• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用设计思维设计一个促进团队合作与协作实践的对话代理:关于用户体验的探索性研究

Designing a conversational agent to promote teamwork and collaborative practices using design thinking: An explorative study on user experiences.

作者信息

Skov Sofie Smedegaard, Andersen Josefine Ranfelt, Lauridsen Sigurd, Bab Mads, Bundsbæk Marianne, Nielsen Maj Britt Dahl

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Gnist, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:903715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903715. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903715
PMID:36304869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9593076/
Abstract

Appearance, voice features, and communication style affect users trust in conversational agents (chatbots), but few studies have assessed what features users like and dislike. Using design thinking, we developed Susa, a conversational agent, to help workplaces promote teamwork and collaborative practices. Design thinking prioritizes co-creation and multidisciplinary teamwork to develop innovative solutions to complex problems. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore users' interactions with and reactions toward Susa and explain how we used user inputs to adapt and refine the first prototype. The employees and managers from four workplaces participated in three workshops to test and refine the agent. We applied an explorative thematic analysis of data collected video recordings of the workshops. The results of the analyses revealed that visual identity, communication style and personality was important for acceptability. Users favored a more human like agent that primarily communicated with the team text messages. Users disliked emoticons and humor because these features clashed with the seriousness of the topic. Finally, users highlighted that Susa helped structure organizational change processes, develop concrete action plans, and stay on track. It is a weakness that Susa is a simple robot based on a preprogrammed script that does not allow users to adapt the process.

摘要

外观、语音特征和沟通方式会影响用户对对话代理(聊天机器人)的信任,但很少有研究评估用户喜欢和不喜欢哪些特征。我们运用设计思维开发了对话代理Susa,以帮助工作场所促进团队合作和协作实践。设计思维将共同创造和多学科团队合作置于优先地位,以开发复杂问题的创新解决方案。这项定性研究的目的是探索用户与Susa的互动及反应,并解释我们如何利用用户反馈来调整和完善第一个原型。来自四个工作场所的员工和经理参加了三个研讨会,以测试和完善该代理。我们对研讨会上收集的视频记录数据进行了探索性主题分析。分析结果表明,视觉形象、沟通方式和个性对可接受性很重要。用户更喜欢一个更像人类的代理,它主要通过短信与团队沟通。用户不喜欢表情符号和幽默,因为这些特征与主题的严肃性相冲突。最后,用户强调Susa有助于构建组织变革过程、制定具体行动计划并保持正轨。Susa是一个基于预编程脚本的简单机器人,不允许用户调整流程,这是一个缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/638d/9593076/3a6d5c84e3a9/fpsyg-13-903715-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/638d/9593076/33febe340db6/fpsyg-13-903715-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/638d/9593076/3a6d5c84e3a9/fpsyg-13-903715-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/638d/9593076/33febe340db6/fpsyg-13-903715-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/638d/9593076/3a6d5c84e3a9/fpsyg-13-903715-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Designing a conversational agent to promote teamwork and collaborative practices using design thinking: An explorative study on user experiences.运用设计思维设计一个促进团队合作与协作实践的对话代理:关于用户体验的探索性研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:903715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903715. eCollection 2022.
2
Co-Designing a Web-Based Decision Aid Tool for Employees Disclosure of Mental Health Conditions: A Participatory Study Design Using Employee and Organizational Preferences.共同设计一款用于员工心理健康状况披露的网络决策辅助工具:一项采用员工和组织偏好的参与式研究设计
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Nov 6;4(11):e23337. doi: 10.2196/23337.
3
Assistive Conversational Agent for Health Coaching: A Validation Study.用于健康指导的辅助对话代理:一项验证研究。
Methods Inf Med. 2019 Jun;58(1):9-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688757. Epub 2019 May 22.
4
Using Participatory Design Methodologies to Co-Design and Culturally Adapt the Spanish Version of the Mental Health eClinic: Qualitative Study.运用参与式设计方法共同设计心理健康电子诊所的西班牙语版本并进行文化调适:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 2;21(8):e14127. doi: 10.2196/14127.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
'Light up for all' - Building Knowledge on Universal Design Through Direct User Contact in Design Workshops.“为所有人点亮”——通过设计工作坊中的直接用户接触来建立通用设计知识。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Jun 4;282:102-119. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210388.
7
The influence of conversational agents' role and communication style on user experience.对话代理的角色和沟通方式对用户体验的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 1;14:1266186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1266186. eCollection 2023.
8
What's Up With These Conversational Health Agents? From Users' Critiques to Implications for Design.这些对话式健康助手怎么了?从用户批评到设计启示
Front Digit Health. 2022 Apr 7;4:840232. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.840232. eCollection 2022.
9
Shifting Practices Toward Recovery-Oriented Care Through an E-Recovery Portal in Community Mental Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study.通过社区精神卫生保健中的电子康复门户将实践转向以康复为导向的护理:一项混合方法探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 2;19(5):e145. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7524.
10
Creating Gameful Design in mHealth: A Participatory Co-Design Approach.在移动健康领域创建游戏化设计:一种参与式协同设计方法。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 14;6(12):e11579. doi: 10.2196/11579.

本文引用的文献

1
Chatbot-Based Assessment of Employees' Mental Health: Design Process and Pilot Implementation.基于聊天机器人的员工心理健康评估:设计过程与试点实施
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Apr 21;5(4):e21678. doi: 10.2196/21678.
2
A Digital Tool to Build the Capacity of Leaders to Improve Working Conditions Related to Psychological Health and Well-Being in Teams: Intervention Approach, Prototype, and Evaluation Design of the Web-Application "wecoach".一种用于提升领导者能力以改善团队中与心理健康和福祉相关工作条件的数字工具:网络应用程序“wecoach”的干预方法、原型及评估设计
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;8:521355. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.521355. eCollection 2020.
3
The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Conversational Agents in Health Care: Systematic Review.
人工智能对话代理在医疗保健中的有效性:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 22;22(10):e20346. doi: 10.2196/20346.
4
Onset of workplace sexual harassment and subsequent depressive symptoms and incident depressive disorder in the Danish workforce.丹麦劳动力中职场性骚扰的发生与随后抑郁症状和新发抑郁障碍。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.058. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Improving the reporting of health research involving design: a proposed guideline.改进涉及设计的健康研究报告:一项拟议的指南。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Feb 16;5(2):e002248. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002248. eCollection 2020.
6
Conversational Agents in the Treatment of Mental Health Problems: Mixed-Method Systematic Review.用于治疗心理健康问题的对话代理:混合方法系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Oct 18;6(10):e14166. doi: 10.2196/14166.
7
Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study.人工智能(AI)主导的聊天机器人服务在医疗保健中的可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2019 Aug 21;5:2055207619871808. doi: 10.1177/2055207619871808. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
8
Chatbots and Conversational Agents in Mental Health: A Review of the Psychiatric Landscape.聊天机器人和会话代理在心理健康中的应用:精神病学领域的综述。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;64(7):456-464. doi: 10.1177/0706743719828977. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ): Development, content, reliability and validity.丹麦心理社会工作环境问卷(DPQ):编制、内容、信度和效度。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Jul 1;45(4):356-369. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3793. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
10
Measuring mental well-being in Denmark: Validation of the original and short version of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS and SWEMWBS) and cross-cultural comparison across four European settings.丹麦的精神健康测量:华威-爱丁堡心理幸福感量表(WEMWBS 和 SWEMWBS)原始版和短版的验证以及四个欧洲环境下的跨文化比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Jan;271:502-509. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 5.