Suppr超能文献

临床实验室中丝状真菌鉴定的布鲁克生物梅里埃、ASTA MicroIDSys 和 VITEK-MS 性能评估及三种提取方法

Performance Evaluation of Bruker Biotyper, ASTA MicroIDSys, and VITEK-MS and Three Extraction Methods for Filamentous Fungal Identification in Clinical Laboratories.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chung-Ang Universitygrid.254224.7 College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Centergrid.411653.4, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Nov 16;60(11):e0081222. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00812-22. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

Abstract

Filamentous fungi are a major cause of life-threatening infections in immunocompromised patients; thus, rapid and accurate identification is critical. Filamentous fungal identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been demonstrated with high sensitivity and reproducibility; however, its wider application has been limited in clinical laboratories because of practical challenges such as database availability or lack of standardization. In this study, we compared the performance of the Bruker Biotyper, ASTA MicroIDSys, and Vitek MS for 84 clinical filamentous fungal isolates. Moreover, the sensitivity of three independent sample preparation methods (direct, on plate, in tube) was compared. Bruker Biotyper identified 71.43% (60/84) of isolates correctly (species, genus, or complex/group level). ASTA MicroIDSys and Vitek MS showed accuracy rates of 70.24% (59/84) and 55.95% (47/84), respectively. We found that any difference in sensitivity may be attributed to the database of the systems. In addition, the "in tube" method showed the highest sensitivity among the three methods; however, there was no statistical difference among them. For the broader application of MALDI-TOF MS for filamentous fungal identification, further studies from multiple perspectives are required.

摘要

丝状真菌是免疫功能低下患者发生危及生命感染的主要原因,因此快速准确的鉴定至关重要。基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)对丝状真菌的鉴定具有较高的灵敏度和重现性;然而,由于数据库可用性或缺乏标准化等实际挑战,其在临床实验室中的广泛应用受到限制。在这项研究中,我们比较了 Bruker Biotyper、ASTA MicroIDSys 和 Vitek MS 对 84 株临床丝状真菌分离株的性能。此外,还比较了三种独立的样品制备方法(直接法、平板法和管内法)的灵敏度。Bruker Biotyper 正确鉴定了 71.43%(60/84)的分离株(种、属或复合物/组水平)。ASTA MicroIDSys 和 Vitek MS 的准确率分别为 70.24%(59/84)和 55.95%(47/84)。我们发现,任何灵敏度差异都可能归因于系统的数据库。此外,三种方法中,“管内法”显示出最高的灵敏度;然而,它们之间没有统计学差异。为了更广泛地将 MALDI-TOF MS 应用于丝状真菌鉴定,需要从多个角度进行进一步研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Overview of invasive fungal infections.侵袭性真菌感染概述。
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;968:1-23. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-257-5_1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验