Yildiz Bora, Yildiz Tayfun, Ozbilgin Mustafa, Yildiz Harun
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Brunel Business School, Organisations and People, College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 10;13:962830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962830. eCollection 2022.
Studies conducted in the health sector have determined a positive relationship between job satisfaction and work engagement. However, this paper reveals that this relationship turns into a negative or non-significant relationship during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explore the reasons for inconsistency in research findings in this critical period through a meta-analysis.
This study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and PICO framework. Online databases including Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, Google Scholar, and additional records from other databases were searched without any time limitation, and all studies published in English that reported the correlation between work engagement and job satisfaction were included in the analysis. In total, 36 individual correlation coefficients were synthesized. R statistical language was used to analyze the data.
A total of 36 studies with a sample size of 16,087 were synthesized. The overall effect size was found as = 0.57 (95% CI [0.50-0.64]). While the moderating effect of national culture was not statistically significant, presence of COVID-19 as the significant moderator explained 37.08% of effect size heterogeneity. Such that the presence of COVID-19 has transformed the positive relationship between work engagement and job satisfaction into a negative but statistically non-significant relationship.
This study empirically challenges the existing assumptions about the positive link between work engagement and job satisfaction. The results of the research can be a guide for managers and policymakers. Specifically, based on these results, different mechanisms can be put in place to support work engagement and, in turn, job satisfaction in the COVID-19 process.
卫生部门开展的研究已确定工作满意度与工作投入之间存在正相关关系。然而,本文揭示在新冠疫情期间这种关系转变为负相关或无显著关系。我们通过荟萃分析探究这一关键时期研究结果不一致的原因。
本研究按照PRISMA指南和PICO框架进行。对包括科学网、Scopus、PubMed、ProQuest、谷歌学术在内的在线数据库以及其他数据库的额外记录进行无时间限制的检索,纳入所有报告工作投入与工作满意度相关性的英文发表研究。总共综合了36个个体相关系数。使用R统计语言分析数据。
总共综合了36项研究,样本量为16,087。总体效应量为 = 0.57(95%置信区间[0.50 - 0.64])。虽然国家文化的调节效应无统计学意义,但新冠疫情作为显著调节因素解释了37.08%的效应量异质性。也就是说,新冠疫情的存在已将工作投入与工作满意度之间的正相关关系转变为负相关但无统计学意义的关系。
本研究从实证角度对关于工作投入与工作满意度之间正相关的现有假设提出了挑战。研究结果可为管理者和政策制定者提供指导。具体而言,基于这些结果,可以采取不同机制来支持工作投入,进而在新冠疫情期间提升工作满意度。