• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于在线预立医疗照护计划门户工具的开发:ACPVoice 工具,用于社区居住伴有认知障碍的人群。

Development of an Advance Care Planning Portal-Based Tool for Community-Dwelling Persons Living With Cognitive Impairment: The ACPVoice Tool.

机构信息

Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Center for Healthcare Innovation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Aug;40(8):881-893. doi: 10.1177/10499091221134030. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1177/10499091221134030
PMID:36239407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10102257/
Abstract

Patient portals can be an innovative and efficient way to engage patients in advance care planning (ACP). However, comprehension and judgment in older adults with cognitive impairment presents several barriers and challenges to engaging in new technology. Our objective was to develop an ACP portal-based tool (ACPVoice) for community-dwelling persons living with cognitive impairment (PLCI) by engaging end-users in the design process. Two rounds of cognitive interviews were conducted to identify and resolve cognitive issues related to comprehension, judgment, response, and to assess content validity. Purposive sampling was used with the goal of enrolling 15 different participants (five with mild cognitive impairment and five dyads (those with mild dementia and their care partner) in round to assess respondents' understanding of questions related to advance care planning to be administered via the patient portal. Twenty PLCI (mean age 78.4, 10 females [50%]) and ten care partners (mean age 60.9, 9 females [90%]) completed cognitive interviews between May 2021 and October 2021. The mean Mini-Mental State Examination score for PLCI was 25.6 (SD 2.6). Unclear wording and undefined vague and/or unfamiliar terms were the major issues identified. Revisions to item wording, response options, and instructions were made to improve question comprehension and response as well as navigational ease. Minor changes to the wording, format, and response options substantially improved respondents' ability to interpret the item content of the ACPVoice tool. Dissemination and implementation of the ACPVoice tool could help to engage community-dwelling PLCI in ACP discussions.

摘要

患者门户可以成为一种创新且高效的方式,使患者参与到预先护理计划(ACP)中。然而,在认知障碍的老年患者中,理解和判断能力会给他们使用新技术带来诸多障碍和挑战。我们的目标是通过让终端用户参与设计过程,为居住在社区中患有认知障碍(PLCI)的患者开发一个基于 ACP 门户的工具(ACPVoice)。进行了两轮认知访谈,以识别和解决与理解、判断、回答相关的认知问题,并评估内容的有效性。采用了目的性抽样,目的是招募 15 名不同的参与者(5 名轻度认知障碍和 5 对(轻度痴呆症患者及其照顾者),以评估受访者对将通过患者门户管理的预先护理计划相关问题的理解。共有 20 名 PLCI(平均年龄 78.4 岁,女性 10 名[50%])和 10 名照顾者(平均年龄 60.9 岁,女性 9 名[90%])于 2021 年 5 月至 2021 年 10 月完成了认知访谈。PLCI 的平均简易精神状态检查评分是 25.6(标准差 2.6)。主要问题是表述不清楚和术语未定义,模糊且/或不熟悉。对项目表述、回答选项和说明进行了修订,以提高问题理解和回答以及导航的便利性。对措辞、格式和回答选项进行的微小更改极大地提高了受访者对 ACPVoice 工具项目内容的理解能力。ACPVoice 工具的传播和实施可以帮助居住在社区的 PLCI 参与 ACP 讨论。

