Pharmaceutical Engineering and 3D Printing (PharmE3D) Lab, Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Int J Pharm. 2022 Nov 25;628:122302. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122302. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Current microparticle (MP) development still strongly relies on the laborious trial-and-error approach. Herein, we developed a systemic method to evaluate the significance of MP formulation factors and predict drug loading efficiency (DLE) using design of experiment (DoE) and machine learning modeling. A first-in-class 3D printing concept was initially employed to fabricate polymeric MPs by a 3D printer. Sprayed Multi Adsorbed-droplet Reposing Technology (SMART) was developed to combine extrusion-based printing with emulsion evaporation technique to fabricate a small molecule drug i.e., 6-thioguanine (6-TG) loaded poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) MPs. Compared to conventional emulsion evaporation method, SMART employs the shear force exerted by the printing nozzle rather than the sonication energy to generate smaller emulsion droplets in a single step. Furthermore, the applied shear force in the 3D printing process reported herein is controllable since the emulsion is extruded through the nozzle under preset printing conditions. The formulated MPs exhibited spherical structure with size distribution ∼ 1-3μ m in diameter and reached ∼ 100 % drug release at 10 h. Also, the papain-like protease (PLpro) inhibition efficacy of 6-TG in formulated MPs was maintained even after the printing process under different printing conditions. Furthermore, the formulation factor importance was assessed by DoE statistical analysis and further validated by machine learning modeling. Among the four process parameters (drug amount, printing speed, printing pressure, and nozzle size), drug amount was the most influential formulation factor. Moreover, it is interesting that nearly all the machine learning models, especially decision tree (DT), demonstrated superior performance in predicting DLE compared to DoE regression models. Overall, incorporating DoE and machine learning modeling shows great promises in the prediction and optimization of MP formulations factors by means of a novel SMART technology. Moreover, this systemic approach helps streamline the development of MP with programmable pharmaceutical attributes, representing a new paradigm for digital pharmaceutical science.
当前的微粒(MP)开发仍然强烈依赖于艰苦的反复试验方法。在这里,我们开发了一种系统的方法,通过实验设计(DoE)和机器学习建模来评估 MP 配方因素的重要性并预测药物载药量(DLE)。最初采用 3D 打印的首创概念,通过 3D 打印机制造聚合物 MPs。开发了喷涂多吸附液滴再沉淀技术(SMART),将基于挤出的打印与乳液蒸发技术相结合,制造小分子药物,即 6-硫代鸟嘌呤(6-TG)负载的聚(乳酸-共-乙醇酸)(PLGA) MPs。与传统的乳液蒸发方法相比,SMART 在单个步骤中使用由打印喷嘴施加的剪切力而不是超声能量来生成更小的乳液液滴。此外,本文报道的 3D 打印过程中施加的剪切力是可控的,因为乳液在预设的打印条件下通过喷嘴挤出。所配制的 MPs 表现出直径约为 1-3μm 的球形结构和尺寸分布,并在 10 小时内达到约 100%的药物释放。此外,即使在不同的打印条件下进行打印后,6-TG 在配制的 MPs 中的木瓜样蛋白酶(PLpro)抑制效果仍得以维持。此外,通过 DoE 统计分析评估了配方因素的重要性,并通过机器学习建模进一步验证。在四个工艺参数(药物剂量、打印速度、打印压力和喷嘴尺寸)中,药物剂量是最具影响力的配方因素。此外,有趣的是,几乎所有的机器学习模型,尤其是决策树(DT),在预测 DLE 方面的表现都优于 DoE 回归模型。总体而言,通过结合 DoE 和机器学习建模,通过新颖的 SMART 技术,有望在预测和优化 MP 配方因素方面取得进展。此外,这种系统方法有助于简化具有可编程药物属性的 MP 的开发,代表了数字药物科学的新模式。