• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有环保意识的消费者的横向差异化市场中的意识提升活动,私营与公共双头垄断。

Awareness Campaigns in a Horizontally Differentiated Market with Environmentally Conscious Consumers, Private Versus Public Duopoly.

机构信息

Departamento de Fundamentos de Análisis Económico, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos-URJC, Paseo Artilleros s/n, 28032 Madrid, Spain.

ETSI Montes, Forestal y del Medio Natural-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid-UPM, Calle José Antonio Novais 10, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 8;19(19):12891. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912891.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191912891
PMID:36232192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9566589/
Abstract

This paper examines horizontally differentiated duopolies à la Hotelling with environmentally conscious consumers and a planner promoting a sustainable good with costly awareness campaigns (ACs). The objective is to find the planner's optimal strategies and their effects on the firms' behaviour. The analysis is carried out with two approaches, considering a private and a public duopoly. In both, it is shown that the planner chooses the average characteristic supported by a higher intensity campaign. However, with the private one, such an outcome is possible if the planner has minimal resources. Consumer consciousness and ACs have opposite effects on the firms and the planner. It is proven that consumer awareness favours the interests of the duopolies and reduces those of the planner, while the contrary is true for ACs. Finally, it is shown that a public duopoly is the best scenario for sustainability. This study provides an environmental policy to replace or complement traditional instruments and a more suitable business framework to achieve efficient results.

摘要

本文考察了具有环保意识消费者的水平差异化双寡头垄断市场和一个计划者通过昂贵的意识宣传活动(ACs)推广可持续产品的情况。目的是找到计划者的最优策略及其对企业行为的影响。分析采用了两种方法,考虑了私人和公共双寡头垄断的情况。在这两种情况下,都表明计划者选择了由更高强度活动支持的平均特征。然而,在私人情况下,如果计划者的资源最少,则可以实现这种结果。消费者意识和 ACs 对企业和计划者都有相反的影响。证明消费者意识有利于双寡头垄断的利益,降低了计划者的利益,而 ACs 则相反。最后,表明公共双寡头垄断是实现可持续性的最佳方案。本研究提供了一种环境政策,以替代或补充传统工具,并提供一个更适合实现有效结果的商业框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a983/9566589/a0de4be20892/ijerph-19-12891-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a983/9566589/d6d43d28f9cd/ijerph-19-12891-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a983/9566589/a0de4be20892/ijerph-19-12891-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a983/9566589/d6d43d28f9cd/ijerph-19-12891-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a983/9566589/a0de4be20892/ijerph-19-12891-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Awareness Campaigns in a Horizontally Differentiated Market with Environmentally Conscious Consumers, Private Versus Public Duopoly.具有环保意识的消费者的横向差异化市场中的意识提升活动,私营与公共双头垄断。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 8;19(19):12891. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912891.
2
Consumers' environmental and ethical consciousness and the use of the related food products information: The role of perceived consumer effectiveness.消费者的环境和道德意识以及对相关食品产品信息的使用:感知消费者效能的作用。
Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:311-322. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.097. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Exploring the impact of sustainable marketing on consumer behavior in the sports industry.探讨可持续营销对体育行业消费者行为的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(43):97723-97733. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29215-z. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
4
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a duopoly market pricing competition and cooperation under the carbon emissions cap.减少温室气体排放:碳排放限额下的双寡头市场定价竞争与合作。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jun;26(17):16847-16854. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8767-1. Epub 2017 May 17.
5
Reference pricing and firms' pricing strategies.参考定价与企业定价策略。
J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):176-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Oct 4.
6
Quality standards versus nutritional taxes: Health and welfare impacts with strategic firms.
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:268-285. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
The effect of environmental regulation on firms' competitive performance: the case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions.环境规制对企业竞争绩效的影响:以部分欧盟地区建筑行业为例。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Sep;92(9):2136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.039. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
8
A Framework to Move Forward on the Path to Eco-innovation in the Construction Industry: Implications to Improve Firms' Sustainable Orientation.建筑业生态创新道路上前进的框架:对提升企业可持续导向的启示
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1469-84. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9620-2. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
9
The Impact of Consumer Subsidy on Green Technology Innovations for Vehicles and Environmental Impact.消费者补贴对车辆绿色技术创新和环境影响的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;17(20):7518. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207518.
10
China's Carbon Emissions and Trading Pilot, Political Connection, and Innovation Input of Publicly Listed Private Firms.中国碳排放权交易试点、政治关联与民营上市公司创新投入
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 21;17(17):6084. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176084.

本文引用的文献

1
Price Competition and Product Differentiation Based on the Subjective and Social Effect of Consumers' Environmental Awareness.基于消费者环境意识的主观和社会效应的价格竞争和产品差异化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;17(3):716. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030716.
2
Pro-environmental behavior: rational choice meets moral motivation.亲环境行为:理性选择与道德动机的契合。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jan;1185:211-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05163.x.
3
Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior: an experimental study of volunteering to be a bone marrow donor.
道德义务与自我牺牲行为的激发:一项关于自愿成为骨髓捐献者的实验研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970 Aug;15(4):283-93. doi: 10.1037/h0029614.