• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估交流板对机械通气患者皮质醇水平和生理参数的影响

Evaluating the Use of Communication Board on Cortisol Level and Physiological Parameters in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

作者信息

Divani Anahita, Manookian Arpi, Haghani Shima, Meidani Mohsen, Navidhamidi Mojdeh

机构信息

Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing and Basic Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Biostatistics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 May 23;27(3):198-203. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_82_21. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.

DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_82_21
PMID:36237952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9552588/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanically ventilated patients experience a high level of anxiety due to their therapeutic condition. Anxiety is one of the strongest emotions that patients under mechanical ventilation experience due to their inability to communicate with others. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using a communication board on these patients' by assessing serum cortisol level and vital signs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized clinical trial study was conducted in 2020. This study included 60 ventilated patients, who had been randomly assigned into two intervention and control groups. After blood sampling and evaluation of cortisol and physiological parameters, patients in the control group received routine communication by nurses, whereas those in the intervention group received communication using a communication board. Subsequently, the serum cortisol level and physiological parameters were measured again.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics. There was a significant difference in blood cortisol levels before and after in the intervention group ( = 15.52, < 0.001). After the intervention, the intervention group's systolic blood pressure ( = -3.78, < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure ( = -3.79, < 0.001), and heart rate ( = -2.09, = 0.041) were significantly lower than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication through a communication board in mechanically ventilated patients leads to decreased cortisol levels and physiological parameters. It is recommended to do more studies about communication boards' content and use this tool for more prolonged periods.

摘要

背景

机械通气患者因其治疗状况会经历高度焦虑。焦虑是机械通气患者因无法与他人交流而体验到的最强烈情绪之一。本研究的目的是通过评估血清皮质醇水平和生命体征来调查使用交流板对这些患者的影响。

材料与方法

这项随机临床试验研究于2020年进行。本研究纳入了60名机械通气患者,他们被随机分为干预组和对照组。在采集血样并评估皮质醇和生理参数后,对照组患者接受护士的常规交流,而干预组患者使用交流板进行交流。随后,再次测量血清皮质醇水平和生理参数。

结果

两组在人口统计学特征方面未观察到显著差异。干预组干预前后血皮质醇水平存在显著差异(=15.52,<0.001)。干预后,干预组的收缩压(=-3.78,<0.001)、舒张压(=-3.79,<0.001)和心率(=-2.09,=0.041)显著低于对照组。

结论

机械通气患者通过交流板进行交流可导致皮质醇水平和生理参数降低。建议对交流板的内容进行更多研究,并在更长时间内使用该工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a9/9552588/f4d391fd54ca/IJNMR-27-198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a9/9552588/f4d391fd54ca/IJNMR-27-198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a9/9552588/f4d391fd54ca/IJNMR-27-198-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Use of Communication Board on Cortisol Level and Physiological Parameters in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.评估交流板对机械通气患者皮质醇水平和生理参数的影响
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 May 23;27(3):198-203. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_82_21. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
2
The Effect of Using Communication Boards on Ease of Communication and Anxiety in Mechanically Ventilated Conscious Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units.使用交流板对入住重症监护病房的机械通气清醒患者沟通便利性及焦虑情绪的影响
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):358-362. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_68_17.
3
Music interventions for mechanically ventilated patients.用于机械通气患者的音乐干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(12):CD006902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006902.pub3. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
4
Effects of anxiety reduction training on physiological indices and serum cortisol levels before elective surgery.择期手术前焦虑缓解训练对生理指标及血清皮质醇水平的影响。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013 Sep;18(5):416-20.
5
Effect of nature-based sounds' intervention on agitation, anxiety, and stress in patients under mechanical ventilator support: a randomised controlled trial.基于自然声音干预对机械通气支持患者躁动、焦虑和应激的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Jul;50(7):895-904. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
6
Patients' reports of health care practitioner interventions that are related to communication during mechanical ventilation.患者关于医护人员在机械通气期间与沟通相关干预措施的报告。
Heart Lung. 2004 Sep-Oct;33(5):308-20. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.02.002.
7
Nurses' communication with patients who are mechanically ventilated in intensive care: the Botswana experience.护士与重症监护室中接受机械通气患者的沟通:博茨瓦纳的经验。
Int Nurs Rev. 2016 Sep;63(3):415-21. doi: 10.1111/inr.12262. Epub 2016 May 5.
8
Reflexology: its effects on physiological anxiety signs and sedation needs.反射疗法:其对生理焦虑迹象和镇静需求的影响。
Holist Nurs Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(1):6-23. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000007.
9
Communication boards in critical care: patients' views.重症监护中的交流板:患者的看法。
Appl Nurs Res. 2006 Nov;19(4):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.09.006.
10
Comparison of salivary and serum cortisol levels in mechanically ventilated patients and non-critically ill patients.机械通气患者与非危重症患者唾液和血清皮质醇水平的比较。
Acute Crit Care. 2020 Aug;35(3):149-155. doi: 10.4266/acc.2020.00297. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication with invasive mechanically ventilated patients and the use of alternative devices: integrative review.与有创机械通气患者的沟通及替代设备的使用:综合综述
J Res Nurs. 2018 Nov;23(7):614-630. doi: 10.1177/1744987118785987. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
2
A systematic review on voiceless patients' willingness to adopt high-technology augmentative and alternative communication in intensive care units.一项关于 ICU 中无声患者采用高科技辅助和替代性沟通意愿的系统评价。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021 Apr;63:102948. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102948. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
3
Nurses' perspectives about communication with patients in an intensive care setting using a communication board: A pilot study.
护士对在重症监护环境中使用交流板与患者沟通的看法:一项试点研究。
Health SA. 2019 Jul 25;24:1162. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v24i0.1162. eCollection 2019.
4
Assessment of nurse-patient communication and patient satisfaction from nursing care.护理中护患沟通及患者护理满意度的评估。
Nurs Open. 2019 Jun 26;6(3):1189-1196. doi: 10.1002/nop2.316. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
The Feasibility, Utility, and Safety of Communication Interventions With Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review.机械通气重症监护病房患者的沟通干预措施的可行性、实用性和安全性:系统评价。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1335-1355. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0001. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
The Effect of Using Communication Boards on Ease of Communication and Anxiety in Mechanically Ventilated Conscious Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units.使用交流板对入住重症监护病房的机械通气清醒患者沟通便利性及焦虑情绪的影响
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):358-362. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_68_17.
7
The effect of different types of music on patients' preoperative anxiety: A randomized controlled trial.不同类型音乐对手术患者术前焦虑的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 May;31:158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
8
The effect of provision of information on serum cortisol in patients transferred from the coronary care unit to the general ward: A randomised controlled trial.从冠心病监护病房转至普通病房的患者中提供信息对血清皮质醇的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2018 Jun;46:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
9
Osho Dynamic Meditation's Effect on Serum Cortisol Level.奥修动态静心对血清皮质醇水平的影响。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):CC05-CC08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23492.8827. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Communicating with conscious and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a systematic review.与意识清醒且接受机械通气的重症患者进行沟通:一项系统综述。
Crit Care. 2016 Oct 19;20(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1483-2.