• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交互动可能会选择降低能力。

Social interaction can select for reduced ability.

机构信息

School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Fry Building, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK.

Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, Berlin 12587, Germany.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Oct 26;289(1985):20221788. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1788. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2022.1788
PMID:36259207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9579777/
Abstract

Animals, including humans, differ in a wide range of physical and cognitive abilities ranging from measures of running speed and physical strength to learning ability and intelligence. We consider the evolution of ability when individuals interact pairwise over their contribution to a common good. In this interaction, the contribution of each is assumed to be the best given their own ability and the contribution of their partner. Since there is a tendency for individuals to partially compensate for a low contribution by their partner, low-ability individuals can do well. As a consequence, for benefit and cost structures for which individuals have a strong response to partner's contribution, there can be selection for reduced ability. Furthermore, there can be disruptive selection on ability, leading to a bimodal distribution of ability under some modes of inheritance.

摘要

动物(包括人类)在身体和认知能力方面存在广泛差异,这些差异的衡量标准包括奔跑速度和体力、学习能力和智力等。当个体在共同利益方面进行两两相互作用时,我们会考虑能力的进化。在这种相互作用中,每个人的贡献被认为是基于他们自己的能力和他们的合作伙伴的贡献。由于个体倾向于部分弥补合作伙伴的低贡献,因此低能力的个体也可以表现良好。因此,对于个体对合作伙伴贡献有强烈反应的利益和成本结构,能力的降低可能会受到选择。此外,能力可能会受到破坏性选择,从而导致在某些遗传模式下能力呈双峰分布。

相似文献

1
Social interaction can select for reduced ability.社交互动可能会选择降低能力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Oct 26;289(1985):20221788. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1788. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
2
Directional learning and the provisioning of public goods.定向学习与公共物品的供应
Sci Rep. 2015 Jan 26;5:8010. doi: 10.1038/srep08010.
3
Evolution of trust and trustworthiness: social awareness favours personality differences.信任与可信赖性的演变:社会意识有利于个性差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 22;276(1657):605-13. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1182.
4
Strategy selection in evolutionary game dynamics on group interaction networks.群体交互网络上进化博弈动力学中的策略选择
Bull Math Biol. 2014 Nov;76(11):2785-805. doi: 10.1007/s11538-014-0031-y. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
5
Stags, Hawks, and Doves: Social Evolution Theory and Individual Variation in Cooperation.雄鹿、鹰派与鸽派:社会进化理论与合作中的个体差异
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Sep 1;57(3):566-579. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx071.
6
Feature selection with neighborhood entropy-based cooperative game theory.基于邻域熵的合作博弈理论的特征选择
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2014;2014:479289. doi: 10.1155/2014/479289. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
7
Review: Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment.综述:无分类一次性社会困境中的公共物品博弈论
J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
8
Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games.社会多样性促进了公共物品博弈中合作的出现。
Nature. 2008 Jul 10;454(7201):213-6. doi: 10.1038/nature06940.
9
Learning leads to bounded rationality and the evolution of cognitive bias in public goods games.学习导致有限理性和公共物品博弈中认知偏差的演变。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 8;9(1):16319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52781-7.
10
Evolutionary stability in the asymmetric volunteer's dilemma.非对称志愿者困境中的进化稳定性
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 11;9(8):e103931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103931. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Flexible females: nutritional state influences biparental cooperation in a burying beetle.灵活的雌性:营养状况影响埋葬虫的双亲合作。
Behav Ecol. 2024 Feb 24;35(2):arae009. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arae009. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning leads to bounded rationality and the evolution of cognitive bias in public goods games.学习导致有限理性和公共物品博弈中认知偏差的演变。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 8;9(1):16319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52781-7.
2
Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition.测量和理解认知的个体差异。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0280.
3
The infinitesimal model: Definition, derivation, and implications.无穷小模型:定义、推导及影响
Theor Popul Biol. 2017 Dec;118:50-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field.认知与人格:新兴领域的分析。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Apr;30(4):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
5
Sexual conflict over parental care promotes the evolution of sex differences in care and the ability to care.亲代抚育方面的性别冲突推动了抚育行为及抚育能力上的性别差异进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 22;282(1803):20142752. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2752.
6
Reputation can enhance or suppress cooperation through positive feedback.声誉可以通过正反馈增强或抑制合作。
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 20;6:6134. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7134.
7
Towards a richer evolutionary game theory.走向更丰富的进化博弈论。
J R Soc Interface. 2013 Aug 21;10(88):20130544. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0544. Print 2013 Nov 6.
8
On the evolution of personalities via frequency-dependent selection.基于频率相关选择的人格进化。
Am Nat. 2012 Jun;179(6):679-92. doi: 10.1086/665656. Epub 2012 May 3.
9
The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition.人类行为和认知个体间差异的结构基础。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Apr;12(4):231-42. doi: 10.1038/nrn3000. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
10
Individual differences in cognitive abilities.认知能力的个体差异。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1979 Feb;30:603-40. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.003131.