Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e29923. doi: 10.2196/29923.
To control the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to trace and contain infection chains; for this reason, policymakers have endorsed the usage of contact tracing apps. To date, over 50 countries have released such apps officially or semiofficially, but those that rely on citizens' voluntary uptake suffer from low adoption rates, reducing their effectiveness. Early studies suggest that the low uptake is driven by citizens' concerns about security and privacy, as well as low perceptions of infection risk and benefits from the usage. However, these do not explore important generational differences in uptake decision or the association between individuals' prosociality and uptake.
The objective of our study was to examine the role of individuals' prosociality and other factors discussed in the literature, such as perceived risk and trust in government, in encouraging the usage of contact tracing apps in Japan. We paid particular attention to generational differences.
A web-based survey was conducted in Japan 6 months after the release of a government-sponsored contact tracing app. Participants were recruited from individuals aged between 20 and 69 years. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to measure prosociality, risk perception, and trust in government. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between these factors and uptake.
There was a total of 7084 respondents, and observations from 5402 respondents were used for analysis, of which 791 respondents (14.6%) had ever used the app. Two factors of prosociality were retained: agreeableness and attachment to the community. Full-sample analysis demonstrated app uptake was determined by agreeableness, attachment to the community, concern about health risks, concern about social risks, and trust in the national government; however, important differences existed. The uptake decision of respondents aged between 20 and 39 years was attributed to their attachment to the community (odds ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.48). Agreeable personality (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.35), concern about social risk (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.35), and trust in national government (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28) were key determinants for those aged between 40 and 59 years. For those aged over 60 years, concerns about health risks determined the uptake decision (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.80).
Policymakers should implement different interventions for each generation to increase the adoption rate of contact tracing apps. It may be effective to inform older adults about the health benefits of the apps. For middle-age adults, it is important to mitigate concerns about security and privacy issues, and for younger generations, it is necessary to boost their attachment to their community by utilizing social media and other web-based network tools.
为控制 COVID-19 疫情,追踪和控制感染链至关重要;因此,政策制定者支持使用接触者追踪应用程序。迄今为止,已有 50 多个国家正式或半正式发布了此类应用程序,但那些依赖公民自愿采用的应用程序采用率较低,降低了其效果。早期研究表明,采用率低是由于公民对安全和隐私的担忧,以及对感染风险和使用益处的认知较低所致。然而,这些研究并未探讨采用决策中的重要代际差异,也未探讨个体亲社会行为与采用之间的关系。
本研究旨在探讨个体亲社会行为以及文献中讨论的其他因素(如感知风险和对政府的信任)在鼓励日本使用接触者追踪应用程序方面的作用。我们特别关注代际差异。
在政府赞助的接触者追踪应用程序发布 6 个月后,在日本进行了一项基于网络的调查。参与者是年龄在 20 至 69 岁之间的个人。进行探索性因素分析以衡量亲社会行为、风险感知和对政府的信任。使用逻辑回归来检验这些因素与采用之间的关联。
共有 7084 名受访者,其中 5402 名受访者的观察结果用于分析,其中 791 名受访者(14.6%)曾使用过该应用程序。保留了亲社会行为的两个因素:宜人性和对社区的依恋。全样本分析表明,应用程序的采用取决于宜人性、对社区的依恋、对健康风险的关注、对社会风险的关注以及对国家政府的信任;然而,存在重要差异。20 至 39 岁受访者的采用决定归因于他们对社区的依恋(比值比 [OR] 1.28,95%CI 1.11-1.48)。宜人性(OR 1.18,95%CI 1.02-1.35)、对社会风险的关注(OR 1.17,95%CI 1.02-1.35)和对国家政府的信任(OR 1.16,95%CI 1.05-1.28)是 40 至 59 岁人群的关键决定因素。对于 60 岁以上的人,健康风险的关注决定了采用决定(OR 1.49,95%CI 1.24-1.80)。
政策制定者应为每一代人实施不同的干预措施,以提高接触者追踪应用程序的采用率。告知老年人应用程序的健康益处可能会很有效。对于中年成年人,重要的是要减轻他们对安全和隐私问题的担忧,对于年轻一代,有必要通过利用社交媒体和其他基于网络的网络工具来增强他们对社区的依恋。