Menéndez Granda Marta, Iannotti Giannina Rita, Darqué Alexandra, Ptak Radek
Laboratory of Cognitive Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Swiss Foundation for Innovation and Training in Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Oct 11;16:983137. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.983137. eCollection 2022.
Several arguments suggest that motor planning may share embodied neural mechanisms with mental rotation (MR). However, it is not well established whether this overlap occurs regardless of the type of stimulus that is manipulated, in particular manipulable or non-manipulable objects and body parts. We here used high-density electroencephalography (EEG) to examine the cognitive similarity between MR of objects that do not afford specific hand actions (chairs) and bodily stimuli (hands). Participants had identical response options for both types of stimuli, and they gave responses orally in order to prevent possible interference with motor imagery. MR of hands and chairs generated very similar behavioral responses, time-courses and neural sources of evoked-response potentials (ERPs). ERP segmentation analysis revealed distinct time windows during which differential effects of stimulus type and angular disparity were observed. An early period (90-160 ms) differentiated only between stimulus types, and was associated with occipito-temporal activity. A later period (290-330 ms) revealed strong effects of angular disparity, associated with electrical sources in the right angular gyrus and primary motor/somatosensory cortex. These data suggest that spatial transformation processes and motor planning are recruited simultaneously, supporting the involvement of motor emulation processes in MR.
有几个论据表明,运动规划可能与心理旋转(MR)共享具身神经机制。然而,无论被操作的刺激类型如何,尤其是可操作或不可操作的物体及身体部位,这种重叠是否发生尚未得到充分证实。我们在此使用高密度脑电图(EEG)来研究无法提供特定手部动作的物体(椅子)的MR与身体刺激(手)之间的认知相似性。参与者对两种类型的刺激有相同的反应选项,并且他们通过口头给出反应,以防止对运动想象可能产生的干扰。手部和椅子的MR产生了非常相似的行为反应、时间进程和诱发反应电位(ERP)的神经源。ERP分段分析揭示了不同的时间窗口,在此期间观察到了刺激类型和角度差异的不同影响。早期(90 - 160毫秒)仅区分刺激类型,并与枕颞叶活动相关。后期(290 - 330毫秒)显示出角度差异的强烈影响,与右侧角回和初级运动/体感皮层中的电源相关。这些数据表明,空间转换过程和运动规划是同时被招募的,支持了运动模拟过程参与MR的观点。