Minuti Tommaso, Cigni Paolo, Costagli Michele, Cucini Alessandro, Cione Erika, Melotto Samuele, Rapetti Stefano, Ricotti Leonardo, Cannataro Roberto
The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Department of Excellence in Robotics & AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2023 Feb 6;13(2):458. doi: 10.3390/life13020458.
Assessing lower limb strength in the field is problematic, as the "gold standard assessment" with isokinetic strength is cumbersome, and the device is costly and not transportable and keeps the angle of the hip at around 90°. : We evaluated isometric muscle strength in a standing position with the help of an exoskeleton that holds the subject and makes the test easily repeatable. The optimal device angles for hip and knee were, respectively, 20° and 80° for flexor tests and 30° and 40° for extensor tests. Test-retest reliability was very high for the right knee extensor (ICC 0.96-0.98), left knee extensor (ICC 0.96-0.97), right knee flexor (ICC 0.91-0.96), and left knee flexor (ICC 0.96-0.97). Furthermore, the typical error in percent (T.E.%) ranged from 2.50 to 5.50%, and the change in the mean in percent ranged from 0.84 to 7.72%, making it possible to determine even a slight variation in force. this new method could represent a valid alternative for assessing strength, due to the high reliability and the favorable joint position, particularly in football.
在野外评估下肢力量存在问题,因为等速肌力测试这一“金标准评估”方法操作繁琐,且设备昂贵、不可移动,还会使髋关节角度保持在90°左右。我们借助一种外骨骼评估站立位的等长肌力,该外骨骼可支撑受试者并使测试易于重复进行。髋关节和膝关节的最佳测试角度分别为:屈肌测试时为20°和80°,伸肌测试时为30°和40°。右膝伸肌(组内相关系数ICC为0.96 - 0.98)、左膝伸肌(ICC为0.96 - 0.97)、右膝屈肌(ICC为0.91 - 0.96)和左膝屈肌(ICC为0.96 - 0.97)的重测信度非常高。此外,百分比典型误差(T.E.%)在2.50%至5.50%之间,平均百分比变化在0.84%至7.72%之间,这使得即使是轻微的力量变化也能够被检测出来。由于具有高可靠性和良好的关节位置,这种新方法可能是评估力量的一种有效替代方法,尤其在足球运动中。