Wang Junfang, Liu Yusi, Fu Guochen, Chen Yifan, Wu Lei, Pan Mingliang, Yang Yuli, Chen Zhuo, Cao Yu, Li Yong, Wang Hao, Wang Bixiang, Du Ruyi, Xiong Yanting, Liu Wei, Xu Nuo, Xia Xiaobao, Li Qianqian, Lv Chengcheng, Ruan Fang
Department of Preventive Medicine, Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, China.
National Demonstration Center for Experimental General Medicine Education of Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 6;13:842397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842397. eCollection 2022.
The lack of a standardized reliable and valid instrument makes it difficult to measure attitudes toward lesbian women and gay men (ATLG) consistently and thus poses a challenge to compare and contrast intervention measures. This study aimed to validate Herek's ATLG scale among undergraduates in mainland China and identify factors associated with negative attitudes toward LG. A total of 6,036 eligible undergraduates conveniently drawn from 30 provinces across mainland China were randomly split in half. Item analysis was first used to select unrelated or redundant items for deletion. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were then conducted on the first half of the sample ( = 3,001), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analysis in the second half ( = 3035). Logistic regression analyses were finally carried out to identify their determinants. Six items were removed from the item analysis. EFA supported the existence of two factors (ATL and ATG). CFA results indicated that the two-factor model fit the data better than the one-factor model. Logistic regression analyses indicated that being female, majoring in non-health-related disciplines, attributing homosexuality to uncontrollable causes, non-adherence to traditional gender norms and exposure to homosexual content were significantly associated with less negative attitudes toward both L and G. Urban students were marginally less likely to express negative attitudes toward L but not G, while non-heterosexuals and those who had prior personal contact with homosexuals exhibited less negative attitudes toward G but not L. However, grade showed no significant associations with either ATL or ATG. The retained 14-item version of Herek's ATLG scale has been proven to be a reliable and valid tool. Furthermore, ATL and ATG were determined by different factors and thus would be treated separately. In order to reduce negative attitudes toward LG among undergraduates in mainland China, a comprehensive intervention plan such as conducting comprehensive sex education and pushing the process of legalizing same-sex marriage should be designed, implemented and evaluated.
缺乏标准化、可靠且有效的工具使得难以持续测量对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的态度(ATLG),因此在比较和对比干预措施方面构成了挑战。本研究旨在验证赫雷克的ATLG量表在中国大陆大学生中的有效性,并确定与对LGBT群体负面态度相关的因素。从中国大陆30个省份方便抽取的6036名符合条件的大学生被随机分成两半。首先进行项目分析以选择无关或冗余的项目进行删除。然后对样本的前半部分(n = 3001)进行探索性因素分析(EFA),随后在后半部分(n = 3035)进行验证性因素分析(CFA)和信度分析。最后进行逻辑回归分析以确定其决定因素。项目分析中删除了6个项目。EFA支持存在两个因素(对女同性恋者的态度和对男同性恋者的态度)。CFA结果表明,两因素模型比单因素模型更适合数据。逻辑回归分析表明,女性、非健康相关专业、将同性恋归因于不可控原因、不遵守传统性别规范以及接触同性恋内容与对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的负面态度较少显著相关。城市学生对女同性恋者表达负面态度的可能性略低,但对男同性恋者并非如此,而非异性恋者和那些曾与同性恋者有过个人接触的人对男同性恋者的负面态度较少,但对女同性恋者并非如此。然而,年级与对女同性恋者的态度或对男同性恋者的态度均无显著关联。保留的14项版本的赫雷克ATLG量表已被证明是一个可靠且有效的工具。此外,对女同性恋者的态度和对男同性恋者的态度由不同因素决定,因此应分别对待。为了减少中国大陆大学生对LGBT群体的负面态度,应设计、实施和评估一项全面的干预计划,例如开展全面性教育和推动同性婚姻合法化进程。