作人员对学生的不当行为)、“未知”(校长要么没有回应这些问题,要么不知道是否发生过任何学校暴力事件)、“同伴暴力”(学生之间发生了暴力事件,但没有学生对工作人员的暴力行为,也没有工作人员对学生的不当行为),以及“所有暴力”(所有类型的学校暴力和工作人员对学生的不当行为)。这些群体在学校类型和市政府方面存在差异。此外,健康促进行动的管理和监测与较高的学校暴力发生率有关,而其他行动,如承诺、资源、共同实践和参与与学校暴力无关。(4) 本研究的结果表明,学校在学校暴力和提供证据和指导方面存在不同的特征,以预防学校暴力。