Busch André, Jäger Marcus
Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie Katholisches Klinikum Essen, Philippusstift, Essen, Deutschland.
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;51(12):1023-1032. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04319-5. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
Bone substitute materials have been successfully used for bone defects in orthopedics and trauma surgery for a long time; however, there are cases, especially in bone defects with a critical size, in which the treatment is complicated. Nowadays, multiple bone substitute materials are available. Autologous cancellous bone grafts remain the gold standard among the bone replacement materials; however, donor site morbidity and the limited availability of autologous cancellous bone represent restrictions for autologous bone grafting. Allogeneic cancellous bone grafts have also been successfully for years in the treatment of bone defects; however, infection rates of more than 10% have been described for the use of allogeneic cancellous bone. By introducing synthetic bone substitutes further alternatives are currently available to the user for the individual treatment of bone defects. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of various synthetic bone substitute materials.
骨替代材料长期以来已成功应用于骨科和创伤外科的骨缺损治疗;然而,存在一些情况,尤其是在临界尺寸的骨缺损中,治疗较为复杂。如今,有多种骨替代材料可供选择。自体松质骨移植仍然是骨替代材料中的金标准;然而,供区并发症以及自体松质骨供应有限限制了自体骨移植。同种异体松质骨移植多年来也已成功用于骨缺损治疗;然而,使用同种异体松质骨的感染率已被报道超过10%。通过引入合成骨替代材料,目前用户在骨缺损的个体化治疗中有了更多选择。本研究的目的是展示各种合成骨替代材料的优缺点。