Department of Demography and Geodemography, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 28;12(1):18129. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23023-0.
When evaluating vaccine efficacy, the conventional measures include reduction of risk of hospitalization and death. The number of patients dying with or without vaccination is often in the public spotlight. However, when evaluating public health interventions or the burden of disease, it is more illustrative to use mortality metrics taking into account also prematurity of the deaths, such as years of life lost (YLL) or years of life saved (YLS) thanks to the vaccination. We develop this approach for evaluation of the difference in YLL and YLS between COVID-19 victims with or without completed vaccination in the autumn pandemic wave (2021, October-December) in Czechia. For the analysis, individual data about all COVID-19 deaths in the country (N = 5797, during the studied period) was used. While 40.6% of the deaths are in cohorts with completed vaccination, this corresponds to 35.1% of years of life lost. The role of vaccination is expressed using YLS and hypothetical numbers of deaths. The registered number of deaths is approximately 3.5 times lower than it would be expected without vaccination. The results illustrate that vaccination is more effective in saving lives than suggested by simplistic comparisons.
在评估疫苗效力时,传统的衡量标准包括住院和死亡风险的降低。接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者的死亡人数经常成为公众关注的焦点。然而,在评估公共卫生干预措施或疾病负担时,使用死亡率指标考虑到死亡的提前,例如由于接种疫苗而失去的生命年(YLL)或挽救的生命年(YLS),会更具说明性。我们开发了这种方法来评估捷克共和国 2021 年秋季大流行期间(2021 年 10 月至 12 月)接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的 COVID-19 患者之间 YLL 和 YLS 的差异。在分析中,使用了该国所有 COVID-19 死亡病例的个人数据(研究期间为 5797 例)。虽然 40.6%的死亡病例发生在已完成疫苗接种的队列中,但这相当于 35.1%的生命年损失。疫苗的作用通过 YLS 和假设的死亡人数来表达。登记的死亡人数比没有接种疫苗时预期的要低约 3.5 倍。结果表明,疫苗在拯救生命方面比简单的比较更有效。