Ju Wonwoo, Doran Dominic, Hawkins Richard, Gómez-Díaz Antonio, Martin-Garcia Andres, Ade Jack D, Laws Andy, Evans Mark, Bradley Paul S
The Research Institution for Sport and Exercise Sciences at Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, England, UK.
Football Medicine and Science Department at Manchester United Football Club, Manchester, UK.
Biol Sport. 2022 Oct;39(4):973-983. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.112083. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
The present study aimed to determine the physical-tactical trends of elite players/teams during peak 1-, 3- and 5-min periods of match-play. A total of 50 English Premier League matches (n = 583 player observations) were analysed by coding the players' physical-tactical activities through the synchronisation of tracking data and video. The contextualised data showed that during the peak periods (i.e., the most demanding passage of play), players/teams covered the largest distances for 'Recovery Run' (28-37%) out of possession and 'Support Play' (9-13%) in possession. In the following periods, players covered less high-intensity distance versus the average with a more pronounced decline in the next 1-min period than longer duration 3- and 5-min periods (48% vs ~25-30%, ES: 0.4-0.5, < 0.01); team data showed similar trends with different relative patterns (31% vs 17-30%, ES: 0.5-0.8, < 0.01). After peak periods, players/teams performed 20-53% less high-intensity distances for 'Covering' and 'Recovery Run' (ES: 0.2-0.7, < 0.01) out of possession. However, players covered 28-91% less distance for 'Run with Ball' (ES: 0.1-0.5, < 0.05) when in possession. Some physical-tactical actions exhibited inconsistency in different time durations of the next periods; however, these physical-tactical data were position-specific. This may signify that each position has certain physical-tactical actions to execute even after the peak periods, especially when they are tactically required to do so. As the data demonstrates unique physical-tactical trends of players/teams during the peak and next periods of play, this could help practitioners prescribe position- and player-specific drills, and better understand transient decrements in high-intensity running after intense passages of play.
本研究旨在确定精英球员/球队在比赛中1分钟、3分钟和5分钟的高峰期内的身体战术趋势。通过将跟踪数据与视频同步，对球员的身体战术活动进行编码，共分析了50场英超联赛比赛（n = 583名球员观察数据）。情境化数据显示，在高峰期（即比赛中要求最高的阶段），球员/球队在无球状态下进行“恢复跑”的距离最长（28%-37%），在有球状态下进行“支援配合”的距离最长（9%-13%）。在接下来的时间段内，球员进行的高强度距离比平均水平少，且在下一个1分钟时间段内的下降比3分钟和5分钟的较长时间段更明显（48%对约25%-30%，效应量：0.4-0.5，P < 0.01）；球队数据显示出类似趋势，但相对模式不同（31%对17%-30%，效应量：0.5-0.8，P < 0.01）。在高峰期之后，球员/球队在无球状态下进行“防守覆盖”和“恢复跑”的高强度距离减少了20%-53%（效应量：0.2-0.7，P < 0.01）。然而，球员在有球状态下进行“带球跑”的距离减少了28%-91%（效应量：0.1-0.5，P < 0.05）。一些身体战术动作在接下来时间段的不同时长内表现出不一致性；然而，这些身体战术数据是特定位置的。这可能意味着即使在高峰期之后，每个位置都有特定的身体战术动作要执行，特别是在战术上有要求时。由于数据展示了球员/球队在比赛高峰期及之后时间段独特的身体战术趋势，这有助于从业者制定针对特定位置和球员的训练方法，并更好地理解激烈比赛阶段后高强度奔跑的短暂下降情况。