相似文献

1
Development of an Advance Care Planning Portal-Based Tool for Community-Dwelling Persons Living With Cognitive Impairment: The ACPVoice Tool.基于在线预立医疗照护计划门户工具的开发:ACPVoice 工具,用于社区居住伴有认知障碍的人群。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2023 Aug;40(8):881-893. doi: 10.1177/10499091221134030. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Promoting serious illness conversations in primary care through telehealth among persons living with cognitive impairment.通过远程医疗在认知障碍患者的初级保健中促进重病对话。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3022-3034. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19100. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Making the Informal Formal: Discussing and Completing Advance Care Plans in Care Dyads with Cognitive Impairment.使非正式正式化:在认知障碍的护理二人组中讨论和完成预先护理计划。
J Palliat Care. 2022 Jul;37(3):289-297. doi: 10.1177/08258597211063047. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Should capacity assessments be performed routinely prior to discussing advance care planning with older people?是否应该在与老年人讨论预先护理计划之前,常规进行能力评估?
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Aug;30(8):1243-1250. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002836. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
5
Education and Executive Function Mediate Engagement in Advance Care Planning in Early Cognitive Impairment.教育和执行功能在认知障碍早期的预先护理计划中的作用。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Nov 1;16(11):957-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
6
Assessing Advance Care Planning Fidelity within the Context of Cognitive Impairment: The SHARE Trial.在认知障碍背景下评估预先护理计划的保真度:共享试验
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Aug;68(2):180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 15.
7
SHARING Choices: A Pilot Study to Engage Family in Advance Care Planning of Older Adults With and Without Cognitive Impairment in the Primary Care Context.分享选择:在初级保健环境中,针对有和没有认知障碍的老年患者,让家庭参与预先护理计划的一项试点研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Nov;38(11):1314-1321. doi: 10.1177/1049909120978771. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Factors associated with the intention to engage in care planning among persons with mild cognitive impairment and dementia.与轻度认知障碍和痴呆症患者参与护理计划的意愿相关的因素。
Geriatr Nurs. 2023 Mar-Apr;50:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.01.018. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
9
Telehealth Home Support During COVID-19 Confinement for Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Mild Dementia: Survey Study.COVID-19 隔离期间针对社区居住的轻度认知障碍或轻度痴呆老年人的远程医疗居家支持:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 22;22(5):e19434. doi: 10.2196/19434.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Advance Planning for Technology Use in Dementia Care: Development, Design, and Feasibility of a Novel Self-administered Decision-Making Tool.痴呆症护理中技术使用的预先规划:一种新型自我管理决策工具的开发、设计与可行性
JMIR Aging. 2022 Jul 27;5(3):e39335. doi: 10.2196/39335.
2
Mortality in the United States, 2020.2020 年美国死亡率。
NCHS Data Brief. 2021 Dec(427):1-8.
3
Goals of Care Conversations and Subsequent Advance Care Planning Outcomes for People with Dementia.目标关怀对话及其后续的痴呆症患者的预先护理计划结果。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;83(4):1767-1773. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210720.
4
Implementation of Specialist Palliative Care and Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients with Dementia.痴呆症住院患者专科姑息治疗的实施与效果
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 May;69(5):1199-1207. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17032. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Multidisciplinary Intervention vs Usual Care on Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adults in an Accountable Care Organization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.护士主导的多学科干预与常规护理对问责制医疗组织中脆弱老年人的预先护理计划的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;181(3):361-369. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5950.
6
Outcomes and interventions in the elderly with and without cognitive impairment: a longitudinal study.有认知障碍和无认知障碍老年人的结局与干预措施:一项纵向研究。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2020 Dec;14(4):394-402. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642020dn14-040010.
7
Cognitively Impaired Older Persons' and Caregivers' Perspectives on Dementia-Specific Advance Care Planning.认知障碍老年人及其照护者对痴呆症特定的预先医疗护理计划的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):932-937. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16953. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
8
Racial Differences in Dietary Relations to Cognitive Decline and Alzheimer's Disease Risk: Do We Know Enough?饮食与认知衰退及阿尔茨海默病风险的种族差异:我们了解得够多了吗?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 3;14:359. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00359. eCollection 2020.
9
Trends in Noninvasive and Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Among Medicare Beneficiaries at the End of Life.终末期 Medicare 受益人群的无创和有创机械通气趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jan 1;181(1):93-102. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5640.
10
Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review.剖析预先医疗照护计划结果的复杂性:我们了解什么,又该往何处去? 范围性回顾。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jan;69(1):234-244. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16801. Epub 2020 Sep 7.