• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physician perceptions of surveillance: Wearables, Apps, and Chatbots for COVID-19.医生对监测的看法:用于新冠肺炎的可穿戴设备、应用程序和聊天机器人
Digit Med. 2022 May 12. doi: 10.4103/digm.digm_28_21.
2
Investigating Citizens' Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Quantitative Study of the Role of Trust and Privacy.调查公民对接种追踪应用程序的接受程度:信任和隐私作用的定量研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 18;12:e48700. doi: 10.2196/48700.
3
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.德语国家对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的早期看法:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25525. doi: 10.2196/25525.
4
Modeling Trust in COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps Using the Human-Computer Trust Scale: Online Survey Study.使用人机信任量表对新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序中的信任进行建模:在线调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 13;9(2):e33951. doi: 10.2196/33951.
5
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
6
Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Insights from a global physician survey.人工智能与精神病学的未来:全球医师调查的观点。
Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jan;102:101753. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101753. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
7
Americans' perceptions of privacy and surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic.美国人对 COVID-19 大流行期间隐私和监控的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0242652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242652. eCollection 2020.
8
Prosociality and the Uptake of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Survey Analysis of Intergenerational Differences in Japan.亲社会行为与 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的采用:日本代际差异的调查分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e29923. doi: 10.2196/29923.
9
Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study.美国数字接触者追踪移动健康工具的上市后评估模型的调整和利用:观察性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 22;9:e38633. doi: 10.2196/38633.
10
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of using conversational robots (chatbots) in uro-oncology A patient and physician perspective.尿路上皮肿瘤学中使用对话机器人(聊天机器人)的意义:患者和医生的视角
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Nov;18(11):E346-E349. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8762.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician Perceptions of Catching COVID-19: Insights from a Global Survey.医生对感染新冠病毒的认知:一项全球调查的见解
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1832-1834. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06724-6. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
Time to evaluate COVID-19 contact-tracing apps.评估新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的时机到了。
Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):361-362. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01236-6.
3
Digital health during COVID-19: lessons from operationalising new models of care in ophthalmology.新冠疫情期间的数字健康:在眼科实施新型护理模式方面的经验教训。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Feb;3(2):e124-e134. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30287-9.
4
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.德语国家对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的早期看法:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25525. doi: 10.2196/25525.
5
Utilization of Self-Diagnosis Health Chatbots in Real-World Settings: Case Study.自我诊断健康聊天机器人在真实环境中的应用:案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 6;23(1):e19928. doi: 10.2196/19928.
6
Analyzing the Human Rights Impact of Increased Digital Public Health Surveillance during the COVID-19 Crisis.分析新冠疫情危机期间加强数字公共卫生监测对人权的影响。
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):7-20.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of infrared thermal imaging for detecting COVID-19 infection in minimally symptomatic patients.红外热成像技术诊断轻微症状患者 COVID-19 感染的准确性。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Mar;51(3):e13474. doi: 10.1111/eci.13474. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
8
Smartwatch data help detect COVID-19.智能手表数据有助于检测新冠病毒。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;4(12):1125-1127. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-00659-9.
9
Presence and mobility of the population during the first wave of Covid-19 outbreak and lockdown in Italy.意大利新冠疫情第一波爆发及封锁期间的人口状况与流动性
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Feb;65:102616. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102616. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
10
Pre-symptomatic detection of COVID-19 from smartwatch data.从智能手表数据中进行 COVID-19 的症状前检测。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;4(12):1208-1220. doi: 10.1038/s41551-020-00640-6. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

医生对监测的看法:用于新冠肺炎的可穿戴设备、应用程序和聊天机器人

Physician perceptions of surveillance: Wearables, Apps, and Chatbots for COVID-19.

作者信息

Linares Alexandra R, Bramstedt Katrina A, Chilukuri Mohan M, Doraiswamy P Murali

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA.

Department of Medicine, Bond University Medical Program, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Digit Med. 2022 May 12. doi: 10.4103/digm.digm_28_21.

DOI:10.4103/digm.digm_28_21
PMID:36245571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9549767/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To characterize the global physician community's opinions on the use of digital tools for COVID-19 public health surveillance and self-surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional, random, stratified survey done on Sermo, a physician networking platform, between September 9 and 15, 2020. We aimed to sample 1000 physicians divided among the USA, EU, and rest of the world. The survey questioned physicians on the risk-benefit ratio of digital tools, as well as matters of data privacy and trust.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Descriptive statistics examined physicians' characteristics and opinions by age group, gender, frontline status, and geographic region. ANOVA, t-test, and Chi-square tests with P < 0.05 were viewed as qualitatively different. As this was an exploratory study, we did not adjust for small cell sizes or multiplicity. We used JMP Pro 15 (SAS), as well as Protobi.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 1004 physicians with a mean (standard deviation) age of 49.14 (12) years. Enthusiasm was highest for self-monitoring smartwatches (66%) and contact tracing apps (66%) and slightly lower (48-56%) for other tools. Trust was highest for health providers (68%) and lowest for technology companies (30%). Most respondents (69.8%) felt that loosening privacy standards to fight the pandemic would lead to misuse of privacy in the future.

CONCLUSION

The survey provides foundational insights into how physicians think of surveillance.

摘要

背景与目的

描述全球医生群体对于使用数字工具进行新冠疫情公共卫生监测和自我监测的看法。

材料与方法

于2020年9月9日至15日在医生社交平台Sermo上进行了横断面随机分层调查。我们的目标是抽取1000名医生作为样本,他们分布在美国、欧盟和世界其他地区。该调查询问了医生关于数字工具的风险效益比以及数据隐私和信任问题。

使用的统计分析方法

描述性统计按年龄组、性别、一线工作状态和地理区域对医生的特征和看法进行了分析。方差分析、t检验和P<0.05的卡方检验被视为存在质的差异。由于这是一项探索性研究,我们未对小样本量或多重性进行调整。我们使用了JMP Pro 15(SAS)以及Protobi。

结果

1004名医生完成了调查,他们的平均(标准差)年龄为49.14(12)岁。对自我监测智能手表(66%)和接触者追踪应用程序(66%)的热情最高,对其他工具的热情略低(48%-56%)。对医疗服务提供者的信任度最高(68%),对科技公司的信任度最低(30%)。大多数受访者(69.8%)认为,为抗击疫情而放宽隐私标准会导致未来隐私被滥用。

结论

该调查为医生如何看待监测提供了基础性见解。